Burkard Hess is Director of the Department of European and Comparative Law, MPI Luxembourg.Koen Lenaerts is President of the Court of Justice of the European Union and Professor of European Law at the University of Leuven.

• Seminal Judgments (les Grands Arrets) in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice Burkhard HessLa confiance mutuelle, fondement et temoignage de la valeur de l’Union europeenne Camelia ToaderDe l’encadrement de l’ordre public procedural des Etats membres a l’ordre procedural autonome de l’Union Marek Safjan et Dominik DusterhausEU Private International Law: Consistency of the Scopes of Application and/or of the Solutions Maciej SzpunarLe « regime Bruxelles » dans le droit europeen de la procedure civile Marta Requejo IsidroThe Shift from a Choice of Law-Centred Approach to a Civil Procedure Standpoint Sabine CorneloupThe Contribution of ‘Brussels I’ to the Process of EU Integration: a True Trailblazer for the Europeanization and Constitutionalization of Private International Law Johan MeeusenThe Application of the European Law of Civil Procedure in the Dialogue Between the CJEU and the National Judges Henrik Saugmandsgaard OeThe Dialogue on the European Law of Civil Procedure between the Court of Justice and National Courts from a German Perspective Wolfgang HauEuropean Civil Procedure and the Dialogue between National Courts and the European Court of Justice Xandra Kramer & Jos HoevenaarsL’autonomie procedurale dans la jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l’Union europeenne – Reflexions naives d’un Huron au Palais du Kirchberg Loic CadietLa Charte des droits fondamentaux et les nouvelles frontieres de l’autonomie procedurale des Etats membres L’exemple du droit europeen de la procedure civile Michail VilarasThe Brussels Convention: 50 Years of Contribution to European Integration Fausto PocarDelendum est Forum Delicti? Towards the Jurisdictional Protection of the Alleged Victim in Cross-Border Torts Etienne FarnouxCJEU Case-Law and Forum Connexitatis: an Analysis of the Close Connection Criterion Lucilla GalantiCross-border Collective Redress and the Jurisdictional Regime: Horizontal vs Sectoral Approach Cinzia PeraroYour Place? Mine? Or Theirs? A Legal and Policy-orientated Analysis of Jurisdiction in Cross-Border Collective Redress Stephanie LawRepresentative (Consumer) Collective Redress Decisions in the EU: Free Movement or Public Policy Obstacles? Janek Tomasz NowakCasting the Net: Has the Court of Justice’s Approach to Online Torts Made the Brussels Framework Fit for the Internet Age? Tobias LutziEncoding Justice: A Quest for Facilitating Access to Justice by e-Handling of Cross-Border Litigation. The Example of the European Uniform Procedures Elena Alina OntanuTrust, but Verify. Loss of Mutual Trust as a Ground for Non-Recognition in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. Example of the Judiciary Crisis in Poland Zuzanna Witek

Burkard Hess is Director of the Department of European and Comparative Law, MPI Luxembourg.Koen Lenaerts is President of the Court of Justice of the European Union and Professor of European Law at the University of Leuven.

