Louise Austin – författare

This book constructs a model of informed consent to surgery utilising empirical ethics and socio-legal analysis to bring together medical ethics, medical professional regulation, and medical law. The work includes an original socio-legal analysis of the models of informed consent to surgery present in court judgments and fitness to practise decisions. It constructs such a model using the empirical ethics methodology of reflexive balancing to both develop and challenge its construction. This unified model enables patients to make autonomous choices about surgery by encouraging healthcare professionals to draw upon the patient’s subjective perspective, as well as objective viewpoints, when determining what information needs to be given to patients about treatment. It incorporates a focus on the importance of patients understanding that information and having the opportunity to reflect upon it. The outcome is a model of informed consent to surgery that speaks to medical ethics, medical professional regulation, and medical law, giving equivalent weight to the insights offered by each. The book will be an invaluable resource for students, academics and researchers working in the area of Medical Law and Ethics and Bioethics.

'I loved Alex Abbott! Brilliant, fast-paced (and very, very funny!)' - Pamela Butchart, bestselling author of The Spy Who Loved School Dinners'This debut is blood-curdlingly funny, full of energy and fangtastic characters' - Daily MailWednesday meets Loki in this hilarious adventure series from debut author Louise Austin. Illustrated throughout by Katie Kear and perfect for readers of 8 to 12.Come on a fang-tastic adventure! I'm Alex Abbott. I was a completely ordinary kid until I accidentally got turned into a vampire. I have cool powers, but they’re seriously not worth it, because I have to:1. Keep the powers secret, even from my best friends (nightmare)2. Still go to school every day (thanks, Mum and Dad)3. Never eat chips or ice-cream ever again (the WORST)Actually, that’s not the worst. Trying to find a cure, I blundered into the supernatural world, broke an ancient pact and extinguished 32 tiny fire sprites (my bad). Now I’m on an epic quest to right those wrongs and make a deal with an ancient Sicilian fire demon to get my life back. What could possibly go wrong . . .?

'Brilliant, fast-paced (and very, very funny!)' Pamela Butchart 'A fiendishly fun new world of monsters, myth and mayhem. ' Jon Lock and Nich Angell, bestselling creators of Tiny HerculesWednesday meets Pamela Butchart in the second book in a fang-tastically funny adventure series about ordinary kid and reluctant vampire Alex Abbott by award-winning author Louise Austin. Perfect for readers of 8 to 12.Eleven-year-old Alex is an ordinary kid, who just happens to be a reluctant vampire. When supernatural friends in Alex’s home town start vanishing, Alex and human schoolfriends, Archie and Mia, are determined to help. Convinced a powerful enemy is responsible, the friends set out on a wild goose chase to a mythical island to confront the legendary witch goddess Circe.After a disastrous encounter that sees Alex temporarily transformed into a snail (seriously!), they start to wonder if the real villain is much closer to home. Alex must gamble everything in a deadly challenge to rescue everyone before it’s too late!

This insightful Research Handbook examines the persistent tensions between medical practitioners and patients in the context of consent. Experts contributors from legal, philosophical and medical fields explore the impact of the Supreme Court's 2015 decision in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board through a variety of lenses.Chapters cover the safety dimensions of consent, as well as the role of objective perspectives, autonomy and dignity. They address medical consent in research and innovative treatments in different jurisdictions, focusing on areas where varied interests are not easily resolved, such as abortion, end of life care, mental capacity and the treatment of children and older people. The Research Handbook also highlights the difficulties of applying legal and ethical rules of consent in the setting of Emergency departments.This is an essential resource for students and academics specialising in health law, philosophy and ethics and for those interested in the tensions of informed medical consent. It is also a beneficial guide for medical and legal practitioners, presenting crucial insights into the practicalities of implementing legal regulations around medical consent.

This book constructs a model of informed consent to surgery utilising empirical ethics and socio-legal analysis to bring together medical ethics, medical professional regulation, and medical law. The work includes an original socio-legal analysis of the models of informed consent to surgery present in court judgments and fitness to practise decisions. It constructs such a model using the empirical ethics methodology of reflexive balancing to both develop and challenge its construction. This unified model enables patients to make autonomous choices about surgery by encouraging healthcare professionals to draw upon the patient's subjective perspective, as well as objective viewpoints, when determining what information needs to be given to patients about treatment. It incorporates a focus on the importance of patients understanding that information and having the opportunity to reflect upon it. The outcome is a model of informed consent to surgery that speaks to medical ethics, medical professional regulation, and medical law, giving equivalent weight to the insights offered by each. The book will be an invaluable resource for students, academics and researchers working in the area of Medical Law and Ethics and Bioethics.

This book constructs a model of informed consent to surgery utilising empirical ethics and socio-legal analysis to bring together medical ethics, medical professional regulation, and medical law. The work includes an original socio-legal analysis of the models of informed consent to surgery present in court judgments and fitness to practise decisions. It constructs such a model using the empirical ethics methodology of reflexive balancing to both develop and challenge its construction. This unified model enables patients to make autonomous choices about surgery by encouraging healthcare professionals to draw upon the patient's subjective perspective, as well as objective viewpoints, when determining what information needs to be given to patients about treatment. It incorporates a focus on the importance of patients understanding that information and having the opportunity to reflect upon it. The outcome is a model of informed consent to surgery that speaks to medical ethics, medical professional regulation, and medical law, giving equivalent weight to the insights offered by each. The book will be an invaluable resource for students, academics and researchers working in the area of Medical Law and Ethics and Bioethics.

This insightful Research Handbook examines the persistent tensions between medical practitioners and patients in the context of consent. Experts contributors from legal, philosophical and medical fields explore the impact of the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board through a variety of lenses.Chapters cover the safety dimensions of consent, as well as the role of objective perspectives, autonomy and dignity. They address medical consent in research and innovative treatments in different jurisdictions, focusing on areas where varied interests are not easily resolved, such as abortion, end of life care, mental capacity and the treatment of children and older people. The Research Handbook also highlights the difficulties of applying legal and ethical rules of consent in the setting of Emergency departments.This is an essential resource for students and academics specialising in health law, philosophy and ethics and for those interested in the tensions of informed medical consent. It is also a beneficial guide for medical and legal practitioners, presenting crucial insights into the practicalities of implementing legal regulations around medical consent.