Michael Stolleis – författare

German public law has been taught in universities since the early 17th century and continues to this day to be a dominant subject in German legal culture, especially in its modern incarnations of constitutional and administrative law, and European and international law. Michael Stolleis's Public Law in Germany: A Historical Introduction from the 16th to the 21st Century, expertly translated by Thomas Dunlap, provides an account of the fundamental developments in public law that situates current debates in the German Federal Constitutional Court as well as the role of the nation-state in Europe more broadly. It further examines the role of fundamental rights through the lens of Germany's special administrative courts and discusses their important role in the advancement of German law. Written with students in mind, the book distils Stolleis's masterful four-volume History of Public Law in Germany, the third volume of which (1914-1945) was published by Oxford University Press in 2004. It is an invaluable companion to the understanding of German public law more generally.

This history of the discipline of public law in Germany covers three dramatic decades of the twentieth century. It opens with the First World War, analyses the highly creative years of the Weimar Republic, and recounts the decline of German public law that began in 1933 and extended to the downfall of the Third Reich. The author examines the dialectic of scholarship and politics against the background of long-term developments in industrial societies, the rise of the interventionist state, the shift of state law and administrative law theory, and the emergence of new disciplines (tax law, social law, labour law, business administration law). Almost all the issues and questions that preoccupy state law and administrative law theory at the dawn of the twenty-first century were first pondered and debated during this period. Stolleis begins by emphasizing the long farewell to the nineteenth century and then moves on to examine the doctrine of state law and administrative law during the First World War. The impact of the Weimar Constitution and the of the Versailles Treaty on the discipline is discussed. Here the famous 'quarrel of direction' that occurred in the field of state law doctrine (1926-1929) played a central role. But equally important was the development of state law and administrative law theory (in both the Reich and its constituent states), administrative doctrine, and the jurisprudence of international law. Part two of the book is devoted to the impact of National Socialism. The displacement of Jewish scholars, the change of direction in the professional journals, and the shutdown of the Association of State Law Teachers form one aspect of the story. The other aspect is manifested in the erosion of public law and in the growing sense of depression that gripped its practitioners. In the end, it was not only state law that was destroyed by the Nazi experience, but the scholarly discipline that went with it. The author tackles questions about the co-responsibility of scholars for the Holocaust, and the reasons fwhy academic teachers of public law were all but absent in the opposition to the Nazi regime.

Written by the eminent German legal historian, Michael Stolleis, these two ‘Essays on Legal History’ offer an original and compelling history of the symbolism through which law is characterised as being 'above' us. In ‘The Eye of the Law’, the history of this metaphor is followed from antiquity through to the present day: from the Greek Eye of Justice, the eye of the impartial judge of the Underworld, the Eye of God watching past, present and future, the Eye of the Prince, guiding his subjects, to the almighty Eye of the Law. While our belief in the law may have become brittle, nothing escapes what is now the Eye of Big Brother. ‘In the Name of the Law’ takes up the various formulas used to legitimate the decisions of the courts, from the times of absolutism over the 19th century until today. The speaker who speaks in the name of a higher being underlines his function: his authority comes from above. And it is ‘in the name of’ god, king, people, state, nation, or law, that a weak, earthly, justice receives its support.

Written by the eminent German legal historian, Michael Stolleis, these two ‘Essays on Legal History’ offer an original and compelling history of the symbolism through which law is characterised as being 'above' us. In ‘The Eye of the Law’, the history of this metaphor is followed from antiquity through to the present day: from the Greek Eye of Justice, the eye of the impartial judge of the Underworld, the Eye of God watching past, present and future, the Eye of the Prince, guiding his subjects, to the almighty Eye of the Law. While our belief in the law may have become brittle, nothing escapes what is now the Eye of Big Brother. ‘In the Name of the Law’ takes up the various formulas used to legitimate the decisions of the courts, from the times of absolutism over the 19th century until today. The speaker who speaks in the name of a higher being underlines his function: his authority comes from above. And it is ‘in the name of’ god, king, people, state, nation, or law, that a weak, earthly, justice receives its support.

