This volume deals with the occurrence and development of unreliable first-person narration in twentieth century Western literature. The different articles in this collection approach this topic both from the angle of literary theory and through a detailed reading of literary texts. By addressing questions concerning the functions, characteristics and types of unreliability, this collection contributes to the current theoretical debate about unreliable narration. At the same time, the collection highlights the different uses to which unreliability has been put in different contexts, poetical traditions and literary movements. It does so by tracing the unreliable first-person narrator in a variety of texts from Dutch, German, American, British, French, Italian, Polish, Danish and Argentinean literature. In this way, this volume significantly extends the traditional ‘canon’ of narrative unreliability. This collection combines essays from some of the foremost theoreticians of unreliability (James Phelan, Ansgar Nünning) with essays from experts in different national traditions. The result is a collection that approaches the ‘case’ of narrative unreliability from a new and more varied perspective.

This volume deals with the occurrence and development of unreliable first-person narration in twentieth century Western literature. The different articles in this collection approach this topic both from the angle of literary theory and through a detailed reading of literary texts. By addressing questions concerning the functions, characteristics and types of unreliability, this collection contributes to the current theoretical debate about unreliable narration. At the same time, the collection highlights the different uses to which unreliability has been put in different contexts, poetical traditions and literary movements. It does so by tracing the unreliable first-person narrator in a variety of texts from Dutch, German, American, British, French, Italian, Polish, Danish and Argentinean literature. In this way, this volume significantly extends the traditional ‘canon’ of narrative unreliability. This collection combines essays from some of the foremost theoreticians of unreliability (James Phelan, Ansgar Nünning) with essays from experts in different national traditions. The result is a collection that approaches the ‘case’ of narrative unreliability from a new and more varied perspective.

Among other titles, Alexander Kluge has been described over the course of the past few decades by colleagues, critics and academics as an encyclopedist, a "chronicler of the century", "narrator of critical theory", or the "only large-scale project developer we have today" (Habermas). Such titles are merely endeavours to find a term to cover the whole interdisciplinary gamut of his works (running from literary, to film, theoretical and televisual work), which over more than five decades have developed a rhizomatic structure that is difficult to keep track of, even for authorities on Kluge.The Alexander Kluge Yearbook attempts to remedy this situation. Through the publication of new texts, it reflectsthe continued development of the history of his oeuvre, bringing together the results of international Kluge research, presenting documents from earlier periods and thus offering insight into the way he works. Each volume will contain, finally, an updated bibliography (of primary and research literature) and videography (of DCTP productions).

Adorno characterized Critical Theory as a message in a bottle in 1940 when the exiled Frankfurt School''s sphere of influence was an ocean away from the catastrophes of fascism it sought to fight. Turning Adorno''s metaphor on its head some six decades later, Kluge likens his creative method in the interview with Oskar Negt that opens the second volume of the Kluge-Jahrbuch to echoes of light refracted through a bottle: "I can also see something by looking through shards of glass," he explains. Deploying this turn of phrase as its point of departure, this issue of the Jahrbuch devotes its attention first to Kluge''s theory work written with Negt, its roots in and adaptation of the Frankfurt School tradition as well as its indebtedness to other schools of thought. In the remainder of the volume, scholars working in five different disciplines across the humanities query Kluge''s ways of seeing in film, television and literature.

Marx spricht im »Kapital« von den »animal spirits«, den »Lebensgeistern«. Sie erwachen, wenn Menschen räumlich zusammen sind. So ist schon ein Publikum keinesfalls die bloße Summe von Einzelnen. Das Wichtigste geschieht zwischen den Menschen, denn: »Keiner ist alleine schlau genug.« »Kooperation« gibt es aber auch in ihnen: »Ich denke, weil ich davon absehen kann, daß ich bin. Ich bin nämlich keineswegs allein, sondern in mir sind die anderen, und die denken unaufhörlich, weil das ihre Notwehrform ist.« In Alexander Kluges Begriffsinventar und in seiner praktischen Arbeit ist »Kooperation« eines der wichtigsten Stichwörter. Das Jahrbuch 2017 konzentriert sich darauf. Marx speaks in "Das Kapital" of the "animal spirits", the "spirits of life". They awaken when people are together spatially. Thus, an audience is by no means a mere sum of individuals. The most important things happen between people, because: "No one person who stands alone is smart enough". "Cooperation" is also within them: "I think I am, because I can ignore it. I am actually by no means alone; others are within me, and they think incessantly, because that is their form of self-defence." In Alexander Kluge''s conceptual inventory as well as in his practical work, "cooperation" is one of the most important key words to be noted. This will be the focal point of the 2017 Yearbook.

