Paul Reilly is a Senior Lecturer in Communications, Media & Democracy at the University of Glasgow

'This book is a must-read for anyone interested in the context of NI as a divided society, understanding the recent history of local protests and disputes (between 2012-2015) and the wider scene of the relations between NI, Ireland, and the UK.'LSE Review of Books 'Much that is written about the politics of Northern Ireland is based on highly selective accounts of the available evidence. Reilly eschews this approach, subjecting the political use of social media to sustained critique in this empirically rich study. In so doing, he makes a very valuable contribution to scholarship.'Phil Ramsey, Lecturer in the School of Communication and Media, Ulster University'A timely historical account cataloguing a rich collection of the author's empirical research, the book evinces continuity in polarisation among Northern Irish communities online. Showing how the use of social media adds further complexity to community relations, for instance through the pointed concept of 'silly citizenship', Reilly meticulously dispels earlier techno-optimism while further contextualising the algorithmic power of social media.'Dan Mercea, Reader in Media and Communication, City, University of London'While the darkest days of Northern Ireland’s "troubles" are over, the divisions have left lasting scars and in the twenty-first century the competing interpretations of the conflict and the country’s constitutional status remain entrenched. Reilly’s work explores the contribution of digital citizenship to peacebuilding within this complex context. The comprehensive and engaging analysis explores how a society beset with deeply held prejudices form online communities, share content and can be misled by misinformation so contributing to a range of wider debates on the role of digital media. As with many studies Reilly identifies positives, such as Citizen Assemblies and accounts that scrutinize decision making, as well as the acts of ‘silly citizenship’ which satires sectarianism and can exacerbate divide. Reilly’s work is an important contribution to our understanding of digital politics, how platforms can be a force for good or ill depending on the motivations and behaviour of users, and how forms of digital citizenship can support or disrupt societal healing processes. Reilly’s study is a must read for scholars and students seeking to understand the complex roles which digital technologies play in socio-political life as well as for those seeking to understand the dynamics of present day Northern Ireland and how it might face the challenges of a post-Brexit world.'Darren Lilleker, Professor of Political Communication, Bournemouth University'An important addition to research on digital disinformation and misinformation in a society where conflict and division remain worryingly close to the surface.'Una Murphy (View Magazine)'A perfect academic study for identifying public engagement in the times of the dysfunctional politics searching for reconciliation through new conceptual tools like silly citizenship in post-Brexit Irish border that will remain disputed in the years to come.'Murat Akser, Journal of Communication'Reilly's book makes an invaluable contribution to the debate on the potential of citizen activity on online platforms to contribute to peacebuilding in Northern Ireland. It deserves attention.' Kathryn Johnston, The Peace Journalist'As Reilly explains, social media can be considered as vital during the mobilisation of social movements. This view can be seen as a critique to clicktivism because even though there are ‘dangers’ that online platforms may increase division and tension between groups, Reilly argues that there is a chance and hope that, by looking at the Northern Irish case, one can argue that there would be more engagement and interactions between opponent groups in the future.''Reilly’s study is very useful to discuss how politics and digital citizenship take place in contentious times in divided societies. Whether social media are a part of the "problem" or encourage dialogue between opposing groups, he uses mixed research methods to strengthen his study.'Hakan Karahasan, Arkin University of Creative Arts and Design (ARUCAD) 'His work is very rich not only in terms of its literature but also its research methods and techniques and the way he elaborates such a complex situation in a clear way without simplifying the issue. Even though the book uses Northern Ireland as a case study, it is very useful for any kind of study that focuses on digital citizenship and activism as well as digital democracy and how divided societies and groups use social media in the age of digital world.'Digital Contention

• Introduction1 Social media, contentious politics, and social movements2 Too many cyber warriors? The case of Loyalist Peaceful Protest Updater3 “You can’t eat a flag” Northern Ireland Twitter responds to the flag protests4 PSNIRA vs. peaceful protesters? YouTube, sousveillance and the policing of the flag protests5 Parody of Esteem? LAD and the rise of ‘silly citizenship’6 Twitter, affective publics and public demonstrations: The 2014 and 2015 Ardoyne parade disputesConclusionAppendix 1 Content Analysis of newspaper coverage of flag protestsAppendix 2 Content analysis of newspaper coverage of Ardoyne parade disputeBibliographyIndex

