Emmanouil Billis is Research Group Leader at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law in Freiburg, Germany.Nandor Knust is Associate Professor of Law at the University of Tromsø, Norway.Jon Petter Rui is Professor of Law at the University of Bergen, Norway.

• PART ICONCEPTUALISING PROPORTIONALITY1. The Typology of Proportionality Emmanouil Billis, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law, Germany, Nandor Knust, University of Tromsø, Norway, and Jon Petter Rui, University of Bergen, Norway2. Proportionality and the Criminal Law: Proportionality of What to What? R A Duff, University of Stirling, UK3. Proportionality and the Bindingness of Fundamental Rights Ralf Poscher, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law, Germany4. The Contribution of Fuzzy Logic and Comparative Concepts to the Rational Application of Proportionality Stricto Sensu Christos Mylonopoulos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece5. The Emotional Component of Proportionality Thomas Elholm, University of Copenhagen, Denmark6. The Principle of Proportionality: Tracing its Historical Evolution Nestor Courakis, University of Nicosia, Cyprus, and Vagia Polyzoidou, University of Nicosia, CyprusPART IIAPPLYING PROPORTIONALITY: NATIONAL PARADIGMS7. Ends and Means: Why Effective Counter-Terrorism Requires Respect for Proportionality and Rights Lucia Zedner, University of Oxford, UK8. Contrasting Penal and Non-Penal Responses to Terrorism: Proportionality and Human Rights in the UK John Jackson, University of Nottingham, UK9. Big Data and Criminal Justice. Proportionality, Efficiency and Risk in a Global Context Richard Vogler, University of Sussex, UK10. Proportionality Paradigm or Paradox? The Proportionality Principle in American and German Security Law Jurisprudence Russell A Miller, Washington & Lee University, USA11. Effectiveness, Proportionality and the Abstract and Concrete Forms of Decriminalisation. The Example of Italy Konstanze Jarvers, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law, Germany12. Promoting Retributive Proportionality Through Sentencing Guidelines Julian V Roberts, University of Oxford, UK13. Proportionality in Asset Confiscation Proceedings Johan Boucht, University of Oslo, NorwayPART IIIAPPLYING PROPORTIONALITY: INTERNATIONAL PARADIGMS14. The Proportionality Principle in Comparative Public, European Union and International Law – Reflections on the ‘Proportionality Equation’ Michael Bothe, University of Frankfurt, Germany, and Emanuela-Chiara Gillard, Oxford Institute for Ethics, Law and Armed Conflict, UK15. Proportionality and Efficiency in Sentencing under International Criminal Law Thomas Weigend, University of Cologne, Germany16. Proportionality, Mass Surveillance and Criminal Investigation: The Strasbourg Court Facing Big Brother Lorena Bachmaier Winter, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain17. Proportionality Issues in European Arrest Warrant Proceedings – Three Stories from the Field Ilias Anagnostopoulos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece

Emmanouil Billis is Research Group Leader at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law in Freiburg, Germany.Nandor Knust is Associate Professor of Law at the University of Tromsø, Norway.Jon Petter Rui is Professor of Law at the University of Bergen, Norway.

