Hannah Fries – författare

Whether on a walk a city park, local nature preserve, or national wilderness area, the wonders and healing power of nature are accessible to all. To enhance the experience and foster mindful observation, curiosity, and introspection, poet and nature lover Hannah Fries combines her own reflections and guided mindfulness exercises with a curated selection of inspirational writing from poets, naturalists, artists, scientists, and thinkers throughout the centuries and across cultures, including Japanese haiku masters, nineteenth-century European Romantics, American Transcendentalists, and contemporary environmentalists. Accompanied by beautiful forest photography, and a foreword by Robin Wall Kimmerer, author of Braiding Sweetgrass, Being with Trees is a distinctive gift that invites frequent revisiting for fresh insights and inspiration.

This beautifully illustrated essay collection offers a curious and creative invitation into the world of trees and the words we use to understand them. What is crown shyness, and how could a tree be shy? What is heartwood, and what does it have to do with the heart? So often even our scientific terms are rife with surprising etymologies and images that may reveal as much about us humans and our relationship to nature as they do about the things they describe. Words related to trees and forests are no exception. With a poet’s sensibility, Hannah Fries peels back the layers of these ecological terms, reflecting on their meaning both literally and figuratively, intertwining science and metaphor.

Bereits seit Ende des 19. Jahrhunderts beschäftigt sich die Wissenschaft mit der Frage der Behandlung der quantitativen Klageermäßigung im Sinne von § 264 Nr. 2 ZPO. Ausgangspunkt dieser Frage ist der Befund, dass eine quantitative Klageermäßigung – die Reduzierung des Klageantrags in seiner Höhe – sowohl Elemente einer Klageänderung als auch einer Klagerücknahme enthält. Diese Arbeit fasst den aktuellen Forschungsstand zu dieser Frage zusammen und entwickelt einen eigenen Lösungsvorschlag, welcher auf der dogmengeschichtlichen Wurzel von § 264 Nr. 2 ZPO beruht und auch die prozessualen Konsequenzen einer quantitativen Klageermäßigung berücksichtigt.