Daniel Halliday is Associate Professor in Philosophy at the University of Melbourne, Australia.Matthew Harding is Professor of Law, University of Melbourne, Australia.

• Table of ContentsTable of ContentsList of ContributorsAcknowledgements[Introduction] IntroductionDaniel Halliday and Matthew Harding[Chapter 1] What Does it Mean to ‘Act Charitably’? Revisiting the Purposes and Activities Distinction in Charity LawAdam Parachin[Chapter 1 Comment] Purposes, Activities and the Continued Importance of Charity Modes of ActionIan Murray[Chapter 2] Too Private to Be Charitable: Difficulties in Drawing the Line in Charity LawDebra Morris[Chapter 2 Comment] Too Private to Be Charitable: Commentary on Debra Morris’s ChapterJennifer Batrouney AM QC[Chapter 3] Public Benefit and Charitable ClassLloyd Hitoshi Mayer[Chapter 3 Comment] Comment on Public Benefit and Charitable ClassMatthew Harding[Chapter 4] Public Benefit and Public Policy: Keeping up with Discrimination?Myles McGregor-Lowndes[Chapter 4 Comment] Commentary on Public Benefit and Public Policy: Keeping up with Discrimination?Matthew Turnour and Elizabeth Shalders[Chapter 5] A No-Benefit Benefit Test: When, If Ever, Should Benefit Be Presumed or Assumed in Charity Law?Mary Synge[Chapter 5 Comment] A No-Benefit Benefit Test: CommentPauline Ridge[Chapter 6] Weighing Benefits and Detriments in the Law of CharitiesJane Calderwood Norton[Chapter 6 Comment] Some Further Reflections on Incommensurability, Public Benefit, and Autonomy: Commentary on Weighing Benefits and Detriments in the Law of CharitiesDaniel Halliday[Chapter 7] Public Reason, Public Benefit, and ‘Political’ CharitiesPatrick Emerton[Chapter 7 Comment] Comment on Public Reason, Public Benefit, and ‘Political’ CharitiesJennifer L Beard[Chapter 8]Issues and Problems with the Application of the Public Benefit Test in New Zealand LawSue Barker[Chapter 8 Comment]Comment: Purpose and Public BenefitRosemary Teele LangfordIndex

Daniel Halliday is Associate Professor in Philosophy at the University of Melbourne, Australia.Matthew Harding is Professor of Law, University of Melbourne, Australia.

• Table of ContentsTable of ContentsList of ContributorsAcknowledgements[Introduction] IntroductionDaniel Halliday and Matthew Harding[Chapter 1] What Does it Mean to ‘Act Charitably’? Revisiting the Purposes and Activities Distinction in Charity LawAdam Parachin[Chapter 1 Comment] Purposes, Activities and the Continued Importance of Charity Modes of ActionIan Murray[Chapter 2] Too Private to Be Charitable: Difficulties in Drawing the Line in Charity LawDebra Morris[Chapter 2 Comment] Too Private to Be Charitable: Commentary on Debra Morris’s ChapterJennifer Batrouney AM QC[Chapter 3] Public Benefit and Charitable ClassLloyd Hitoshi Mayer[Chapter 3 Comment] Comment on Public Benefit and Charitable ClassMatthew Harding[Chapter 4] Public Benefit and Public Policy: Keeping up with Discrimination?Myles McGregor-Lowndes[Chapter 4 Comment] Commentary on Public Benefit and Public Policy: Keeping up with Discrimination?Matthew Turnour and Elizabeth Shalders[Chapter 5] A No-Benefit Benefit Test: When, If Ever, Should Benefit Be Presumed or Assumed in Charity Law?Mary Synge[Chapter 5 Comment] A No-Benefit Benefit Test: CommentPauline Ridge[Chapter 6] Weighing Benefits and Detriments in the Law of CharitiesJane Calderwood Norton[Chapter 6 Comment] Some Further Reflections on Incommensurability, Public Benefit, and Autonomy: Commentary on Weighing Benefits and Detriments in the Law of CharitiesDaniel Halliday[Chapter 7] Public Reason, Public Benefit, and ‘Political’ CharitiesPatrick Emerton[Chapter 7 Comment] Comment on Public Reason, Public Benefit, and ‘Political’ CharitiesJennifer L Beard[Chapter 8]Issues and Problems with the Application of the Public Benefit Test in New Zealand LawSue Barker[Chapter 8 Comment]Comment: Purpose and Public BenefitRosemary Teele LangfordIndex

Daniel Halliday is Associate Professor in Philosophy at the University of Melbourne, Australia.Matthew Harding is Professor of Law, University of Melbourne, Australia.

• Table of ContentsTable of ContentsList of ContributorsAcknowledgements[Introduction] IntroductionDaniel Halliday and Matthew Harding[Chapter 1] What Does it Mean to ‘Act Charitably’? Revisiting the Purposes and Activities Distinction in Charity LawAdam Parachin[Chapter 1 Comment] Purposes, Activities and the Continued Importance of Charity Modes of ActionIan Murray[Chapter 2] Too Private to Be Charitable: Difficulties in Drawing the Line in Charity LawDebra Morris[Chapter 2 Comment] Too Private to Be Charitable: Commentary on Debra Morris’s ChapterJennifer Batrouney AM QC[Chapter 3] Public Benefit and Charitable ClassLloyd Hitoshi Mayer[Chapter 3 Comment] Comment on Public Benefit and Charitable ClassMatthew Harding[Chapter 4] Public Benefit and Public Policy: Keeping up with Discrimination?Myles McGregor-Lowndes[Chapter 4 Comment] Commentary on Public Benefit and Public Policy: Keeping up with Discrimination?Matthew Turnour and Elizabeth Shalders[Chapter 5] A No-Benefit Benefit Test: When, If Ever, Should Benefit Be Presumed or Assumed in Charity Law?Mary Synge[Chapter 5 Comment] A No-Benefit Benefit Test: CommentPauline Ridge[Chapter 6] Weighing Benefits and Detriments in the Law of CharitiesJane Calderwood Norton[Chapter 6 Comment] Some Further Reflections on Incommensurability, Public Benefit, and Autonomy: Commentary on Weighing Benefits and Detriments in the Law of CharitiesDaniel Halliday[Chapter 7] Public Reason, Public Benefit, and ‘Political’ CharitiesPatrick Emerton[Chapter 7 Comment] Comment on Public Reason, Public Benefit, and ‘Political’ CharitiesJennifer L Beard[Chapter 8]Issues and Problems with the Application of the Public Benefit Test in New Zealand LawSue Barker[Chapter 8 Comment]Comment: Purpose and Public BenefitRosemary Teele LangfordIndex