Der Wunsch nur ein paar Wochen oder Monate in die Zukunft blicken zu können, ist in Europa seit dem 24. Februar 2022 vermutlich enorm gewachsen. Sie war nach 1945 nie so ungewiss wie jetzt. Die Deformation der klassischen Öffentlichkeit ist massiv. Die Erinnerungen an Krieg sind so blass, dass die Kunst, sich seinem Sog zu entziehen, als Feigheit, Unmoral, Schwäche erscheint. Auf diesen gesamten Zusammenhang der schockartigen Anwesenheit des Krieges bei einer Politik, die nach alter Gewohnheit vorgibt, alles im Griff zu haben, anstatt sich auf die Gefahr der wirklichen Situation zu besinnen, ist mit dem Suchbegriff oder der Suchmetapher »Maulwurf Krieg« gezielt.The desire to look only a few weeks or months into the future has probably grown enormously in Europe since February 24, 2022. The situation has never been as uncertain after 1945 as it is now. The deformation of the classical public sphere is massive. Memories of war are so pale that the art of evading its pull appears as cowardice, immorality, weakness. The search term or metaphor "mole war" is aimed at this entire context of the shocking presence of war in a politics that, according to old habit, pretends to have everything under control instead of reflecting on the danger of the real situation.

In welchem Sinne bestimmt und bedingt es die Lektüre, wenn man Robert Musil als Philosoph, als Natur- oder Kulturwissenschaftler, vielleicht sogar als Linguist, oder doch vorrangig als Schriftsteller auffasst? Der vorliegende Band setzt es sich zum Ziel, anhand von «anderen» und in ihrer Ausrichtung voneinander abweichenden Lektüren die zahlreichen und höchst unterschiedlichen Methodologien, die sich zurzeit mit Musils Werk beschäftigen (Rhetorik, Narratologie, Ideen- und Geistesgeschichte, Medien- und Kulturwissenschaft, Editionskritik, Philosophie, etc.) miteinander zu konfrontieren. Angesichts der inhärenten Interdisziplinarität und Interdiskursivität des Œuvres kann Musil als exemplarischer Testfall für eine in ihrem Objektbereich und in ihrer (methodologischen) Orientierung einmal mehr verunsicherte Literaturwissenschaft betrachtet werden. Die einzelnen Beiträge zu diesem Band bieten editionsphilologische Überlegungen, Mikroanalysen von Figürlichkeitsformen und Erzählverfahren, Überlegungen zur Rezeption und zur Denkbarkeit von möglichen philosophischen und literarischen Bezügen und können als interdisziplinäre Antwort auf die Frage nach dem Verhältnis von Literatur zu anderen Diskursen verstanden werden.

This volume deals with the occurrence and development of unreliable first-person narration in twentieth century Western literature. The different articles in this collection approach this topic both from the angle of literary theory and through a detailed reading of literary texts. By addressing questions concerning the functions, characteristics and types of unreliability, this collection contributes to the current theoretical debate about unreliable narration. At the same time, the collection highlights the different uses to which unreliability has been put in different contexts, poetical traditions and literary movements. It does so by tracing the unreliable first-person narrator in a variety of texts from Dutch, German, American, British, French, Italian, Polish, Danish and Argentinean literature. In this way, this volume significantly extends the traditional ‘canon’ of narrative unreliability. This collection combines essays from some of the foremost theoreticians of unreliability (James Phelan, Ansgar Nünning) with essays from experts in different national traditions. The result is a collection that approaches the ‘case’ of narrative unreliability from a new and more varied perspective.

This volume deals with the occurrence and development of unreliable first-person narration in twentieth century Western literature. The different articles in this collection approach this topic both from the angle of literary theory and through a detailed reading of literary texts. By addressing questions concerning the functions, characteristics and types of unreliability, this collection contributes to the current theoretical debate about unreliable narration. At the same time, the collection highlights the different uses to which unreliability has been put in different contexts, poetical traditions and literary movements. It does so by tracing the unreliable first-person narrator in a variety of texts from Dutch, German, American, British, French, Italian, Polish, Danish and Argentinean literature. In this way, this volume significantly extends the traditional ‘canon’ of narrative unreliability. This collection combines essays from some of the foremost theoreticians of unreliability (James Phelan, Ansgar Nünning) with essays from experts in different national traditions. The result is a collection that approaches the ‘case’ of narrative unreliability from a new and more varied perspective.

Among other titles, Alexander Kluge has been described over the course of the past few decades by colleagues, critics and academics as an encyclopedist, a "chronicler of the century", "narrator of critical theory", or the "only large-scale project developer we have today" (Habermas). Such titles are merely endeavours to find a term to cover the whole interdisciplinary gamut of his works (running from literary, to film, theoretical and televisual work), which over more than five decades have developed a rhizomatic structure that is difficult to keep track of, even for authorities on Kluge.The Alexander Kluge Yearbook attempts to remedy this situation. Through the publication of new texts, it reflectsthe continued development of the history of his oeuvre, bringing together the results of international Kluge research, presenting documents from earlier periods and thus offering insight into the way he works. Each volume will contain, finally, an updated bibliography (of primary and research literature) and videography (of DCTP productions).

