Expert Expert Witness

Stanley L. Brodsky, PhD, is a professor in the Department of Psychology at The University of Alabama. He has written 14 books and about 250 articles, mostly in psychology applied to the law. He has received distinguished achievement awards from the American Psychology-Law Society, The International Association of Forensic and Correctional Psychology, and other scholarly and professional societies. He is a frequent leader of workshops based on his book Testifying in Court. In 2 3 he was a Visiting Fellow in the Program in Psychiatry and the Law of Harvard Medical School.  Dr. Brodsky has been a visiting fellow at universities in New Zealand, India, Israel, and England.Thomas G. Gutheil, MD, is a professor of psychiatry in the Department of Psychiatry at Beth Israel-Deaconess Medical Center and cofounder of the Program in Psychiatry and the Law at Harvard Medical School he is the first professor of psychiatry in the history of Harvard Medical School to be certified in both general and forensic psychiatry. A recipient of every major award in the forensic field and multiple teaching and writing awards, Dr. Gutheil has authored or coauthored more than 3 publications in the national and international forensic literature. He is past president of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law and the International Academy of Law and Mental Health. Associated with the Massachusetts Mental Health Center for a half-century. Dr. Gutheil lives and works in the Boston area.

"The Expert Expert Witness: More Maxims and Guidelines for Testifying in Court is but the most recent addition to a truly impressive legacy and should be considered essential reading for students and practicing psychologists and psychiatrists-especially since it is quite likely that sometime in the course of their professional careers they will be called upon to give testimony in a court with respect to a client or patient." - Midwest Book Review "The essence of this book comes from the extensive expertise of the authors, its practical focus, clear articulation and utility... I recommend reading the entire book so that you do not miss any of the sage advice." -New England Psychologist

• PrefaceIntroductionApologiesArbitrary PigeonholesAsked and AnsweredBoundaries Between Expert Witness Roles and Trial ConsultationConfabulationsConsistent ExpertsContextDirected FeedbackDiscovery and DiscoveriesEthics in Expert TestimonyEvasive Responses: Hopeless But Not SeriousExperience Does Not CountExpert Witness as Master TeacherFact WitnessesFrames of ReferenceGender-Intrusive QuestionsGotcha and GoodbyeHoly Mackerel, Man!Illusory DocumentationIntegrity ChecksLanguage: It's a VirusLawyer Bashing and Lawyer JokesLe Mot JusteLost and BefuddledLow PitchesMetatestimonyOffensive LanguageOffensive QuestionsPersonal Attacks: OverviewPersonal Attacks: Demeaning AttorneysPersonal Attacks: Internet VulnerabilitiesPersonal Attacks: TaintsPulling and the Push - PullReal and Apparent AmbiguitiesRecording of AssessmentsSayonara SolutionsSilent TreatmentsSleight of HandSocial Construction of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and DangerousnessSpontaneity and Alertness on the StandSwoop and PerchTelephoned and Videorecorded TestimonyThank You, Thank You, Thank YouTheir Words in Our MouthsTightrope WalkingTo Faint, To Weep, To Blank OutTraps of Common SenseTrue Grit and FalseUltimate Opinion TestimonyWell Beyond TestimonyWhat We Like to See in an Expert Witness - And What We Don'tSuggested Readings: More of ThisReferencesIndexAbout the Authors