Michał Rynkowski, Ph.D. (2003), Habilitation (2014) is a former Assistant Professor at the Chair of International and European Law, University of Wrocław. As from 2006 he works as an official of the European Commission. He has published several articles in the field of the EU law and ecclesiastical law.

• Religious Courts in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human RightsMichał RynkowskiAbstractKeywords1 Introduction2 Religious Courts: Their Structures and Their Legal Standing3 Important Decisions and Judgments of the European Court (and the European Commission) of Human Rights, Not Referring Directly to Religious Courts4 Relations between Religious Courts and State Courts in Strasbourg Case-Law5 Conclusions and OutlookBibliography

Michał Rynkowski, Ph.D. (2003), Habilitation (2014) is a former Assistant Professor at the Chair of International and European Law, University of Wrocław. As from 2006 he works as an official of the European Commission. He has published several articles in the field of the EU law and ecclesiastical law.

• Religious Courts in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human RightsMichał RynkowskiAbstractKeywords1 Introduction2 Religious Courts: Their Structures and Their Legal Standing3 Important Decisions and Judgments of the European Court (and the European Commission) of Human Rights, Not Referring Directly to Religious Courts4 Relations between Religious Courts and State Courts in Strasbourg Case-Law5 Conclusions and OutlookBibliography

Michał Rynkowski, Ph.D. (2003), Habilitation (2014) is a former Assistant Professor at the Chair of International and European Law, University of Wrocław. As from 2006 he works as an official of the European Commission. He has published several articles in the field of the EU law and ecclesiastical law.

• Religious Courts in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human RightsMichał RynkowskiAbstractKeywords1 Introduction2 Religious Courts: Their Structures and Their Legal Standing3 Important Decisions and Judgments of the European Court (and the European Commission) of Human Rights, Not Referring Directly to Religious Courts4 Relations between Religious Courts and State Courts in Strasbourg Case-Law5 Conclusions and OutlookBibliography