Philippe Vincke – författare

Formal decision and evaluation models are sets of explicit and well-defined rules to collect, assess, and process information in order to be able to make recommendations in decision and/or evaluation processes. They are so widespread that almost no one can pretend not to have used or suffered the consequences of one of them.

Our earlier companion volume, Evaluation and Decision Models, heavily criticised formal models but also argued that they could be useful. On the other hand, Evaluation and Decision Models with Multiple Criteria is a guide aimed at helping the analyst to choose a model and use it consistently. We propose a sound analysis of techniques and our presentation can be extended to most decision and evaluation models as a "decision aiding methodology".

This volume is intended for the enlightened practitioner, for anyone who uses decision or evaluation models---for research or for applications---and is willing to question his practice, to have a deeper understanding of what he does.

Avec ce colloque, tenu alors qu''Ilya Prigogine (prix Nobel de Chimie) venait d''écrire avec Isabelle Stengers son célèbre ouvrage La Nouvelle Alliance, d''importantes contributions, notamment celles d''Ilya Prigogine lui-même, de Paul Glansdorff et d''Adophe Pacault pour le domaine physico-chimique, celles de Peter Allen et de Jacques Lesourne pour les domaines de la biologie et des systèmes économiques, celles de Félix Guattari, de Serge Moscovici et de Jean Petitot pour le domaine de la philosophie, ont souligné ce qu''il faut appeler quant à la notion du temps un renouveau radical, introduisant les concepts de bifurcations et de structures dissipatives, ce qui a particulièrement mis en lumière l''interaction entre sciences et cultures.