• Seminal Judgments (les Grands Arrets) in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice Burkhard HessLa confiance mutuelle, fondement et temoignage de la valeur de l’Union europeenne Camelia ToaderDe l’encadrement de l’ordre public procedural des Etats membres a l’ordre procedural autonome de l’Union Marek Safjan et Dominik DusterhausEU Private International Law: Consistency of the Scopes of Application and/or of the Solutions Maciej SzpunarLe « regime Bruxelles » dans le droit europeen de la procedure civile Marta Requejo IsidroThe Shift from a Choice of Law-Centred Approach to a Civil Procedure Standpoint Sabine CorneloupThe Contribution of ‘Brussels I’ to the Process of EU Integration: a True Trailblazer for the Europeanization and Constitutionalization of Private International Law Johan MeeusenThe Application of the European Law of Civil Procedure in the Dialogue Between the CJEU and the National Judges Henrik Saugmandsgaard OeThe Dialogue on the European Law of Civil Procedure between the Court of Justice and National Courts from a German Perspective Wolfgang HauEuropean Civil Procedure and the Dialogue between National Courts and the European Court of Justice Xandra Kramer & Jos HoevenaarsL’autonomie procedurale dans la jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l’Union europeenne – Reflexions naives d’un Huron au Palais du Kirchberg Loic CadietLa Charte des droits fondamentaux et les nouvelles frontieres de l’autonomie procedurale des Etats membres L’exemple du droit europeen de la procedure civile Michail VilarasThe Brussels Convention: 50 Years of Contribution to European Integration Fausto PocarDelendum est Forum Delicti? Towards the Jurisdictional Protection of the Alleged Victim in Cross-Border Torts Etienne FarnouxCJEU Case-Law and Forum Connexitatis: an Analysis of the Close Connection Criterion Lucilla GalantiCross-border Collective Redress and the Jurisdictional Regime: Horizontal vs Sectoral Approach Cinzia PeraroYour Place? Mine? Or Theirs? A Legal and Policy-orientated Analysis of Jurisdiction in Cross-Border Collective Redress Stephanie LawRepresentative (Consumer) Collective Redress Decisions in the EU: Free Movement or Public Policy Obstacles? Janek Tomasz NowakCasting the Net: Has the Court of Justice’s Approach to Online Torts Made the Brussels Framework Fit for the Internet Age? Tobias LutziEncoding Justice: A Quest for Facilitating Access to Justice by e-Handling of Cross-Border Litigation. The Example of the European Uniform Procedures Elena Alina OntanuTrust, but Verify. Loss of Mutual Trust as a Ground for Non-Recognition in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. Example of the Judiciary Crisis in Poland Zuzanna Witek

Burkard Hess is Director of the Department of European and Comparative Law, MPI Luxembourg.Koen Lenaerts is President of the Court of Justice of the European Union and Professor of European Law at the University of Leuven.

• Seminal Judgments (les Grands Arrets) in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice Burkhard HessLa confiance mutuelle, fondement et temoignage de la valeur de l’Union europeenne Camelia ToaderDe l’encadrement de l’ordre public procedural des Etats membres a l’ordre procedural autonome de l’Union Marek Safjan et Dominik DusterhausEU Private International Law: Consistency of the Scopes of Application and/or of the Solutions Maciej SzpunarLe « regime Bruxelles » dans le droit europeen de la procedure civile Marta Requejo IsidroThe Shift from a Choice of Law-Centred Approach to a Civil Procedure Standpoint Sabine CorneloupThe Contribution of ‘Brussels I’ to the Process of EU Integration: a True Trailblazer for the Europeanization and Constitutionalization of Private International Law Johan MeeusenThe Application of the European Law of Civil Procedure in the Dialogue Between the CJEU and the National Judges Henrik Saugmandsgaard OeThe Dialogue on the European Law of Civil Procedure between the Court of Justice and National Courts from a German Perspective Wolfgang HauEuropean Civil Procedure and the Dialogue between National Courts and the European Court of Justice Xandra Kramer & Jos HoevenaarsL’autonomie procedurale dans la jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l’Union europeenne – Reflexions naives d’un Huron au Palais du Kirchberg Loic CadietLa Charte des droits fondamentaux et les nouvelles frontieres de l’autonomie procedurale des Etats membres L’exemple du droit europeen de la procedure civile Michail VilarasThe Brussels Convention: 50 Years of Contribution to European Integration Fausto PocarDelendum est Forum Delicti? Towards the Jurisdictional Protection of the Alleged Victim in Cross-Border Torts Etienne FarnouxCJEU Case-Law and Forum Connexitatis: an Analysis of the Close Connection Criterion Lucilla GalantiCross-border Collective Redress and the Jurisdictional Regime: Horizontal vs Sectoral Approach Cinzia PeraroYour Place? Mine? Or Theirs? A Legal and Policy-orientated Analysis of Jurisdiction in Cross-Border Collective Redress Stephanie LawRepresentative (Consumer) Collective Redress Decisions in the EU: Free Movement or Public Policy Obstacles? Janek Tomasz NowakCasting the Net: Has the Court of Justice’s Approach to Online Torts Made the Brussels Framework Fit for the Internet Age? Tobias LutziEncoding Justice: A Quest for Facilitating Access to Justice by e-Handling of Cross-Border Litigation. The Example of the European Uniform Procedures Elena Alina OntanuTrust, but Verify. Loss of Mutual Trust as a Ground for Non-Recognition in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. Example of the Judiciary Crisis in Poland Zuzanna Witek