Lee Jarvis is Professor of Security and Society at Adelaide University Stuart Macdonald is Professor of Law at Swansea UniversityAndrew Whiting is Senior Lecturer in Criminology at Royal Holloway, University of London

'In their timely new book, Jarvis, Macdonald, and Whiting offer a rich and nuanced analysis of the vernacular understandings and experiences of counter-radicalization initiatives such as the UK’s controversial Prevent program. What emerges is a complex picture in which the language of radicalization retains conceptual resilience despite profound criticisms, and the strategy itself elicits both support and frustration from citizens who both recognize the security challenge confronted yet remain sceptical of the framework employed to address it. This book makes multiple important contributions, methodologically in its application of ‘vernacular security’, analytically in its revealing of everyday politics, and normatively in providing space for subjugated narratives on this divisive arena of public policy. It deserves to become essential reading for scholars across political science, legal studies, sociology, criminology, and beyond with interests in critical security studies, counter-terrorism, and citizenship.'Tahir Abbas, Professor of Radicalisation Studies, Leiden University, Netherlands'This book is the first of its kind to interrogate the various ways in which ordinary people understand radicalisation as a concept within the UK, and it explores what they make of government policies and interventions such as Prevent. Its ‘bottom-up’ approach corrects the elitist tendencies within existing work on radicalisation and violent extremism. The book will be very valuable to students, academics and practitioners who are interested in what people know about radicalisation and violent extremism and the claims that they make in their engagement with ‘top-down’ policies and discourses.'Akin Oyawale, University of Warwick'Counter-radicalisation policies are increasingly fundamental to the provision of national security. To be successful, they also, crucially, rely upon public support and engagement. As the first sustained analysis of citizen understandings of radicalisation and counter-radicalisation this book will be essential reading for policymakers, practitioners and others seeking to understand how programmes like Prevent are experienced and evaluated in everyday life within the United Kingdom and beyond.'Anne Aly, Member of the Australian Parliament

• Introduction 1 Prevent and (Counter-)Radicalisation2 Vernacular Security and (Counter-)Radicalisation3 Radicalisation and/in the Vernacular4 Knowing Prevent5 Evaluating Prevent6 Theorising (Counter-)Radicalisation in the VernacularConclusion

Lee Jarvis is Professor of Security and Society at Adelaide University Stuart Macdonald is Professor of Law at Swansea UniversityAndrew Whiting is Senior Lecturer in Criminology at Royal Holloway, University of London

'In their timely new book, Jarvis, Macdonald, and Whiting offer a rich and nuanced analysis of the vernacular understandings and experiences of counter-radicalization initiatives such as the UK’s controversial Prevent program. What emerges is a complex picture in which the language of radicalization retains conceptual resilience despite profound criticisms, and the strategy itself elicits both support and frustration from citizens who both recognize the security challenge confronted yet remain sceptical of the framework employed to address it. This book makes multiple important contributions, methodologically in its application of ‘vernacular security’, analytically in its revealing of everyday politics, and normatively in providing space for subjugated narratives on this divisive arena of public policy. It deserves to become essential reading for scholars across political science, legal studies, sociology, criminology, and beyond with interests in critical security studies, counter-terrorism, and citizenship.'Tahir Abbas, Professor of Radicalisation Studies, Leiden University, Netherlands'This book is the first of its kind to interrogate the various ways in which ordinary people understand radicalisation as a concept within the UK, and it explores what they make of government policies and interventions such as Prevent. Its ‘bottom-up’ approach corrects the elitist tendencies within existing work on radicalisation and violent extremism. The book will be very valuable to students, academics and practitioners who are interested in what people know about radicalisation and violent extremism and the claims that they make in their engagement with ‘top-down’ policies and discourses.'Akin Oyawale, University of Warwick'Counter-radicalisation policies are increasingly fundamental to the provision of national security. To be successful, they also, crucially, rely upon public support and engagement. As the first sustained analysis of citizen understandings of radicalisation and counter-radicalisation this book will be essential reading for policymakers, practitioners and others seeking to understand how programmes like Prevent are experienced and evaluated in everyday life within the United Kingdom and beyond.'Anne Aly, Member of the Australian Parliament

• Introduction 1 Prevent and (Counter-)Radicalisation2 Vernacular Security and (Counter-)Radicalisation3 Radicalisation and/in the Vernacular4 Knowing Prevent5 Evaluating Prevent6 Theorising (Counter-)Radicalisation in the VernacularConclusion

Lee Jarvis is Professor of Security and Society at Adelaide University Stuart Macdonald is Professor of Law at Swansea UniversityAndrew Whiting is Senior Lecturer in Criminology at Royal Holloway, University of London

'In their timely new book, Jarvis, Macdonald, and Whiting offer a rich and nuanced analysis of the vernacular understandings and experiences of counter-radicalization initiatives such as the UK’s controversial Prevent program. What emerges is a complex picture in which the language of radicalization retains conceptual resilience despite profound criticisms, and the strategy itself elicits both support and frustration from citizens who both recognize the security challenge confronted yet remain sceptical of the framework employed to address it. This book makes multiple important contributions, methodologically in its application of ‘vernacular security’, analytically in its revealing of everyday politics, and normatively in providing space for subjugated narratives on this divisive arena of public policy. It deserves to become essential reading for scholars across political science, legal studies, sociology, criminology, and beyond with interests in critical security studies, counter-terrorism, and citizenship.'Tahir Abbas, Professor of Radicalisation Studies, Leiden University, Netherlands'This book is the first of its kind to interrogate the various ways in which ordinary people understand radicalisation as a concept within the UK, and it explores what they make of government policies and interventions such as Prevent. Its ‘bottom-up’ approach corrects the elitist tendencies within existing work on radicalisation and violent extremism. The book will be very valuable to students, academics and practitioners who are interested in what people know about radicalisation and violent extremism and the claims that they make in their engagement with ‘top-down’ policies and discourses.'Akin Oyawale, University of Warwick'Counter-radicalisation policies are increasingly fundamental to the provision of national security. To be successful, they also, crucially, rely upon public support and engagement. As the first sustained analysis of citizen understandings of radicalisation and counter-radicalisation this book will be essential reading for policymakers, practitioners and others seeking to understand how programmes like Prevent are experienced and evaluated in everyday life within the United Kingdom and beyond.'Anne Aly, Member of the Australian Parliament

• Introduction 1 Prevent and (Counter-)Radicalisation2 Vernacular Security and (Counter-)Radicalisation3 Radicalisation and/in the Vernacular4 Knowing Prevent5 Evaluating Prevent6 Theorising (Counter-)Radicalisation in the VernacularConclusion