Rosalind Carey teaches philosophy at Lehman College, CUNY, USA. Her previous publications include four journal articles and numerous book reviews in the Journal of the History of Philosophy and elsewhere.

"Rosalind Carey's new book, Russell and Wittgenstein on the Nature of Judgement, offers a fresh look at Wittgenstein's fateful but notoriously obscure criticisms of Russell's so-called ‘multiple-relation theory of judgement', offered in May-June of 1913 as Russell was hastily composing the Theory of Knowledge manuscript...Carey's book is well researched, well written, and makes a thorough and powerful case for its central thesis. Without a doubt, it constitutes an important contribution to both the scholarship addressing this key event within the history of analytics philosophy in particular, and that concerning Russell's work more generally...Carey develops a formidable case for her reconstruction, which is backed up by painstaking research and insightful analysis. Most importantly, Carey offers what seems to me to be a both novel and illuminating perspective on these events, one which promises to enliven scholarly debate on the matter for years to come." -James Connelly, Russell: the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies, Winter 2008-09

• Introduction: The Dialogue With Wittgenstein and Its; Background; 1: Wittgenstein's January Letter, Relations and Logical Data; 2: Understanding, Belief, and The Problem Of Falsehood; 3: Negative Facts, Bipolarity, and The June Letter. Appendices:; Correspondence and Notes; Bibliography; Index.

Rosalind Carey teaches philosophy at Lehman College, CUNY, USA. Her previous publications include four journal articles and numerous book reviews in the Journal of the History of Philosophy and elsewhere.

"Rosalind Carey's new book, Russell and Wittgenstein on the Nature of Judgement, offers a fresh look at Wittgenstein's fateful but notoriously obscure criticisms of Russell's so-called ‘multiple-relation theory of judgement', offered in May-June of 1913 as Russell was hastily composing the Theory of Knowledge manuscript...Carey's book is well researched, well written, and makes a thorough and powerful case for its central thesis. Without a doubt, it constitutes an important contribution to both the scholarship addressing this key event within the history of analytics philosophy in particular, and that concerning Russell's work more generally...Carey develops a formidable case for her reconstruction, which is backed up by painstaking research and insightful analysis. Most importantly, Carey offers what seems to me to be a both novel and illuminating perspective on these events, one which promises to enliven scholarly debate on the matter for years to come." -James Connelly, Russell: the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies, Winter 2008-09

• Introduction: The Dialogue With Wittgenstein and Its; Background; 1: Wittgenstein's January Letter, Relations and Logical Data; 2: Understanding, Belief, and The Problem Of Falsehood; 3: Negative Facts, Bipolarity, and The June Letter. Appendices:; Correspondence and Notes; Bibliography; Index.

Rosalind Carey teaches philosophy at Lehman College, CUNY, USA. Her previous publications include four journal articles and numerous book reviews in the Journal of the History of Philosophy and elsewhere.

"Rosalind Carey's new book, Russell and Wittgenstein on the Nature of Judgement, offers a fresh look at Wittgenstein's fateful but notoriously obscure criticisms of Russell's so-called ‘multiple-relation theory of judgement', offered in May-June of 1913 as Russell was hastily composing the Theory of Knowledge manuscript...Carey's book is well researched, well written, and makes a thorough and powerful case for its central thesis. Without a doubt, it constitutes an important contribution to both the scholarship addressing this key event within the history of analytics philosophy in particular, and that concerning Russell's work more generally...Carey develops a formidable case for her reconstruction, which is backed up by painstaking research and insightful analysis. Most importantly, Carey offers what seems to me to be a both novel and illuminating perspective on these events, one which promises to enliven scholarly debate on the matter for years to come." -James Connelly, Russell: the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies, Winter 2008-09

• Introduction: The Dialogue With Wittgenstein and Its; Background; 1: Wittgenstein's January Letter, Relations and Logical Data; 2: Understanding, Belief, and The Problem Of Falsehood; 3: Negative Facts, Bipolarity, and The June Letter. Appendices:; Correspondence and Notes; Bibliography; Index.