Siegfried Zepf - Böcker

In contemporary psychoanalytic thought, Freud's concept of the Oedipus complex is inclined to overshadow the interpretation of the myths surrounding Oedipus. The authors counter this situation by reversing it, utilizing the Oedipus myths to interpret the Oedipus complex. In so doing they expose it as a sheer cover story. They unmask the Oedipus complex, revealing it to be a drama staged not by Oedipus but by Jocasta, the mother, and Laius, the father. For neither Sophocles' drama nor the Oedipus myths give any indication that Oedipus is enamoured of Jocasta and born with the intention of killing his father Laius. What the myths do mention are Jocaste's passion for Oedipus whom she loves more than his father and Laius' desire to eliminate Oedipus as his rival from birth. Freud neglected these aspects of the Oedipal myths. In uncovering them the authors come to the conclusion that Oedipus did not have an Oedipus complex.

In contemporary psychoanalytic thought, Freud's concept of the Oedipus complex is inclined to overshadow the interpretation of the myths surrounding Oedipus. The authors counter this situation by reversing it, utilizing the Oedipus myths to interpret the Oedipus complex. In so doing they expose it as a sheer cover story. They unmask the Oedipus complex, revealing it to be a drama staged not by Oedipus but by Jocasta, the mother, and Laius, the father. For neither Sophocles' drama nor the Oedipus myths give any indication that Oedipus is enamoured of Jocasta and born with the intention of killing his father Laius. What the myths do mention are Jocaste's passion for Oedipus whom she loves more than his father and Laius' desire to eliminate Oedipus as his rival from birth. Freud neglected these aspects of the Oedipal myths. In uncovering them the authors come to the conclusion that Oedipus did not have an Oedipus complex. The myths divulge that it is not the son or the daughter who precipitate rivalry with their father or mother but the parents who unconsciously compete with their child for the love of their partner.

Die konkrete Wahrheit der in der Psychoanalyse gewonnenen Einsichten ist umstritten, da es bislang an einer soliden erkenntnistheoretischen Fundierung psychoanalytischen Verstehens und Begreifens fehlte. In Abgrenzung gegen aktuell diskutierte Konzepte zum wissenschaftstheoretischen Status der Psychoanalyse legen die Autoren nach kritischer Auseinandersetzung mit der Metapsychologie Freuds einen Entwurf psychoanalytischer Praxis und Theoriebildung vor, in dem die zentrale Einheit von Verändern und Erkennen im therapeutischen Prozeß aufgeschlüsselt und transparent gemacht wird. Die Praxis, an der im Verfahren der Psychoanalyse die Wahrheit ihrer Einsichten geprüft werden muß, ist das Zusammenspiel von Übertragung und Gegenübertragung. Problematisch allerdings wird das praktische Wahrheitskriterium durch die "neurotischen Resterscheinungen" auf Seiten des Analytikers, aufgrund derer dieses Zusammenspiel nur in - jeweils spezifisch - verzerrter Gestalt im Bewußtsein erscheinen kann. In den "neurotischen Resterscheinungen" liegt der subjektive Niederschlag der objektiv-gesellschaftlichen Erkenntnisgrenzen, die je nach dem gesellschaftlichen Standort des Analytikers dessen Erkenntnismöglichkeit mehr oder weniger einengen.