• PART ICONCEPTUALISING PROPORTIONALITY1. The Typology of Proportionality Emmanouil Billis, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law, Germany, Nandor Knust, University of Tromsø, Norway, and Jon Petter Rui, University of Bergen, Norway2. Proportionality and the Criminal Law: Proportionality of What to What? R A Duff, University of Stirling, UK3. Proportionality and the Bindingness of Fundamental Rights Ralf Poscher, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law, Germany4. The Contribution of Fuzzy Logic and Comparative Concepts to the Rational Application of Proportionality Stricto Sensu Christos Mylonopoulos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece5. The Emotional Component of Proportionality Thomas Elholm, University of Copenhagen, Denmark6. The Principle of Proportionality: Tracing its Historical Evolution Nestor Courakis, University of Nicosia, Cyprus, and Vagia Polyzoidou, University of Nicosia, CyprusPART IIAPPLYING PROPORTIONALITY: NATIONAL PARADIGMS7. Ends and Means: Why Effective Counter-Terrorism Requires Respect for Proportionality and Rights Lucia Zedner, University of Oxford, UK8. Contrasting Penal and Non-Penal Responses to Terrorism: Proportionality and Human Rights in the UK John Jackson, University of Nottingham, UK9. Big Data and Criminal Justice. Proportionality, Efficiency and Risk in a Global Context Richard Vogler, University of Sussex, UK10. Proportionality Paradigm or Paradox? The Proportionality Principle in American and German Security Law Jurisprudence Russell A Miller, Washington & Lee University, USA11. Effectiveness, Proportionality and the Abstract and Concrete Forms of Decriminalisation. The Example of Italy Konstanze Jarvers, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law, Germany12. Promoting Retributive Proportionality Through Sentencing Guidelines Julian V Roberts, University of Oxford, UK13. Proportionality in Asset Confiscation Proceedings Johan Boucht, University of Oslo, NorwayPART IIIAPPLYING PROPORTIONALITY: INTERNATIONAL PARADIGMS14. The Proportionality Principle in Comparative Public, European Union and International Law – Reflections on the ‘Proportionality Equation’ Michael Bothe, University of Frankfurt, Germany, and Emanuela-Chiara Gillard, Oxford Institute for Ethics, Law and Armed Conflict, UK15. Proportionality and Efficiency in Sentencing under International Criminal Law Thomas Weigend, University of Cologne, Germany16. Proportionality, Mass Surveillance and Criminal Investigation: The Strasbourg Court Facing Big Brother Lorena Bachmaier Winter, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain17. Proportionality Issues in European Arrest Warrant Proceedings – Three Stories from the Field Ilias Anagnostopoulos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece

Emmanouil Billis is Research Group Leader at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law in Freiburg, Germany.Nandor Knust is Associate Professor of Law at the University of Tromsø, Norway.Jon Petter Rui is Professor of Law at the University of Bergen, Norway.

• PART ICONCEPTUALISING PROPORTIONALITY1. The Typology of Proportionality Emmanouil Billis, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law, Germany, Nandor Knust, University of Tromsø, Norway, and Jon Petter Rui, University of Bergen, Norway2. Proportionality and the Criminal Law: Proportionality of What to What? R A Duff, University of Stirling, UK3. Proportionality and the Bindingness of Fundamental Rights Ralf Poscher, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law, Germany4. The Contribution of Fuzzy Logic and Comparative Concepts to the Rational Application of Proportionality Stricto Sensu Christos Mylonopoulos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece5. The Emotional Component of Proportionality Thomas Elholm, University of Copenhagen, Denmark6. The Principle of Proportionality: Tracing its Historical Evolution Nestor Courakis, University of Nicosia, Cyprus, and Vagia Polyzoidou, University of Nicosia, CyprusPART IIAPPLYING PROPORTIONALITY: NATIONAL PARADIGMS7. Ends and Means: Why Effective Counter-Terrorism Requires Respect for Proportionality and Rights Lucia Zedner, University of Oxford, UK8. Contrasting Penal and Non-Penal Responses to Terrorism: Proportionality and Human Rights in the UK John Jackson, University of Nottingham, UK9. Big Data and Criminal Justice. Proportionality, Efficiency and Risk in a Global Context Richard Vogler, University of Sussex, UK10. Proportionality Paradigm or Paradox? The Proportionality Principle in American and German Security Law Jurisprudence Russell A Miller, Washington & Lee University, USA11. Effectiveness, Proportionality and the Abstract and Concrete Forms of Decriminalisation. The Example of Italy Konstanze Jarvers, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law, Germany12. Promoting Retributive Proportionality Through Sentencing Guidelines Julian V Roberts, University of Oxford, UK13. Proportionality in Asset Confiscation Proceedings Johan Boucht, University of Oslo, NorwayPART IIIAPPLYING PROPORTIONALITY: INTERNATIONAL PARADIGMS14. The Proportionality Principle in Comparative Public, European Union and International Law – Reflections on the ‘Proportionality Equation’ Michael Bothe, University of Frankfurt, Germany, and Emanuela-Chiara Gillard, Oxford Institute for Ethics, Law and Armed Conflict, UK15. Proportionality and Efficiency in Sentencing under International Criminal Law Thomas Weigend, University of Cologne, Germany16. Proportionality, Mass Surveillance and Criminal Investigation: The Strasbourg Court Facing Big Brother Lorena Bachmaier Winter, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain17. Proportionality Issues in European Arrest Warrant Proceedings – Three Stories from the Field Ilias Anagnostopoulos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece