Benedita Menezes Queiroz is a Teaching Assistant at the School of Transnational Governance of the European University Institute, Florence and Senior Research Fellow at CIDP - Lisbon Centre for Research in Public Law.

Illegally Staying in the EU contributes to the migration and criminology of mobility literature by providing a meticulous conceptual and legal analysis of illegality. Queiroz does admirable work in bringing what are often ideological debates about irregular migration in the EU back to the reality of our legal systems.

• 1. ‘What Part of Illegality Don’t You Understand?’: Illegality in EU Migration Law I. Introduction II. Conceptual Analysis III. Legal Sources IV. EU Institutional Framework V. Conclusion 2. The Case of Unlawfully-staying EU Citizens I. Introduction II. Illegally-staying Third-country Nationals and Unlawfully-staying EU Citizens III. Conclusion 3. Non-removable Migrants in the EU I. Introduction II. The Definition and the Causes of the Non-removability of Irregular Migrants in EU Law III. The Atypical Status of Non-removable Irregular Migrants IV. The Remedies for Non-removability: National and European Perspectives V. Conclusion 4. The Potential Effects of Information Technology Vis-à-Vis Illegality I. Introduction II. EU Immigration Databases Under Construction III. The Erosion of the Purpose Limitation Principle IV. Enhanced Accessibility versus Proportionality and Necessity Concerns V. From Immigration to General Intelligence Databases? VI. What’s Next for Immigration Information Systems? A Brand New World of Transnational Surveillance of Illegality or the Same Old Story? VII. The Era of Potential Digital Criminalisation of Illegally-staying Third-country Nationals VIII. Conclusion 5. Access to Legality in the EU: An Instrumental or Corrective Mechanism?I. Introduction II. Access to Legality in EU Migration Law: The Definition, Instrumental Use and Corrective Potential III. Part I: The Instrumentalisation of the Access to Legality IV. Part II: The Potential Corrective Role of Access to Legality at the Supranational Level V. The Corrective Function of Regulating Legality from an EU Law Perspective VI. Conclusion

Benedita Menezes Queiroz is a Teaching Assistant at the School of Transnational Governance of the European University Institute, Florence and Senior Research Fellow at CIDP - Lisbon Centre for Research in Public Law.

Illegally Staying in the EU contributes to the migration and criminology of mobility literature by providing a meticulous conceptual and legal analysis of illegality. Queiroz does admirable work in bringing what are often ideological debates about irregular migration in the EU back to the reality of our legal systems.

• 1. ‘What Part of Illegality Don’t You Understand?’: Illegality in EU Migration Law I. Introduction II. Conceptual Analysis III. Legal Sources IV. EU Institutional Framework V. Conclusion 2. The Case of Unlawfully-staying EU Citizens I. Introduction II. Illegally-staying Third-country Nationals and Unlawfully-staying EU Citizens III. Conclusion 3. Non-removable Migrants in the EU I. Introduction II. The Definition and the Causes of the Non-removability of Irregular Migrants in EU Law III. The Atypical Status of Non-removable Irregular Migrants IV. The Remedies for Non-removability: National and European Perspectives V. Conclusion 4. The Potential Effects of Information Technology Vis-à-Vis Illegality I. Introduction II. EU Immigration Databases Under Construction III. The Erosion of the Purpose Limitation Principle IV. Enhanced Accessibility versus Proportionality and Necessity Concerns V. From Immigration to General Intelligence Databases? VI. What’s Next for Immigration Information Systems? A Brand New World of Transnational Surveillance of Illegality or the Same Old Story? VII. The Era of Potential Digital Criminalisation of Illegally-staying Third-country Nationals VIII. Conclusion 5. Access to Legality in the EU: An Instrumental or Corrective Mechanism?I. Introduction II. Access to Legality in EU Migration Law: The Definition, Instrumental Use and Corrective Potential III. Part I: The Instrumentalisation of the Access to Legality IV. Part II: The Potential Corrective Role of Access to Legality at the Supranational Level V. The Corrective Function of Regulating Legality from an EU Law Perspective VI. Conclusion

Benedita Menezes Queiroz is a Teaching Assistant at the School of Transnational Governance of the European University Institute, Florence and Senior Research Fellow at CIDP - Lisbon Centre for Research in Public Law.

Illegally Staying in the EU contributes to the migration and criminology of mobility literature by providing a meticulous conceptual and legal analysis of illegality. Queiroz does admirable work in bringing what are often ideological debates about irregular migration in the EU back to the reality of our legal systems.

• 1. ‘What Part of Illegality Don’t You Understand?’: Illegality in EU Migration Law I. Introduction II. Conceptual Analysis III. Legal Sources IV. EU Institutional Framework V. Conclusion 2. The Case of Unlawfully-staying EU Citizens I. Introduction II. Illegally-staying Third-country Nationals and Unlawfully-staying EU Citizens III. Conclusion 3. Non-removable Migrants in the EU I. Introduction II. The Definition and the Causes of the Non-removability of Irregular Migrants in EU Law III. The Atypical Status of Non-removable Irregular Migrants IV. The Remedies for Non-removability: National and European Perspectives V. Conclusion 4. The Potential Effects of Information Technology Vis-à-Vis Illegality I. Introduction II. EU Immigration Databases Under Construction III. The Erosion of the Purpose Limitation Principle IV. Enhanced Accessibility versus Proportionality and Necessity Concerns V. From Immigration to General Intelligence Databases? VI. What’s Next for Immigration Information Systems? A Brand New World of Transnational Surveillance of Illegality or the Same Old Story? VII. The Era of Potential Digital Criminalisation of Illegally-staying Third-country Nationals VIII. Conclusion 5. Access to Legality in the EU: An Instrumental or Corrective Mechanism?I. Introduction II. Access to Legality in EU Migration Law: The Definition, Instrumental Use and Corrective Potential III. Part I: The Instrumentalisation of the Access to Legality IV. Part II: The Potential Corrective Role of Access to Legality at the Supranational Level V. The Corrective Function of Regulating Legality from an EU Law Perspective VI. Conclusion