Mikael Alm – författare

The interplay between clothes and social order in early modern societies is well known. Differences in dress and hierarchies of appearances coincided with and structured social hierarchies and notions of difference. However, clothes did not merely reproduce set social patterns. They were agents of change, actively used by individuals and groups to make claims and transgress formal boundaries. This was not least the case for the revolutionary decades of the late eighteenth century, the period in focus of this book. Unlike previous studies on sumptuary laws and other legal actions taken by governments and formal power holders, this book offers a broader and more everyday perspective on late eighteenth-century sartorial discourse. In 1773, there was a publicly announced prize competition on the advantages and disadvantages of a national dress in Sweden. Departing from the submitted replies, the study opens a window onto the sartorial world. Several fields of cultural history are brought together: social culture in terms of order, hierarchies, and notions of difference; sartorial culture with contemporary views on dress and moral aspects of sartorial practices; and visual culture in terms of sartorial means of making a difference and the emphasis on the necessity of a legible social order.

The interplay between clothes and social order in early modern societies is well known. Differences in dress and hierarchies of appearances coincided with and structured social hierarchies and notions of difference. However, clothes did not merely reproduce set social patterns. They were agents of change, actively used by individuals and groups to make claims and transgress formal boundaries. This was not least the case for the revolutionary decades of the late eighteenth century, the period in focus of this book. Unlike previous studies on sumptuary laws and other legal actions taken by governments and formal power holders, this book offers a broader and more everyday perspective on late eighteenth-century sartorial discourse. In 1773, there was a publicly announced prize competition on the advantages and disadvantages of a national dress in Sweden. Departing from the submitted replies, the study opens a window onto the sartorial world. Several fields of cultural history are brought together: social culture in terms of order, hierarchies, and notions of difference; sartorial culture with contemporary views on dress and moral aspects of sartorial practices; and visual culture in terms of sartorial means of making a difference and the emphasis on the necessity of a legible social order.

Slaget vid Narva är en av den svenska krigsmaktens mest berömda segrar. Slaget stod utanför staden Narvas murar den 20 november år 1700 mellan svenska och ryska arméer och resulterade i att den ryska belägringen av staden hävdes och den svenska armén kunde räkna sig som segrare. Det var en seger som innehöll alla ingredienser för att en triumferande berättelse skulle spridas över Europa, om en ung och oerfaren kung, en numerärt överlägsen motståndare och en seger mot alla odds.

I Minnet av Narva belyser författarna skildringen om den makalösa segern och hur den berättats och förvaltats i historieskrivningen. Det svenska krigsbytet var stort flera hundra ryska fanor och kanoner hade erövrats och skickades till Sverige. I Stockholm firades segern storslaget med segerparad och fest, och i kyrkorna proklamerades Karl XII:s storslagna triumf.

Här får vi perspektiv på det kulturarv som krigsbytet från Narva utgör, hur berättelsen om slaget har förändrats över tid och fått olika betydelser inte minst genom de sätt slaget kommit att användas i krigspropaganda.