Ana Bobić is a référendaire at the Court of Justice of the European Union to Advocate General Tamara Capeta. Until 2021, she was a Postdoctoral Researcher at the LEVIATHAN Project at the Hertie School, working on questions of legal accountability in EU economic governance, with a specific focus on the position of the individual in the Economic and Monetary Union. In 2018, she completed the DPhil at the Faculty of Law, University of Oxford as a Law Faculty Graduate Assistance Fund scholar. In Oxford, she was a lecturer in Constitutional and Administrative Law at Keble College.

• PART I - THEORISING CONSTITUTIONAL CONFLICT 1: Introduction 2: Theoretical framework: Constitutional pluralism 3: Constitutional pluralism as a descriptive theory 4: Constitutional pluralism as a normative theory PART II - THE JURISPRUDENCE 5: Ultra vires review 6: Identity review 7: Fundamental rights review PART III - CONCLUSIONS 8: Judicial triangles across case studies 9: Three lessons and a warning

Ana Bobić is a référendaire at the Court of Justice of the European Union to Advocate General Tamara Capeta. Until 2021, she was a Postdoctoral Researcher at the LEVIATHAN Project at the Hertie School, working on questions of legal accountability in EU economic governance, with a specific focus on the position of the individual in the Economic and Monetary Union. In 2018, she completed the DPhil at the Faculty of Law, University of Oxford as a Law Faculty Graduate Assistance Fund scholar. In Oxford, she was a lecturer in Constitutional and Administrative Law at Keble College.

• PART I - THEORISING CONSTITUTIONAL CONFLICT 1: Introduction 2: Theoretical framework: Constitutional pluralism 3: Constitutional pluralism as a descriptive theory 4: Constitutional pluralism as a normative theory PART II - THE JURISPRUDENCE 5: Ultra vires review 6: Identity review 7: Fundamental rights review PART III - CONCLUSIONS 8: Judicial triangles across case studies 9: Three lessons and a warning

Ana Bobić is a référendaire at the Court of Justice of the European Union to Advocate General Tamara Capeta. Until 2021, she was a Postdoctoral Researcher at the LEVIATHAN Project at the Hertie School, working on questions of legal accountability in EU economic governance, with a specific focus on the position of the individual in the Economic and Monetary Union. In 2018, she completed the DPhil at the Faculty of Law, University of Oxford as a Law Faculty Graduate Assistance Fund scholar. In Oxford, she was a lecturer in Constitutional and Administrative Law at Keble College.

• PART I - THEORISING CONSTITUTIONAL CONFLICT 1: Introduction 2: Theoretical framework: Constitutional pluralism 3: Constitutional pluralism as a descriptive theory 4: Constitutional pluralism as a normative theory PART II - THE JURISPRUDENCE 5: Ultra vires review 6: Identity review 7: Fundamental rights review PART III - CONCLUSIONS 8: Judicial triangles across case studies 9: Three lessons and a warning