The increasingly popular idea that cinematic fictions can ''do'' philosophy raises some difficult questions. Who is actually doing the philosophizing? Is it the philosophical commentator who reads general arguments or theories into the stories conveyed by a film? Could it be the film-maker, or a group of collaborating film-makers, who raise and try to answer philosophical questions with a film? Is there something about the experience of films that is especially suitedto the stimulation of worthwhile philosophical reflections? In the first part of this book, Paisley Livingston surveys positions and arguments surrounding the cinema''s philosophical value. He raises criticisms of bold theses in this area and defends a moderate view of film''s possible contributions tophilosophy. In the second part of the book he defends an intentionalist approach that focuses on the film-makers'' philosophical background assumptions, sources, and aims. Livingston outlines intentionalist interpretative principles as well as an account of authorship in cinema. The third part of the book exemplifies this intentionalist approach with reference to the work of Ingmar Bergman. Livingston explores the connection between Bergman''s work and the Swedish director''s primary philosophicalsource-a treatise in philosophical psychology authored by the Finnish philosopher, Eino Kaila. Bergman proclaimed that reading this book was a tremendous philosophical experience for him and that he ''built on this ground''. With reference to materials in the newly created Ingmar Bergman archive,Livingston shows how Bergman took up Kaila''s topics in his cinematic explorations of motivated irrationality, inauthenticity, and the problem of self-knowledge.
