Leslie P. Willcocks is Professor of Technology, Work, and Globalization at the Department of Management at London School of Economics, UK.Chris Sauer is a senior tutor at Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, UK and an associate fellow of the Said Business School, UK.Mary C. Lacity is Curators' Professor of Information Systems and an International Business Fellow at the University of Missouri-St. Louis, US.

• Introduction –LeslieWillcocks, Chris Sauer and Mary Lacity.- PART IV. INTERPRETIVERESEARCH APPROACHES.- Chapter 11: Butler, T. (1998),“Towards a hermeneutical method for interpretative research in informationsystems,” JIT, Vol. 13, pp.285-300.- Chapter 12: Linden, T., andCybulski, J. (2009), “Application of hermeneutics to studying an experiencemining process,” JIT, Vol. 24, pp.231-250.- Chapter 13: Bygstad, B., andMunkvold, B.E., (2011), “Exploring the role of informants in interpretativecase study research in IS,” JIT, Vol.26, pp. 32-45.- Chapter 14: Bunker, D., Kautz,K.,  and A. Anhtuan, (2008), “An explorationof information systems adoption: tools and skills as cultural artefacts – thecase of a management information system,” JIT,Vol. 23, pp. 71-78.- Chapter 15: Hsu, Carol;Backhouse, James; Silva, Leiser, (2014), “Institutionalizing operational riskmanagement: an empirical study,” JIT,Vol. 29 59-72.- PART V. ACTION RESEARCH APPROACHES.- Chapter 16: Baskerville, R.,and Wood-Harper, A.T. (1996), “A critical perspective on action research as amethod for information systems research,” JIT,Vol. 11, pp. 235-246.- Chapter 17: Wastell, D.,McMaster, T., and Kawalek, P (2007), “The rise of the phoenix: methodologicalinnovation as a discourse of renewal,” JIT, Vol. 22, pp. 59-68.- Chapter 18: Hughes, J., andWood-Harper, T. (1999), “Systems development as a research act”, JIT, Vol. 14, pp. 83-94.

Leslie P. Willcocks is Professor of Technology, Work, and Globalization at the Department of Management at London School of Economics, UK.Chris Sauer is a senior tutor at Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, UK and an associate fellow of the Said Business School, UK.Mary C. Lacity is Curators' Professor of Information Systems and an International Business Fellow at the University of Missouri-St. Louis, US.

• Introduction –LeslieWillcocks, Chris Sauer and Mary Lacity.- PART IV. INTERPRETIVERESEARCH APPROACHES.- Chapter 11: Butler, T. (1998),“Towards a hermeneutical method for interpretative research in informationsystems,” JIT, Vol. 13, pp.285-300.- Chapter 12: Linden, T., andCybulski, J. (2009), “Application of hermeneutics to studying an experiencemining process,” JIT, Vol. 24, pp.231-250.- Chapter 13: Bygstad, B., andMunkvold, B.E., (2011), “Exploring the role of informants in interpretativecase study research in IS,” JIT, Vol.26, pp. 32-45.- Chapter 14: Bunker, D., Kautz,K.,  and A. Anhtuan, (2008), “An explorationof information systems adoption: tools and skills as cultural artefacts – thecase of a management information system,” JIT,Vol. 23, pp. 71-78.- Chapter 15: Hsu, Carol;Backhouse, James; Silva, Leiser, (2014), “Institutionalizing operational riskmanagement: an empirical study,” JIT,Vol. 29 59-72.- PART V. ACTION RESEARCH APPROACHES.- Chapter 16: Baskerville, R.,and Wood-Harper, A.T. (1996), “A critical perspective on action research as amethod for information systems research,” JIT,Vol. 11, pp. 235-246.- Chapter 17: Wastell, D.,McMaster, T., and Kawalek, P (2007), “The rise of the phoenix: methodologicalinnovation as a discourse of renewal,” JIT, Vol. 22, pp. 59-68.- Chapter 18: Hughes, J., andWood-Harper, T. (1999), “Systems development as a research act”, JIT, Vol. 14, pp. 83-94.

Leslie P. Willcocks is Professor of Technology, Work, and Globalization at the Department of Management at London School of Economics, UK.Chris Sauer is a senior tutor at Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, UK and an associate fellow of the Said Business School, UK.Mary C. Lacity is Curators' Professor of Information Systems and an International Business Fellow at the University of Missouri-St. Louis, US.

• Introduction –LeslieWillcocks, Chris Sauer and Mary Lacity.- PART IV. INTERPRETIVERESEARCH APPROACHES.- Chapter 11: Butler, T. (1998),“Towards a hermeneutical method for interpretative research in informationsystems,” JIT, Vol. 13, pp.285-300.- Chapter 12: Linden, T., andCybulski, J. (2009), “Application of hermeneutics to studying an experiencemining process,” JIT, Vol. 24, pp.231-250.- Chapter 13: Bygstad, B., andMunkvold, B.E., (2011), “Exploring the role of informants in interpretativecase study research in IS,” JIT, Vol.26, pp. 32-45.- Chapter 14: Bunker, D., Kautz,K.,  and A. Anhtuan, (2008), “An explorationof information systems adoption: tools and skills as cultural artefacts – thecase of a management information system,” JIT,Vol. 23, pp. 71-78.- Chapter 15: Hsu, Carol;Backhouse, James; Silva, Leiser, (2014), “Institutionalizing operational riskmanagement: an empirical study,” JIT,Vol. 29 59-72.- PART V. ACTION RESEARCH APPROACHES.- Chapter 16: Baskerville, R.,and Wood-Harper, A.T. (1996), “A critical perspective on action research as amethod for information systems research,” JIT,Vol. 11, pp. 235-246.- Chapter 17: Wastell, D.,McMaster, T., and Kawalek, P (2007), “The rise of the phoenix: methodologicalinnovation as a discourse of renewal,” JIT, Vol. 22, pp. 59-68.- Chapter 18: Hughes, J., andWood-Harper, T. (1999), “Systems development as a research act”, JIT, Vol. 14, pp. 83-94.