393 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
393 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
393 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
872 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
2 654 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
1 109 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
1 109 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
553 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
220 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
492 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
1 995 kr
Kommande
533 kr
Kommande
185 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
674 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
144 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
220 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
773 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
226 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
312 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
296 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
261 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
623 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
321 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
424 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
The Missouri legislature passes a bill to flout federal gun-control laws it deems unconstitutional. Texas refuses to recognize same-sex marriages, citing the state’s sovereignty. The Tenth Amendment Center promotes the “Federal Health Care Nullification Act.” In these and many other similar instances, the spirit of nullification is seeing a resurgence in an ever-more politically fragmented and decentralized America. What this means—in legal, cultural, and historical terms—is the question explored in Nullification and Secession in Modern Constitutional Thought. Bringing together a number of distinguished scholars, the book offers a variety of informed perspectives on what editor Sanford Levinson terms “neo-nullification,” a category that extends from formal declarations on the invalidity of federal law to what might be called “uncooperative federalism.”
Mark Tushnet, Mark Graber, James Read, Jared Goldstein, Vicki Jackson, and Alison La Croix are among the contributors who consider a strain of federalism stretching from the framing of the Constitution to the state of Texas’s most recent threat to secede from the United States. The authors look at the theory and practice of nullification and secession here and abroad, discussing how contemporary advocates use the text and history of the Constitution to make their cases, and how very different texts and histories influence such movements outside of the United States—in Scotland, for instance, or Catalonia, or Quebec, or even England vis-à-vis the European Union. Together these essays provide a nuanced account of the practical and philosophical implications of a concept that has marked America’s troubled times, from the build-up to the Civil War to the struggle over civil rights to battles over the Second Amendment and Obamacare.
377 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
608 kr
Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar
1 380 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
336 kr
Skickas inom 5-8 vardagar
561 kr
Skickas inom 3-6 vardagar
586 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
Although most discussions of diversity have focused on race and ethnicity, Levinson is particularly interested in religious diversity and its implications. Why, he asks, do arguments for racial and ethnic diversity not also counsel a concern to achieve religious diversity within a student body? He considers the propriety of judges drawing on their religious views in making legal decisions and the kinds of questions Senators should feel free to ask nominees to the federal judiciary who have proclaimed the importance of their religion in structuring their own lives. In exploring the sense in which Sandy Koufax can be said to be a “Jewish baseball player,” he engages in broad reflections on professional identity. He asks whether it is desirable, or even possible, to subordinate merely "personal" aspects of one’s identity—religion, political viewpoints, gender—to the impersonal demands of the professional role. Wrestling with Diversity is a powerful interrogation of the assumptions and contradictions underlying public life in a multicultural world.
835 kr
Läs direkt efter köp
An increasing number of constitutional theorists, within both the legal academy and university departments of government, are focusing on the conceptual and political problems attached to the notion of constitutional amendment. Amendments are, among other things, recognitions of the imperfection of existing schemes of government. The relative ease or difficulty of amendment has significant implications for the ways that governments respond to problems that call either for new structures of governance or new powers for already established structures. This book brings together essays by leading legal authorities and political scientists on a range of questions from whether the U.S. Constitution is subject to amendment by procedures other than those authorized by Article V to how significant change is conceptualized within classical rabbinic Judaism. Though the essays are concerned for the most part with the American experience, other constitutional traditions are considered as well. The contributors include Bruce Ackerman, Akhil Reed Amar, Mark E. Brandon, David R. Dow, Stephen M. Griffin, Stephen Holmes and Cass R. Sunstein, Sanford Levinson, Donald Lutz, Walter Murphy, Frederick Schauer, John R. Vile, and Noam J. Zohar.