Paul Reilly is a Senior Lecturer in Communications, Media & Democracy at the University of Glasgow

'This book is a must-read for anyone interested in the context of NI as a divided society, understanding the recent history of local protests and disputes (between 2012-2015) and the wider scene of the relations between NI, Ireland, and the UK.'LSE Review of Books 'Much that is written about the politics of Northern Ireland is based on highly selective accounts of the available evidence. Reilly eschews this approach, subjecting the political use of social media to sustained critique in this empirically rich study. In so doing, he makes a very valuable contribution to scholarship.'Phil Ramsey, Lecturer in the School of Communication and Media, Ulster University'A timely historical account cataloguing a rich collection of the author's empirical research, the book evinces continuity in polarisation among Northern Irish communities online. Showing how the use of social media adds further complexity to community relations, for instance through the pointed concept of 'silly citizenship', Reilly meticulously dispels earlier techno-optimism while further contextualising the algorithmic power of social media.'Dan Mercea, Reader in Media and Communication, City, University of London'While the darkest days of Northern Ireland’s "troubles" are over, the divisions have left lasting scars and in the twenty-first century the competing interpretations of the conflict and the country’s constitutional status remain entrenched. Reilly’s work explores the contribution of digital citizenship to peacebuilding within this complex context. The comprehensive and engaging analysis explores how a society beset with deeply held prejudices form online communities, share content and can be misled by misinformation so contributing to a range of wider debates on the role of digital media. As with many studies Reilly identifies positives, such as Citizen Assemblies and accounts that scrutinize decision making, as well as the acts of ‘silly citizenship’ which satires sectarianism and can exacerbate divide. Reilly’s work is an important contribution to our understanding of digital politics, how platforms can be a force for good or ill depending on the motivations and behaviour of users, and how forms of digital citizenship can support or disrupt societal healing processes. Reilly’s study is a must read for scholars and students seeking to understand the complex roles which digital technologies play in socio-political life as well as for those seeking to understand the dynamics of present day Northern Ireland and how it might face the challenges of a post-Brexit world.'Darren Lilleker, Professor of Political Communication, Bournemouth University'An important addition to research on digital disinformation and misinformation in a society where conflict and division remain worryingly close to the surface.'Una Murphy (View Magazine)'A perfect academic study for identifying public engagement in the times of the dysfunctional politics searching for reconciliation through new conceptual tools like silly citizenship in post-Brexit Irish border that will remain disputed in the years to come.'Murat Akser, Journal of Communication'Reilly's book makes an invaluable contribution to the debate on the potential of citizen activity on online platforms to contribute to peacebuilding in Northern Ireland. It deserves attention.' Kathryn Johnston, The Peace Journalist'As Reilly explains, social media can be considered as vital during the mobilisation of social movements. This view can be seen as a critique to clicktivism because even though there are ‘dangers’ that online platforms may increase division and tension between groups, Reilly argues that there is a chance and hope that, by looking at the Northern Irish case, one can argue that there would be more engagement and interactions between opponent groups in the future.''Reilly’s study is very useful to discuss how politics and digital citizenship take place in contentious times in divided societies. Whether social media are a part of the "problem" or encourage dialogue between opposing groups, he uses mixed research methods to strengthen his study.'Hakan Karahasan, Arkin University of Creative Arts and Design (ARUCAD) 'His work is very rich not only in terms of its literature but also its research methods and techniques and the way he elaborates such a complex situation in a clear way without simplifying the issue. Even though the book uses Northern Ireland as a case study, it is very useful for any kind of study that focuses on digital citizenship and activism as well as digital democracy and how divided societies and groups use social media in the age of digital world.'Digital Contention

• Introduction1 Social media, contentious politics, and social movements2 Too many cyber warriors? The case of Loyalist Peaceful Protest Updater3 “You can’t eat a flag” Northern Ireland Twitter responds to the flag protests4 PSNIRA vs. peaceful protesters? YouTube, sousveillance and the policing of the flag protests5 Parody of Esteem? LAD and the rise of ‘silly citizenship’6 Twitter, affective publics and public demonstrations: The 2014 and 2015 Ardoyne parade disputesConclusionAppendix 1 Content Analysis of newspaper coverage of flag protestsAppendix 2 Content analysis of newspaper coverage of Ardoyne parade disputeBibliographyIndex