As climate change brings devastation to all areas of the world, and U.S. journalists cover these threats more extensively, climate reporting needs to be evaluated. Media representations of the climate crisis are critical because they influence what responses are taken and policies enacted. In Apocalyptic Authoritarianism, media scholar Hanna E. Morris reveals how national anxieties following the 2016 presidential election have shaped American news coverage of climate change in ways that severely limit how it has come to be known, imagined, and contended with. Looking at climate change reporting across prominent and ideologically diverse U.S. newspapers and magazines over the past decade, the book traces how news media create an illusion of control in the present through nostalgic and heroic stories of the past. Morris identifies a new mode of reactionary politics called "e;apocalyptic authoritarianism"e; to describe the post-2016 alignment of historically privileged figures united by a common enemy of the "e;new"e; New Left and a shared appeal to fears of "e;total crisis."e; Their antidemocratic paradigm portends national and planetary disarray if progressive social and climate justice "e;warriors"e; are not controlled at home and if "e;unruly masses"e; of climate migrants are not contained abroad. Ultimately, Morris calls for a robust and inclusive form of climate journalism and politics to facilitate--and not impede--democratic and equitable responses to climate change.

As climate change brings devastation to all areas of the world, and U.S. journalists cover these threats more extensively, climate reporting needs to be evaluated. Media representations of the climate crisis are critical because they influence what responses are taken and policies enacted. In Apocalyptic Authoritarianism, media scholar Hanna E. Morris reveals how national anxieties following the 2016 presidential election have shaped American news coverage of climate change in ways that severely limit how it has come to be known, imagined, and contended with. Looking at climate change reporting across prominent and ideologically diverse U.S. newspapers and magazines over the past decade, the book traces how news media create an illusion of control in the present through nostalgic and heroic stories of the past. Morris identifies a new mode of reactionary politics called "e;apocalyptic authoritarianism"e; to describe the post-2016 alignment of historically privileged figures united by a common enemy of the "e;new"e; New Left and a shared appeal to fears of "e;total crisis."e; Their antidemocratic paradigm portends national and planetary disarray if progressive social and climate justice "e;warriors"e; are not controlled at home and if "e;unruly masses"e; of climate migrants are not contained abroad. Ultimately, Morris calls for a robust and inclusive form of climate journalism and politics to facilitate--and not impede--democratic and equitable responses to climate change.

As climate change brings devastation to all areas of the world, and U.S. journalists cover these threats more extensively, climate reporting needs to be evaluated. Media representations of the climate crisis are critical because they influence what responses are taken and policies enacted. In Apocalyptic Authoritarianism, media scholar Hanna E. Morris reveals how national anxieties following the 2016 presidential election have shaped American news coverage of climate change in ways that severely limit how it has come to be known, imagined, and contended with. Looking at climate change reporting across prominent and ideologically diverse U.S. newspapers and magazines over the past decade, the book traces how news media create an illusion of control in the present through nostalgic and heroic stories of the past. Morris identifies a new mode of reactionary politics called "e;apocalyptic authoritarianism"e; to describe the post-2016 alignment of historically privileged figures united by a common enemy of the "e;new"e; New Left and a shared appeal to fears of "e;total crisis."e; Their antidemocratic paradigm portends national and planetary disarray if progressive social and climate justice "e;warriors"e; are not controlled at home and if "e;unruly masses"e; of climate migrants are not contained abroad. Ultimately, Morris calls for a robust and inclusive form of climate journalism and politics to facilitate--and not impede--democratic and equitable responses to climate change.