Adorno characterized Critical Theory as a message in a bottle in 1940 when the exiled Frankfurt School''s sphere of influence was an ocean away from the catastrophes of fascism it sought to fight. Turning Adorno''s metaphor on its head some six decades later, Kluge likens his creative method in the interview with Oskar Negt that opens the second volume of the Kluge-Jahrbuch to echoes of light refracted through a bottle: "I can also see something by looking through shards of glass," he explains. Deploying this turn of phrase as its point of departure, this issue of the Jahrbuch devotes its attention first to Kluge''s theory work written with Negt, its roots in and adaptation of the Frankfurt School tradition as well as its indebtedness to other schools of thought. In the remainder of the volume, scholars working in five different disciplines across the humanities query Kluge''s ways of seeing in film, television and literature.

Marx spricht im »Kapital« von den »animal spirits«, den »Lebensgeistern«. Sie erwachen, wenn Menschen räumlich zusammen sind. So ist schon ein Publikum keinesfalls die bloße Summe von Einzelnen. Das Wichtigste geschieht zwischen den Menschen, denn: »Keiner ist alleine schlau genug.« »Kooperation« gibt es aber auch in ihnen: »Ich denke, weil ich davon absehen kann, daß ich bin. Ich bin nämlich keineswegs allein, sondern in mir sind die anderen, und die denken unaufhörlich, weil das ihre Notwehrform ist.« In Alexander Kluges Begriffsinventar und in seiner praktischen Arbeit ist »Kooperation« eines der wichtigsten Stichwörter. Das Jahrbuch 2017 konzentriert sich darauf. Marx speaks in "Das Kapital" of the "animal spirits", the "spirits of life". They awaken when people are together spatially. Thus, an audience is by no means a mere sum of individuals. The most important things happen between people, because: "No one person who stands alone is smart enough". "Cooperation" is also within them: "I think I am, because I can ignore it. I am actually by no means alone; others are within me, and they think incessantly, because that is their form of self-defence." In Alexander Kluge''s conceptual inventory as well as in his practical work, "cooperation" is one of the most important key words to be noted. This will be the focal point of the 2017 Yearbook.

Der Wunsch nur ein paar Wochen oder Monate in die Zukunft blicken zu können, ist in Europa seit dem 24. Februar 2022 vermutlich enorm gewachsen. Sie war nach 1945 nie so ungewiss wie jetzt. Die Deformation der klassischen Öffentlichkeit ist massiv. Die Erinnerungen an Krieg sind so blass, dass die Kunst, sich seinem Sog zu entziehen, als Feigheit, Unmoral, Schwäche erscheint. Auf diesen gesamten Zusammenhang der schockartigen Anwesenheit des Krieges bei einer Politik, die nach alter Gewohnheit vorgibt, alles im Griff zu haben, anstatt sich auf die Gefahr der wirklichen Situation zu besinnen, ist mit dem Suchbegriff oder der Suchmetapher »Maulwurf Krieg« gezielt.The desire to look only a few weeks or months into the future has probably grown enormously in Europe since February 24, 2022. The situation has never been as uncertain after 1945 as it is now. The deformation of the classical public sphere is massive. Memories of war are so pale that the art of evading its pull appears as cowardice, immorality, weakness. The search term or metaphor "mole war" is aimed at this entire context of the shocking presence of war in a politics that, according to old habit, pretends to have everything under control instead of reflecting on the danger of the real situation.

In welchem Sinne bestimmt und bedingt es die Lektüre, wenn man Robert Musil als Philosoph, als Natur- oder Kulturwissenschaftler, vielleicht sogar als Linguist, oder doch vorrangig als Schriftsteller auffasst? Der vorliegende Band setzt es sich zum Ziel, anhand von «anderen» und in ihrer Ausrichtung voneinander abweichenden Lektüren die zahlreichen und höchst unterschiedlichen Methodologien, die sich zurzeit mit Musils Werk beschäftigen (Rhetorik, Narratologie, Ideen- und Geistesgeschichte, Medien- und Kulturwissenschaft, Editionskritik, Philosophie, etc.) miteinander zu konfrontieren. Angesichts der inhärenten Interdisziplinarität und Interdiskursivität des Œuvres kann Musil als exemplarischer Testfall für eine in ihrem Objektbereich und in ihrer (methodologischen) Orientierung einmal mehr verunsicherte Literaturwissenschaft betrachtet werden. Die einzelnen Beiträge zu diesem Band bieten editionsphilologische Überlegungen, Mikroanalysen von Figürlichkeitsformen und Erzählverfahren, Überlegungen zur Rezeption und zur Denkbarkeit von möglichen philosophischen und literarischen Bezügen und können als interdisziplinäre Antwort auf die Frage nach dem Verhältnis von Literatur zu anderen Diskursen verstanden werden.