Bokus
Robert J. Howell - Consciousness and the Limits of Objectivity, Inbunden

Inbunden, Engelska, 2013

Consciousness and the Limits of Objectivity

The Case for Subjective Physicalism

Av Robert J. Howell

1087 kr

Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar. Fri frakt över 249 kr.

Beskrivning
In Consciousness and the Limits of Objectivity Robert J. Howell argues that the options in the debates about consciousness and the mind-body problem are more limited than many philosophers have appreciated. Unless one takes a hard-line stance, which either denies the data provided by consciousness or makes a leap of faith about future discoveries, one must admit that no objective picture of our world can be complete. Howell argues, however, that this is consistent with physicalism, contrary to received wisdom. After developing a novel, neo-Cartesian notion of the physical, followed by a careful consideration of the three major anti-materialist arguments--Black's 'Presentation Problem', Jackson's Knowledge Argument, and Chalmers' Conceivability Argument--Howell proposes a 'subjective physicalism' which gives the data of consciousness their due, while retaining the advantages of a monistic, physical ontology.
Produktinformation
  • Utgivningsdatum: 2013-06-13
  • Mått: 147 x 223 x 19 mm
  • Vikt: 390 g
  • Format: Inbunden
  • Språk: Engelska
  • Antal sidor: 202
  • Förlag: OUP OXFORD
  • ISBN: 9780199654666
Utforska kategorier
Mer om författaren

Robert J. Howell received his Ph.D. In philosophy from Brown University in 2002. He is an Associate Professor at Southern Methodist University, and has published numerous articles on the mind-body problem, self-knowledge, and issues in epistemology. He is the co-author, with Torin Alter, of A Dialogue on Consciousness (OUP, 2009) and The God Dialogues (OUP 2011), and has co-edited with Alter Consciousness and the Mind Body Problem: A Reader (OUP, 2011).

Recensioner i media

... let me end by emphasizing how clear, imaginative and straightforward this book is. Subjective physicalism has been defended before, but Howell makes a good case that existing versions are incomplete.

Betyg & recensioner

0 recensioner

Inga recensioner tillgängliga.