This impressive volume is the first attempt to look at the intertwined histories of natural law and the laws of nature in early modern Europe. These notions became central to jurisprudence and natural philosophy in the seventeenth century; the debates that informed developments in those fields drew heavily on theology and moral philosophy, and vice versa. Historians of science, law, philosophy, and theology from Europe and North America here come together to address these central themes and to consider the question; was the emergence of natural law both in European jurisprudence and natural philosophy merely a coincidence, or did these disciplinary traditions develop within a common conceptual matrix, in which theological, philosophical, and political arguments converged to make the analogy between legal and natural orders compelling. This book will stimulate new debate in the areas of intellectual history and the history of philosophy, as well as the natural and human sciences in general.

This study, by one of Germany's most prominent scholars of legal history, examines a period crucial for the history of constitutionalism in this century after the collapse of the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation in 1806. This was the era of the Congress of Vienna, of the Restoration and the constitutionalist movement, of the Revolution of 1848 and the foundation of the German Empire by Bismarck. All these developments had profound repercussions on the social and constitutional structures of central European society; they invalidated the basic principles of the previous legal system and paved the way for the changes and controversies involved in the formation of a notion of the state and public law in the nineteenth century.But the history of public law is also marked by continuities, by long-term shits in feudal and criminal law related to the social and political conditions of the period. Integrating intellectual with political history, this book explores the constitutional movements in the literature and scholarship of public law leading to the foundation of the German Confederation, the rise of administrative law with the "German Revolution" of 1848, and the parallels between, and increased separation of, private and public spheres in the epoch of positivism that depoliticized the scholarly investigation of public law and led to the call for the purely legal construction of constitutional law that we have today.

Der Verfassungsrechtler und Rechtstheoretiker Hans Kelsen (1881-1973) wird weithin als einer der bedeutendsten, vielleicht sogar als der beherrschende Denker des 20. Jahrhunderts angesehen. Die Beiträge dieses Bandes reflektieren die von Kelsen auf besonders originelle Weise behandelten Themen auf dem neuesten Stand der Forschung. Es geht unter anderem um Normativität und Objektivität im Recht, um die Verfassung als Grundlage des positiven Rechts und um die Letztbegründung des Rechts durch eine "Grundnorm", um die Lehre vom Stufenbau der Rechtsordnung und um seine Argumente für einen Bundesstaat, um den neukantianischen Hintergrund seiner Rechtstheorie, um seine Lehre von der Rechtsgeltung, um die monistische Auffassung von Staatsrecht und Völkerrecht in der Wiener Schule, schließlich auch um seine Auseinandersetzung mit Max Adler und Eugen Ehrlich.

Die Referenten auf der Tagung der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer in Linz 2016 erörterten die gegenwärtige Lage des Grundlagenfachs "Verfassungsgeschichte" an deutschsprachigen Universitäten. Blicke auf dessen Entstehung im 19. Jahrhundert sowie auf die methodische Problematik der Deutung der Vergangenheit aus der Perspektive der Gegenwart schlossen sich an. Die Offenheit für eine politische Rekonstruktion der Vergangenheit liegt auf der Hand, ebenso aber auch die Notwendigkeit der historischen Fundierung jeder Art von gehaltvoller Verfassungstheorie.Verfassungsgeschichte kann "Leitbilder" staatsrechtlichen Denkens entwerfen, ist aber auch abhängig von solchen Leitbildern. Gegenwärtig scheinen die Erfahrungen der Weimarer Zeit, welche die frühe Bundesrepublik bestimmt haben, zu verblassen. Dafür werden in der gegenwärtigen Debatte um die Zukunft Europas und um die Folgen der Globalisierung die Erfahrungen vorstaatlicher Multinormativität des Mittelalters und der frühen Neuzeit wieder wichtiger, allerdings auch die Sorge um den Bestand des staatlichen Gewaltmonopols.

