Eugenio Bulygin – författare

Eugenio Bulygin is a distinguished representative of legal science and legal philosophy as they are known on the European continent - no accident, given the role of the civil law tradition in his home country, Argentina. Over the past half-century, Bulygin has engaged virtually all major legal philosophers in the English-speaking countries, including H.L.A. Hart, Ronald Dworkin, and Joseph Raz. Bulygin''s essays, several written together with his eminent colleagueand close friend Carlos E. Alchourrón, reflect the genre familiar from Alf Ross''s On Law and Justice, Hans Kelsen''s Pure Theory of Law, and Georg Henrik von Wright''s Norm and Action. Bulygin''s wide-ranging interests include most of the topics found under the rubric of analytical jurisprudence -interpretation and judicial reasoning, validity and efficacy of law, legal positivism and the problem of normativity, completeness and consistency of the legal system, the nature of legal norms, and the role of deontic logic in the law. The reader will take delight in the often agreeably unorthodox character of Bulygin''s views and in his hard-hitting arguments in defence of them. He challenges the received opinion on gaps in the law, on legal efficacy, on permissory norms, and on the criteriafor legal validity. Bulygin''s essays have been wellnigh inaccessible in the past, appearing in specialized journals, often in Spanish or German. They are now available for the first time in an English-language collection.

Eugenio Bulygin is a distinguished representative of legal science and legal philosophy as they are known on the European continent - no accident, given the role of the civil law tradition in his home country, Argentina. Over the past half-century, Bulygin has engaged virtually all major legal philosophers in the English-speaking countries, including H.L.A. Hart, Ronald Dworkin, and Joseph Raz. Bulygin''s essays, several written together with his eminent colleagueand close friend Carlos E. Alchourrón, reflect the genre familiar from Alf Ross''s On Law and Justice, Hans Kelsen''s Pure Theory of Law, and Georg Henrik von Wright''s Norm and Action. Bulygin''s wide-ranging interests include most of the topics found under the rubric of analytical jurisprudence -interpretation and judicial reasoning, validity and efficacy of law, legal positivism and the problem of normativity, completeness and consistency of the legal system, the nature of legal norms, and the role of deontic logic in the law. The reader will take delight in the often agreeably unorthodox character of Bulygin''s views and in his hard-hitting arguments in defence of them. He challenges the received opinion on gaps in the law, on legal efficacy, on permissory norms, and on the criteriafor legal validity. Bulygin''s essays have been wellnigh inaccessible in the past, appearing in specialized journals, often in Spanish or German. They are now available for the first time in an English-language collection.

Eugenio Bulygin is a distinguished representative of legal science and legal philosophy as they are known on the European continent - no accident, given the role of the civil law tradition in his home country, Argentina. Over the past half-century, Bulygin has engaged virtually all major legal philosophers in the English-speaking countries, including H.L.A. Hart, Ronald Dworkin, and Joseph Raz. Bulygin's essays, several written together with his eminent colleague and close friend Carlos E. Alchourrón, reflect the genre familiar from Alf Ross's On Law and Justice, Hans Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law, and Georg Henrik von Wright's Norm and Action. Bulygin's wide-ranging interests include most of the topics found under the rubric of analytical jurisprudence - interpretation and judicial reasoning, validity and efficacy of law, legal positivism and the problem of normativity, completeness and consistency of the legal system, the nature of legal norms, and the role of deontic logic in the law. The reader will take delight in the often agreeably unorthodox character of Bulygin's views and in his hard-hitting arguments in defence of them. He challenges the received opinion on gaps in the law, on legal efficacy, on permissory norms, and on the criteria for legal validity. Bulygin's essays have been wellnigh inaccessible in the past, appearing in specialized journals, often in Spanish or German. They are now available for the first time in an English-language collection.

En los diversos artículos recopilados en este libro, Eugenio Bulygin muestra que una clara distinción entre normas y proposiciones normativas es esencial no solo para comprender el discurso normativo sino también para elaborar una justificación adecuada a uno de los desafíos centrales de la lógica deóntica: la posibilidad de una genuina lógica de normas. Además, Bulygin ofrece su visión del modo en que Carlos E. Alchourrón y Georg Henrik von Wright lucharon para clarificar la naturaleza de la lógica deóntica. Este testimonio no se agota en las cuestiones conceptuales que estructuran este libro, sino que también muestra aspectos esenciales de la personalidad de cada uno de esos grandes filósofos. En los dos últimos ensayos de este volumen se recogen textos de Alchourrón y von Wright en los que ellos exponen directamente su visión del tema central de este libro: la relevancia de la distinción entre normas y proposiciones normativas.

En el trabajo principal de este libro- Josep Raz se ocupa de estas cuestiones, y su postura es rebatida en dos ensayos de Robert Alexy y Eugenio Bulygin, que tienen visiones diferentes sobre el particular. El libro resultará de interés, no sólo para filósofos del derecho, sino también para aquellos que estén preocupados, en el ámbito de la filosofía en general por la relación entre el análisis filosófico y el análisis conceptual. El libro contiene además un estudio preliminar que, a través de un repaso de las distintas perspectivas sobre la relación entre análisis filosófico y análisis conceptual, busca poner al alcance del lector las herramientas teóricas necesarias para abordar la discusión.

Las permisiones y las normas permisivas ocupan un lugar destacado en la teoría del derecho, la lógica deóntica y la filosofía moral. Esta obra, El libro de los permisos, pone de manifiesto la rica variedad de problemas que se entrecruzan en su análisis: la distinción entre normas y proposiciones normativas, la naturaleza dinámica y jerárquica del derecho, la plenitud de los sistemas jurídicos, la discrecionalidad judicial, etcétera.Este volumen reúne textos de profesores de universidades latinoamericanas y españolas que revisan diferentes aspectos de esa agenda conceptual. Su hilo conductor es el desarrollo del enfoque clásico de Alchourrón y Bulygin. Los ejes críticos más relevantes enfatizan la necesidad de revisar ese modelo a la luz de teorías que tomen en cuenta, a diferentes niveles en la identificación del derecho, el papel de las prácticas interpretativas en la determinación del valor de verdad de las proposiciones normativas y la relevancia de los principios jurídicos y morales en la justificación de decisiones judiciales. De este modo, este libro puede entenderse como una polémica acerca del enfoque positivista, una oposición entre diferentes concepciones del derecho y un esfuerzo por comprender mejor los sistemas normativos y el razonamiento jurídico.