Eileen Braman is Associate Professor of Political Science at Indiana University and the author of Law, Politics, and Perception: How Policy Preferences Influence Legal Reasoning (Virginia).

“A well-written, well-researched, and timely book that takes an interdisciplinary approach to addressing questions core to American democracy. Braman uses an impressive array of nationally representative survey experiments and paints a nuanced picture of how the public views institutional change and legitimacy. This is a one-of-a-kind book in the field of political science.” - Paul M. Collins Jr., University of Massachusetts, Amherst, author of Friends of the Supreme Court: Interest Groups and Judicial Decision Making“The American political system is in crisis. Gridlock has given way to anti-democratic sentiments that delegitimize the polity. Braman offers a remarkable perspective by pinpointing what shapes Americans’ beliefs about institutions. Cutting edge theory and rigorous empirical analyses reveal that when people believe institutions are working against personal and societal interests, they support fundamental change to the governance structure. Braman’s foundational contribution reorients conversations by making clear that democracy can be sustained with popular institutional changes.” - James N. Druckman, Northwestern University, co-author, with Lawrence R. Jacobs, of Who Governs? Presidents, Public Opinion, and Manipulation

• List of TablesPrefaceAcknowledgementsIntroduction1. Conceptualizing and Studying Perceptions of Appropriate Government Authority and Support for Institutional Change2. Exploring the Role of Rules and Politics in Evaluations of Judicial, Legislative, and Unilateral Executive Action3. Assessing the Credibility of Constitutional Experts4. Examining Justifications for Citizens' Evaluations of Legislative Action on Gun Control and Immigration5. Valuing Institutions: The United States Supreme Court6. Electoral Expectations and Support for Constitutional Change7. Institutional Prospects: Measuring Support for Changes to the Supreme CourtConclusionReferencesAppendix

Eileen Braman is Associate Professor of Political Science at Indiana University and the author of Law, Politics, and Perception: How Policy Preferences Influence Legal Reasoning (Virginia).

“A well-written, well-researched, and timely book that takes an interdisciplinary approach to addressing questions core to American democracy. Braman uses an impressive array of nationally representative survey experiments and paints a nuanced picture of how the public views institutional change and legitimacy. This is a one-of-a-kind book in the field of political science.” - Paul M. Collins Jr., University of Massachusetts, Amherst, author of Friends of the Supreme Court: Interest Groups and Judicial Decision Making“The American political system is in crisis. Gridlock has given way to anti-democratic sentiments that delegitimize the polity. Braman offers a remarkable perspective by pinpointing what shapes Americans’ beliefs about institutions. Cutting edge theory and rigorous empirical analyses reveal that when people believe institutions are working against personal and societal interests, they support fundamental change to the governance structure. Braman’s foundational contribution reorients conversations by making clear that democracy can be sustained with popular institutional changes.” - James N. Druckman, Northwestern University, co-author, with Lawrence R. Jacobs, of Who Governs? Presidents, Public Opinion, and Manipulation

• List of TablesPrefaceAcknowledgementsIntroduction1. Conceptualizing and Studying Perceptions of Appropriate Government Authority and Support for Institutional Change2. Exploring the Role of Rules and Politics in Evaluations of Judicial, Legislative, and Unilateral Executive Action3. Assessing the Credibility of Constitutional Experts4. Examining Justifications for Citizens' Evaluations of Legislative Action on Gun Control and Immigration5. Valuing Institutions: The United States Supreme Court6. Electoral Expectations and Support for Constitutional Change7. Institutional Prospects: Measuring Support for Changes to the Supreme CourtConclusionReferencesAppendix