Jessika Eichler is Research Fellow in the Law & Anthropology Department at the Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology and trAndeS programme, Institute for Latin American Studies, FU Berlin.

• Table of Figures Acknowledgements Chapter I: Introduction Chapter II: Setting up a Reconciliatory Framework: Reflections on Individual, Group-Based and Indigenous Collective Rights Encounters 2.1 Third Wayers and Terminologies: Bridging the Individual versus Collective Rights Divide or Third Categories as Distractions? 2.2 Dichotomies, Incommensurability or Constructed Demarcations? 2.3 Pre-conditionalism and its Impacts on Reconciling the Frameworks 2.4 Dual Standing and other Technicalities 2.5 Towards a Third Perspective within the Framework(s) 2.5.1 Absolute Individual Rights Claims in the Indigenous Collective Framework 2.5.2 Individual Entitlements in Absolute Indigenous Collective Regimes 2.5.3 Non-Derogation Claims in Non-Derogation Frameworks: Absoluteness in Individual and Collective Indigenous Claims 2.6 Conclusions: Third Perspective, Absoluteness and ‘Shared Spheres’ Chapter III: Indigenous Peoples’ Individual and Collective Rights to Participation in International Human Rights Law 3.1 Participatory Rights and their Codification in Indigenous Rights Regimes 3.1.1 The "Participation Model" of the Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples 3.1.2 Indigenous Peoples’ Participatory Rights Regime as Shaped by the Special Rapporteur 3.1.3 The Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues and its Influence on Indigenous Rights Jurisprudence 3.2 Indigenous Participation in the Inter-American Human Rights System 3.2.1 The IACtHR and its Evolutionary Interpretation of Indigenous Participatory Rights 3.2.2 The IACHR and its View on Participation 3.3 Conflicting Intersectionalities? Individual Members’ Participatory Rights in Decision-Making 3.3.1 Third Perspective A

Jessika Eichler is Research Fellow in the Law & Anthropology Department at the Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology and trAndeS programme, Institute for Latin American Studies, FU Berlin.

• Table of Figures Acknowledgements Chapter I: Introduction Chapter II: Setting up a Reconciliatory Framework: Reflections on Individual, Group-Based and Indigenous Collective Rights Encounters 2.1 Third Wayers and Terminologies: Bridging the Individual versus Collective Rights Divide or Third Categories as Distractions? 2.2 Dichotomies, Incommensurability or Constructed Demarcations? 2.3 Pre-conditionalism and its Impacts on Reconciling the Frameworks 2.4 Dual Standing and other Technicalities 2.5 Towards a Third Perspective within the Framework(s) 2.5.1 Absolute Individual Rights Claims in the Indigenous Collective Framework 2.5.2 Individual Entitlements in Absolute Indigenous Collective Regimes 2.5.3 Non-Derogation Claims in Non-Derogation Frameworks: Absoluteness in Individual and Collective Indigenous Claims 2.6 Conclusions: Third Perspective, Absoluteness and ‘Shared Spheres’ Chapter III: Indigenous Peoples’ Individual and Collective Rights to Participation in International Human Rights Law 3.1 Participatory Rights and their Codification in Indigenous Rights Regimes 3.1.1 The "Participation Model" of the Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples 3.1.2 Indigenous Peoples’ Participatory Rights Regime as Shaped by the Special Rapporteur 3.1.3 The Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues and its Influence on Indigenous Rights Jurisprudence 3.2 Indigenous Participation in the Inter-American Human Rights System 3.2.1 The IACtHR and its Evolutionary Interpretation of Indigenous Participatory Rights 3.2.2 The IACHR and its View on Participation 3.3 Conflicting Intersectionalities? Individual Members’ Participatory Rights in Decision-Making 3.3.1 Third Perspective A