Kung-Chung Liu is Lee Kong Chian Professor of Law (Practice), Director of the Applied Research Centre for Intellectual Assets and the Law in Asia (ARCIALA) at Singapore Management University and also Professor at Renmin University of China.Reto M. Hilty is Professor and Director of Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Germany.

• 1. Introduction: As a Matter of Standard for Asia and Beyond? Part 1: The Formation of Standards and Some Economic Observations 2. De facto Standards 3. De Jure Standard Setting in the Telecom Industry: Its Evolution and the Developing Country Case for Reform 4. Standard Setting Organizations, Standard-Essential Patents and FRAND Terms: An Economic Observation Part 2: Beneficiaries and Enforcement of FRAND Declarations/Commitment 5. US Perspectives 6. Asian Perspectives 7. UK Perspectives Part 3: Asian Case Law and Global Experiences 8. Unprepared, Unable and Unwilling to Deal with FRAND Licensing of SEPs in Taiwan 9. Japan 10. Korea 11. IPR Protection and Antitrust Regulation of SEPs in China 12. Standard Essential Patents and FRAND Licensing: A View from India 13. The Paradox of Relief: Reconciling Remedies in Patent Law and Competition Law for FRAND Cases in India 14. FRAND as a Legal Concept at the Intersection between Competition Law and Intellectual Property Law: The Road Ahead for Singapore? 15. European Experiences: EU and Germany Part 4: Regulated Self-regulation 16. Stakeholders’ Views on Policy Concerns and Regulatory Framework for Self-regulation by SSOs 17. Propositions for Regulated Self-regulation of SSOs

Kung-Chung Liu is Lee Kong Chian Professor of Law (Practice), Director of the Applied Research Centre for Intellectual Assets and the Law in Asia (ARCIALA) at Singapore Management University and also Professor at Renmin University of China.Reto M. Hilty is Professor and Director of Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Germany.

• 1. Introduction: As a Matter of Standard for Asia and Beyond? Part 1: The Formation of Standards and Some Economic Observations 2. De facto Standards 3. De Jure Standard Setting in the Telecom Industry: Its Evolution and the Developing Country Case for Reform 4. Standard Setting Organizations, Standard-Essential Patents and FRAND Terms: An Economic Observation Part 2: Beneficiaries and Enforcement of FRAND Declarations/Commitment 5. US Perspectives 6. Asian Perspectives 7. UK Perspectives Part 3: Asian Case Law and Global Experiences 8. Unprepared, Unable and Unwilling to Deal with FRAND Licensing of SEPs in Taiwan 9. Japan 10. Korea 11. IPR Protection and Antitrust Regulation of SEPs in China 12. Standard Essential Patents and FRAND Licensing: A View from India 13. The Paradox of Relief: Reconciling Remedies in Patent Law and Competition Law for FRAND Cases in India 14. FRAND as a Legal Concept at the Intersection between Competition Law and Intellectual Property Law: The Road Ahead for Singapore? 15. European Experiences: EU and Germany Part 4: Regulated Self-regulation 16. Stakeholders’ Views on Policy Concerns and Regulatory Framework for Self-regulation by SSOs 17. Propositions for Regulated Self-regulation of SSOs

Kung-Chung Liu is Lee Kong Chian Professor of Law (Practice), Director of the Applied Research Centre for Intellectual Assets and the Law in Asia (ARCIALA) at Singapore Management University and also Professor at Renmin University of China.Reto M. Hilty is Professor and Director of Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Germany.

• 1. Introduction: As a Matter of Standard for Asia and Beyond? Part 1: The Formation of Standards and Some Economic Observations 2. De facto Standards 3. De Jure Standard Setting in the Telecom Industry: Its Evolution and the Developing Country Case for Reform 4. Standard Setting Organizations, Standard-Essential Patents and FRAND Terms: An Economic Observation Part 2: Beneficiaries and Enforcement of FRAND Declarations/Commitment 5. US Perspectives 6. Asian Perspectives 7. UK Perspectives Part 3: Asian Case Law and Global Experiences 8. Unprepared, Unable and Unwilling to Deal with FRAND Licensing of SEPs in Taiwan 9. Japan 10. Korea 11. IPR Protection and Antitrust Regulation of SEPs in China 12. Standard Essential Patents and FRAND Licensing: A View from India 13. The Paradox of Relief: Reconciling Remedies in Patent Law and Competition Law for FRAND Cases in India 14. FRAND as a Legal Concept at the Intersection between Competition Law and Intellectual Property Law: The Road Ahead for Singapore? 15. European Experiences: EU and Germany Part 4: Regulated Self-regulation 16. Stakeholders’ Views on Policy Concerns and Regulatory Framework for Self-regulation by SSOs 17. Propositions for Regulated Self-regulation of SSOs