Charles R. Bambach is Associate Professor of History of Ideas/Philosophy, University of Texas at Dallas.

Charles Bambach is a philosopher who aims to make philosophical discussions of Heidegger more historical and closer to the context of Heidegger's thought. The central point of Bambach's book about the place of politics and rootedness in Heidegger's thought is that Heidegger's philosophical work in the 1930s was deeply connected to National Socialism.... There is still important sorting to be done in relation to what is living and what is dead in Heidegger, but Bambach's book is a significant contribution to this discussion. Heidegger's vision of the world was far from the mainstream of contemporary American academic discourse, and this is Bambach's main concern: to caution us about the selective appropriation of Heidegger's ideas about ecology.(Journal of Modern History) Bambach offers a close reading of Heidegger's texts both in the immediate historical an apolitical context of the years in which they were written and in the context of Heidegger's overall project of deconstructing the Western metaphysical tradition of calculative thinking that objectifies beings and transforms all forms of existence into resources to gain mastery over the earth.(H-Net Reviews) Mr. Bambach's signal achievement is to show, by a scrupulous reading of Heidegger's work, that he was not simply a political naïf caught up in a political maelstrom, as he tried to portray himself after the war. Nor was his decision to become Nazi Rector of his university merely a personal mistake, unrelated to his thought. Rather, Mr. Bambach shows that the very roots of his philosophy grow out of a poisonous soil.... Mr. Bambach shows conclusively that Heidegger did not just disgrace himself with his Nazism; he revealed something essentially dangerous about his thought.(New York Sun) This book is not an expose; we've been through Martin Heidegger's none-too-salubrious laundry hamper before. But it is a book that asks the right question. It is time, Charles Bambach argues, for intellectual historians to get beyond apologies on the one hand, and attempts at total definition and dismissal on the other; rather, he insists, 'we need to ask, what kind of National Socialism did Heidegger aspire to establish? How did Heidegger's own inimitable brand of National Socialism affect the questions he raised about Germany and its place in the history of the West?' (p. xviii). To answer these questions, Bambach make a series of extremely careful and interesting excursuses into specific political, intellectual, and linguistic contexts that shaped Heidegger's thinking, uncovering the ways in which that master punster and merge/sorter of idea fashioned his public statements.(Central European History)

Charles R. Bambach is Associate Professor of History of Ideas/Philosophy, University of Texas at Dallas.

Charles Bambach is a philosopher who aims to make philosophical discussions of Heidegger more historical and closer to the context of Heidegger's thought. The central point of Bambach's book about the place of politics and rootedness in Heidegger's thought is that Heidegger's philosophical work in the 1930s was deeply connected to National Socialism.... There is still important sorting to be done in relation to what is living and what is dead in Heidegger, but Bambach's book is a significant contribution to this discussion. Heidegger's vision of the world was far from the mainstream of contemporary American academic discourse, and this is Bambach's main concern: to caution us about the selective appropriation of Heidegger's ideas about ecology.(Journal of Modern History) Bambach offers a close reading of Heidegger's texts both in the immediate historical an apolitical context of the years in which they were written and in the context of Heidegger's overall project of deconstructing the Western metaphysical tradition of calculative thinking that objectifies beings and transforms all forms of existence into resources to gain mastery over the earth.(H-Net Reviews) Mr. Bambach's signal achievement is to show, by a scrupulous reading of Heidegger's work, that he was not simply a political naïf caught up in a political maelstrom, as he tried to portray himself after the war. Nor was his decision to become Nazi Rector of his university merely a personal mistake, unrelated to his thought. Rather, Mr. Bambach shows that the very roots of his philosophy grow out of a poisonous soil.... Mr. Bambach shows conclusively that Heidegger did not just disgrace himself with his Nazism; he revealed something essentially dangerous about his thought.(New York Sun) This book is not an expose; we've been through Martin Heidegger's none-too-salubrious laundry hamper before. But it is a book that asks the right question. It is time, Charles Bambach argues, for intellectual historians to get beyond apologies on the one hand, and attempts at total definition and dismissal on the other; rather, he insists, 'we need to ask, what kind of National Socialism did Heidegger aspire to establish? How did Heidegger's own inimitable brand of National Socialism affect the questions he raised about Germany and its place in the history of the West?' (p. xviii). To answer these questions, Bambach make a series of extremely careful and interesting excursuses into specific political, intellectual, and linguistic contexts that shaped Heidegger's thinking, uncovering the ways in which that master punster and merge/sorter of idea fashioned his public statements.(Central European History)