'It is clear, literature-sensitive, and particularly challenging for internalist epistemologists who think they have to choose between a foundationalism that grounds everything and coherentism ... he makes a distinctive contribution, one worth careful study.'Douglas Odegard, University of Guelph, Contemporary Philosophical Reviews, VXI, No. 5 - VXII, No. 1 (Oct, 91-Jan, 92)

• Introduction; Sensory experience; Reasons, justification, and evidence I; Reasons, Justification, and evidence II; Experience and justification; Cognitive capacities and justification; Groundless beliefs; Scepticism; Bibliography; Index

'It is clear, literature-sensitive, and particularly challenging for internalist epistemologists who think they have to choose between a foundationalism that grounds everything and coherentism ... he makes a distinctive contribution, one worth careful study.'Douglas Odegard, University of Guelph, Contemporary Philosophical Reviews, VXI, No. 5 - VXII, No. 1 (Oct, 91-Jan, 92)

• Introduction; Sensory experience; Reasons, justification, and evidence I; Reasons, Justification, and evidence II; Experience and justification; Cognitive capacities and justification; Groundless beliefs; Scepticism; Bibliography; Index

'It is clear, literature-sensitive, and particularly challenging for internalist epistemologists who think they have to choose between a foundationalism that grounds everything and coherentism ... he makes a distinctive contribution, one worth careful study.'Douglas Odegard, University of Guelph, Contemporary Philosophical Reviews, VXI, No. 5 - VXII, No. 1 (Oct, 91-Jan, 92)

• Introduction; Sensory experience; Reasons, justification, and evidence I; Reasons, Justification, and evidence II; Experience and justification; Cognitive capacities and justification; Groundless beliefs; Scepticism; Bibliography; Index