Markus K. Heinemann – författare
191 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
Writing a medical paper, or any other scientific text, is full of pitfalls which make it difficult to get it accepted for publication. This unique book gives practical advice on how one can circumvent these dangers. It is richly filled with examples, predominantly negative ones. which exhibit how one should not write a medical paper. This book highlights the fallibilities that manuscripts are often susceptible to, and hence will help writers avoid committing those mistakes.
Special Features:
Abundant information about a complex subject condensed in a small formatNumerous examples from bad manuscripts to drive home conceptsPractical advice on mistakes to be avoidedExplanation of the fate of a manuscript after its submission and, eventually, acceptance, to help writers understand expectations and responsesLucid language, and enjoyable readThis book will be of value to anyone with an interest in scientific publishing. Junior medical scientists (independent of specialty), experienced scientists who wish to venture as authors, reviewers, and even editorial personnel can refer to the book time and again.
208 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
Look out while you write that medical paper!
Markus Heinemann''s hands-on guide with practical advice to help you avoid mistakes while writing a medical paper is now available in an updated second edition. The book maintains its one-of-a-kind approach of presenting examples to illustrate how one should not write a medical paper or any other scientific text.
The second edition is rich in new examples from real manuscripts to drive home concepts. It also includes a new section focusing on common mistakes associated with language and stylistic principles.
Special Features:
Abundant information about a complex subject condensed in a small formatCoverage of potential pitfalls in each component of a manuscript that make it difficult for a paper to get accepted for publicationExplanation of the fate of a manuscript after its submission and, eventually, acceptance, to help writers understand expectations and responsesLucid language and enjoyable readThis book will be of value to anyone with an interest in scientific publishing. Junior medical scientists (independent of specialty), experienced scientists who wish to venture as authors, reviewers, and even editorial personnel can refer to the book time and again.
251 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
The quandaries of a reviewer—explained and addressed
A writer''s journey, from writing a manuscript to publication, is full of pitfalls. A "reviewer''s" world on the other hand is riddled with dilemmas which in turn can impact the fate of a writer''s manuscript. Both novice and experienced reviewers are perturbed by numerous questions along the process as the onus of making a recommendation about a paper lies on them. This short manual provides answers to those questions and offers several more useful tips through illustrative examples.
The numerous examples exhibit how one should not review a medical paper and also illustrate the don''ts of communication that should be taken care of by reviewers.
Key Features:
Guidance about what is expected from a reviewer, what should and should not be looked for in the different parts of a manuscript, and how speedy reviews should beDetailed explanation of all types of peer review for better understanding of conceptTips on communication errors that should be avoided, especially while suggesting revision or rejection of a manuscriptLucid language and enjoyable read