Since the Second Vatican Council (1962-5), the Catholic Church has formally declared the possibility of salvation for atheists: ''those who, without fault, have not yet arrived at an express recognition of God'' (Lumen Gentium 16). However, in the very same document, the Council also reiterates the traditional doctrine of the necessity of faith, baptism, and the mediation of Church in order for someone to be saved (Lumen Gentium 14). This monograph explores how thesetwo seemingly contradictory claims may satisfactorily be reconciled. Specifically, it asks - and ultimately answers - the question: How, within the parameters of Catholic dogmatic theology, is it possible for an atheist to be saved?As the first full-length study of this topic since Vatican II, the book discusses crucial foundational issues - the understanding of ''atheist'' in Catholic theology; the developing views on both unbelief, and the salvation of non-Christians, in the decades preceding the Council - before tackling the conciliar teaching itself. Considerable attention is then given to the classic solution of imputing an ''implicit'' faith to righteous atheists, best known from Karl Rahner''s theory of ''anonymousChristians'' (though the basic idea was advocated by many other major figures, including Ratzinger, Schillebeeckx, de Lubac, Balthasar, and Küng). After discussing Rahner''s specific proposals in detail, this kind of approach is however shown to be untenable. In its place, a new way of understandingVatican II''s optimism for atheists is developed in detail, in light of scripture, tradition, and magisterium. This draws principally on Christ''s descent into Hell, a renewed understanding of invincible ignorance, and a literal interpretation of Matthew 25.

Since the Second Vatican Council (1962-5), the Catholic Church has formally declared the possibility of salvation for atheists: ''those who, without fault, have not yet arrived at an express recognition of God'' (Lumen Gentium 16). However, in the very same document, the Council also reiterates the traditional doctrine of the necessity of faith, baptism, and the mediation of Church in order for someone to be saved (Lumen Gentium 14). This monograph explores how thesetwo seemingly contradictory claims may satisfactorily be reconciled. Specifically, it asks - and ultimately answers - the question: How, within the parameters of Catholic dogmatic theology, is it possible for an atheist to be saved?As the first full-length study of this topic since Vatican II, the book discusses crucial foundational issues - the understanding of ''atheist'' in Catholic theology; the developing views on both unbelief, and the salvation of non-Christians, in the decades preceding the Council - before tackling the conciliar teaching itself. Considerable attention is then given to the classic solution of imputing an ''implicit'' faith to righteous atheists, best known from Karl Rahner''s theory of ''anonymousChristians'' (though the basic idea was advocated by many other major figures, including Ratzinger, Schillebeeckx, de Lubac, Balthasar, and Küng). After discussing Rahner''s specific proposals in detail, this kind of approach is however shown to be untenable. In its place, a new way of understandingVatican II''s optimism for atheists is developed in detail, in light of scripture, tradition, and magisterium. This draws principally on Christ''s descent into Hell, a renewed understanding of invincible ignorance, and a literal interpretation of Matthew 25.

Since the Second Vatican Council (1962-5), the Catholic Church has formally declared the possibility of salvation for atheists: ''those who, without fault, have not yet arrived at an express recognition of God'' (Lumen Gentium 16). However, in the very same document, the Council also reiterates the traditional doctrine of the necessity of faith, baptism, and the mediation of Church in order for someone to be saved (Lumen Gentium 14). This monograph explores how thesetwo seemingly contradictory claims may satisfactorily be reconciled. Specifically, it asks - and ultimately answers - the question: How, within the parameters of Catholic dogmatic theology, is it possible for an atheist to be saved?As the first full-length study of this topic since Vatican II, the book discusses crucial foundational issues - the understanding of ''atheist'' in Catholic theology; the developing views on both unbelief, and the salvation of non-Christians, in the decades preceding the Council - before tackling the conciliar teaching itself. Considerable attention is then given to the classic solution of imputing an ''implicit'' faith to righteous atheists, best known from Karl Rahner''s theory of ''anonymousChristians'' (though the basic idea was advocated by many other major figures, including Ratzinger, Schillebeeckx, de Lubac, Balthasar, and Küng). After discussing Rahner''s specific proposals in detail, this kind of approach is however shown to be untenable. In its place, a new way of understandingVatican II''s optimism for atheists is developed in detail, in light of scripture, tradition, and magisterium. This draws principally on Christ''s descent into Hell, a renewed understanding of invincible ignorance, and a literal interpretation of Matthew 25.