Der vorliegende Tagungsband versammelt die Ergebnisse der 4. Konferenz deutschsprachiger Juristen in Ostasien, die 2019 an der Chungnam-Universität in Daejeon (Korea) stattfand. Enthalten sind Beiträge zum Verfassungsrecht und Privatrecht in Bezug auf Deutschland und auf Europa, vor allem aber spannungsvolle und informative Analysen aus Süd-Korea, Taiwan, Japan, der Volksrepublik China, der Mongolei und Vietnam. Die deutschsprachigen Autoren aus Ostasien gehen von der Verfassungslage und ihren Vorbildern aus und widmen sich dann der Umsetzung in der politischen Praxis und der Rechtsprechung. Es folgen parallele Analysen zum Zivilrecht dieser Länder. Defizite kommen dabei ebenso zur Sprache wie Aussichten auf künftige Entwicklungen.

Die in großer Zahl überlieferten italienischen Stadtrechte des Mittelalters sind eine reiche, bisher noch nicht hinreichend genutzte Quelle für Kunstgeschichte und Rechtsgeschichte. Sie geben nicht nur Auskunft über die Anlage von Plätzen und Denkmälern, Kirchen und Stadtbefestigungen, sondern lassen auch Rückschlüsse auf den ästhetischen Gestaltungswillen der damaligen Obrigkeiten und ihre Vision der bellezza della città zu. Der Band dokumentiert eine interdisziplinäre Tagung vom 20.-23. September 2001 in der Villa Vigoni am Comer See.

This book traces the origins of the German welfare state. The author, formerly director at the Max-Planck-Institute for European Legal History, Frankfurt, provides a perceptive overview of the history of social security and social welfare in Germany from early modern times to the end of World War II, including Bismarck’s pioneering introduction of social insurance in the 1880s. The author unravels “layers” of social security that have piled up in the course of history and, so he argues, still linger in the present-day welfare state. The account begins with the first efforts by public authorities to regulate poverty and then proceeds to the “social question” that arose during the 19th-century Industrial Revolution. World War I had a major impact on the development of social security, both during the war and after, through the exigencies of the war economy, inflation and unemployment. The ruptures as well as the continuities of social policy under National Socialism and World War II are also investigated.

The sole available comprehensive history of social law and the model of social welfare in Germany.

This book traces the origins of the German welfare state. The author, formerly director at the Max-Planck-Institute for European Legal History, Frankfurt, provides a perceptive overview of the history of social security and social welfare in Germany from early modern times to the end of World War II, including Bismarck’s pioneering introduction of social insurance in the 1880s. The author unravels “layers” of social security that have piled up in the course of history and, so he argues, still linger in the present-day welfare state. The account begins with the first efforts by public authorities to regulate poverty and then proceeds to the “social question” that arose during the 19th-century Industrial Revolution. World War I had a major impact on the development of social security, both during the war and after, through the exigencies of the war economy, inflation and unemployment. The ruptures as well as the continuities of social policy under National Socialism and World War II are also investigated.

The sole available comprehensive history of social law and the model of social welfare in Germany. The book explains the origins since the medieval times, but concentrates on the 19th and 20th centuries, especially on the introduction of the social insurance 1881-1889, of the expansion of the system in the Weimar Republic, under the Nazi-System and after World War II in the FRG and the GDR. The system of social welfare in Germany is one of the pillars of economic stability.

A collaboration of leading historians of European law and philosophers of law and politics identifying and explaining the practice of interpretation of law in the 18th century. The goal: establishing the actual practice in the Age of Enlightenment, and explaining why this was the case. The ideology of the Age was that law, i.e., the will of the sovereign, can be explicitly and appropriately stated, thus making interpretation redundant. However, the reality was that in the 18th century, there was no one leading source of national law that would be the object of interpretation. Instead, there was a plurality of sources of law: the Roman Law, local customary law, and the royal ordinance. However, in deciding a case in a court of law, the law must speak with one voice. Hence, interpretation to unify the norms was inevitable. What was the process? What role did justification in terms of reason, the hallmark of the Enlightenment, play? These are some of the questions addressed.