"Sharpe’s text has a depth to it which tells of the wealth of time, energy and research that has been poured into it. The work is one of very few attempting to lead Camus into academic discourses in philosophy as an artist with a distinct and important philosophy to offer." - Shaun Stevenson, in: Pli (2016), 191-194"This book has helped me understand the place in which I live and my place in it… Sharpe’s book demonstrates that Camus’ oeuvre is a move from an individual philosophy of individual mesure (the Myth of Sisyphus), where the absurd is more like a humility before nature than an undermining of rationality, to a philosophy of community which uses the permanence of nature to limit the ability of hegemony, history et al to impose barbaric political reality on its citizens. Mesure is what allows us to come closer to the concepts which stand outside of the historicst reductive readings of mankind." - Dr Daniel Brennan, Bond University"This is a great book, showing a love of wordplay and words, and providing a generous reading of Camus’ work. We can look back and see a distorted moralism in the accusations of Camus’ moralism by Sartre, Jeanson, and so on. Matthew makes a very compelling case for taking Camus’ philosophy seriously, for thinking of Camus as a person of sense and wisdom, as well as a great, lyrical writer. The book is beautifully written and delightful to read. The philosophy of mesure and the virtues of faithfulness, wonder, love, and intelligence, are all in the book and the author." - Associate Professor Marguerite La Caze, University of Queensland"Matthew Sharpe conducts an impressive, in-depth study of Camus’ work, presenting him in a tantalizing new light: as a direct heir of the Enlightenment who sought to defend its project in systematic ways, between philosophy and literature." - Jean-Philippe Deranty, Macquarie University"According to Sharpe, Camus’ work—literary fiction, plays, mediations, extended philosophy essays, political journalism—belongs to the Enlightenment’s basic vision of the philosopher as an engaged thinker, whose model was not Plato, but Cicero. Camus’ moderate scepticism means that his work sought to defend the ancient value of Sophrosyne (avoidance of excesses) on new, modern and post-metaphysical foundations, while Sharpe reads his works as communicative acts in public contexts, where the mode of communication was shaped rhetorically to the audience and the situation ...This represented a reactivation of the idea of philosophy as a way of life—as a thoughtful life exemplified by reflective conduct, rather than as an extension of medieval scholasticism into a scientific age in the form philosophical system-building." - Geoffrey Boucher, author of Adorno Reframed (2013)"While the case Matt Sharpe makes here for reconsidering Camus as a philosophe is original, illuminating, and compelling, far more important is his defense and implicit practice of a Socratic and Ciceronian conception of philosophical commitment that makes that reconsideration possible. As a result, Sharpe's Camus is not only a modern rebel but also truly classic, and at a moment when many are giving a sympathetic ear to Pierre Hadot, Sharpe's Camus has offered us an inspiring exemplum of a far more engaged conception of what it really means to live the life of philosophy." --W.H.F. Altman, author of Plato the Teacher: The Crisis of the Republic (2014) and The Guardians in Actions: Plato the Teacher and the Post-Republic Dialogues from Timaeus to Theaetetus (2016)
