Anna Moszynska – författare

Polen stand nach dem Großen Krieg vor der Herausforderung der innerstaatlichen Rechtsvereinheitlichung über die Grenzen der europäischen Rechtskreise hinaus und der Integration in das System internationaler Rechtsnormen. Die Zweite Polnische Republik bot deshalb den Anblick eines Laboratoriums en miniature für internationale gesetzgeberische Arbeit, in welchem die Idee, eines neuen, modernen polnischen Rechts mit der lex lata fremder Rechtsordnungen verglichen werden konnte. Die Arbeit der polnischen Kodifikationskommission erfolgte in einem europäischen Umfeld, das vom Streben nach Rechtsvereinheitlichung gekennzeichnet war, und ist deshalb als Pionierunternehmen für eine europäische Rechtsvereinheitlichung über die Grenzen der in Kontinentaleuropa bestehenden Rechtskreise hinaus anzusehen.

The study of the Polish tax system and policy which enriches knowledge of developments in one of the largest and most rapidly changing states in Europe. It is the result of cooperation of academics and practitioners from major tax advisory firms as well as in-house tax experts.Political changes in Poland (electoral victory of the right-wing PiS party) coincided with changes on the global tax scene, which were associated with the BEPS project (Base Erosion and Profit Shifting), implemented by the OECD. The struggle to rebuild countries’ tax revenues began. The ambitious social policy in Poland, which involved substantial transfers of funds to the less well-off, required an increase in budget revenues. Thus, the Polish government quickly became an ardent supporter of BEPS. The radicalism of the tax policy changes raised many doubts among practitioners, who accused the authorities of excessive fiscalism. On the other hand, the legal rules previously in force did indeed poorly protect the fiscal interests of the state.The study of the Polish tax system and Polish tax policy based on the contributions collected in this volume enriches knowledge of developments in one of the largest and most rapidly changing states in Europe.

The study of the Polish tax system and policy which enriches knowledge of developments in one of the largest and most rapidly changing states in Europe. It is the result of cooperation of academics and practitioners from major tax advisory firms as well as in-house tax experts.Political changes in Poland (electoral victory of the right-wing PiS party) coincided with changes on the global tax scene, which were associated with the BEPS project (Base Erosion and Profit Shifting), implemented by the OECD. The struggle to rebuild countries'' tax revenues began. The ambitious social policy in Poland, which involved substantial transfers of funds to the less well-off, required an increase in budget revenues. Thus, the Polish government quickly became an ardent supporter of BEPS. The radicalism of the tax policy changes raised many doubts among practitioners, who accused the authorities of excessive fiscalism. On the other hand, the legal rules previously in force did indeed poorly protect the fiscal interests of the state.The study of the Polish tax system and Polish tax policy based on the contributions collected in this volume enriches knowledge of developments in one of the largest and most rapidly changing states in Europe.

In 2022 the Polish Constitution celebrated the silver anniversary of its enactment. It has generally correctly served as the basis for the functioning of the state, proving itself even in the most difficult moments of its existence. Since 2015 the Polish Constitution has been subject to major factual changes to such an extent that it is reasonable to argue that it and Polish constitutionalism in general have come to function in rather unusual, if not downright extreme conditions. This monograph entitled "Poland in good constitution? Contemporary issues of constitutional law in Poland in the European context" aims to present analyses of selected aspects of the impact of the Polish Constitution on individual branches of law and problems occurring in them. All issues are placed in a wide, European context.

The limited liability company (GmbH) was created by the German legislature in 1892 as a company form without any historical forerunners or suggestions from comparative law. It brought about a readjustment of the relationship between the chance of profit and the liability risk. However, criticism from the jurisprudence that had not been included in the quick legislative process was also heard from the start. As early as 1892, Levin Goldschmidt expressed concern that the GmbH would replace ‘principally more solid forms of company’. However, this criticism did not prevent the company form of the GmbH from being adopted in numerous European countries, or at least seriously considering its reception.