Jonas I. Hein is a Researcher at the Institute of Geography, Kiel University, Germany and Associate Researcher at the German Development Institute/ Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik in Bonn, Germany. He completed his PhD in Human Geography at the University of Goettingen, Germany.

Select Guide Rating

• 1. Introduction 2. Conceptual, theoretical and methodological underpinning for a political ecology of transnational agrarian conflicts 3. Rescaling of the governance of forests and land in Indonesia 4. REDD+, Privatization and transnationalization of conservation in Indonesia 5. Transnationalized agrarian conflicts in the REDD+ 6. Conclusion: Towards a political ecology of transnational agrarian conflicts

Jonas I. Hein is a Researcher at the Institute of Geography, Kiel University, Germany and Associate Researcher at the German Development Institute/ Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik in Bonn, Germany. He completed his PhD in Human Geography at the University of Goettingen, Germany.

Select Guide Rating

• 1. Introduction 2. Conceptual, theoretical and methodological underpinning for a political ecology of transnational agrarian conflicts 3. Rescaling of the governance of forests and land in Indonesia 4. REDD+, Privatization and transnationalization of conservation in Indonesia 5. Transnationalized agrarian conflicts in the REDD+ 6. Conclusion: Towards a political ecology of transnational agrarian conflicts

Jonas I. Hein is a Researcher at the Institute of Geography, Kiel University, Germany and Associate Researcher at the German Development Institute/ Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik in Bonn, Germany. He completed his PhD in Human Geography at the University of Goettingen, Germany.

Select Guide Rating

• 1. Introduction 2. Conceptual, theoretical and methodological underpinning for a political ecology of transnational agrarian conflicts 3. Rescaling of the governance of forests and land in Indonesia 4. REDD+, Privatization and transnationalization of conservation in Indonesia 5. Transnationalized agrarian conflicts in the REDD+ 6. Conclusion: Towards a political ecology of transnational agrarian conflicts