J. Carter – författare

This text explores the impact of race and racism in different occupational spheres within the labour market. It re-examines a number of central assumptions about segregation within the labour market and applies the concept of social closure to the analysis of the position of ethnic minority workers within the labour market. Key themes in the book include the effectiveness of equal opportunity and affirmative action policies and the extent to which employment practice has been significantly altered. Empirical material from two case studies is included in order to illustrate the central themes. The book also examines the impact of the public redefinition of institutional racism which played a central part in the Stephen Lawrence inquiry.

This text explores the impact of race and racism in different occupational spheres within the labour market. It re-examines a number of central assumptions about segregation within the labour market and applies the concept of social closure to the analysis of the position of ethnic minority workers within the labour market. Key themes in the book include the effectiveness of equal opportunity and affirmative action policies and the extent to which employment practice has been significantly altered. Empirical material from two case studies is included in order to illustrate the central themes. The book also examines the impact of the public redefinition of institutional racism which played a central part in the Stephen Lawrence inquiry.

The Economic Review was launched in 1891, the same year as the rival Economic Journal. It was the brain child of a group of concerned Oxford historians and social scientists, most of them with a strong social conscience, who were more interested in discussing economic ideas in the context of moral and social problems, than in following the Cambridge approach of advancing the status of economics as a science. The Economic Review was the voice of relatively young dons interested particularly in "the condition of the labourers" and was intended for "the increasing number of people...feeling the burden of responsibility in regard to the stress of existing problems". Unlike their Cambridge counterparts, concerned with advancing the status of economics as a science, the Review became an important vehicle for the so-called "historical economists" and also for the growing disciplines of economic history and sociology in Britain. Amongst the contributors are such distinguished names as Hobson, Cannan, Tawney, Hobhouse, Ashley and Sidney Webb. Although the Cambridge approach to economics proved triumphant, the Economic Review remains an invaluable document of the Oxford position. Present controversies about economic ideas in the context of moral and social problems, and the uses of economic theory in general, make the Economic Review an indispensable source for social and economic historians which has obvious contemporary relevance.

Is knowledge relative? Many academics across the humanities say that it is. However those who work in mainstream epistemology generally consider that it is not. Metaepistemology and Relativism questions whether the kind of anti-relativistic background that underlies typical projects in mainstream epistemology can on closer inspection be vindicated.

This text explores the impact of race and racism in different occupational spheres within the labour market. It re-examines a number of central assumptions about segregation within the labour market and applies the concept of social closure to the analysis of the position of ethnic minority workers within the labour market. Key themes in the book include the effectiveness of equal opportunity and affirmative action policies and the extent to which employment practice has been significantly altered. Empirical material from two case studies is included in order to illustrate the central themes. The book also examines the impact of the public redefinition of institutional racism which played a central part in the Stephen Lawrence inquiry.

This study establishes a long-term record of water use and water quality in a residential neighborhood served by a dead-end pipe. Using this record of water demands and quality, specific objectives of this project were to: characterize statistical properties and daily patterns of water demands;????????????????? test the hypothesis that residential water use is a Poisson pulse process;????????????????? derive travel times for water delivered to consumers on the dead-end line;????????????????? check for significant correlations between water quality and travel times;????????????????? determine if surrogate quality parameters are indicators of system integrity;???????????????? evaluate the usefulness of real-time monitoring of network water quality. Applying concepts pioneered by 20th century communication utilities (dealing with demands on telephone exchanges), a novel Poisson Rectangular Pulse (PRP) model trades phones for faucets to provide a rigorous, robust framework for describing residential water demands. The PRP model provides a sound mechanistic description of residential water use based on the intensity, duration, and frequency of demands at individual fixtures. Utilities can use the PRP demand model to: estimate peak demands in branching pipes;????????????????? discern the presence of leaks in measured pipe flows;????????????????? perform Monte Carlo simulations of residential water demands to aid probabilistic vulnerability assessments of pipe networks;????????????????? assess the impact of proposed conservation measures on system-wide demand; and to????????????????? evaluate the effect of code changes on water use habits.?