Revd Dr Graham Hamborg is a Continuing Ministerial Development Officer in the Anglican Diocese of Chelmsford, UK.

• PrefaceWorks Referred to by Author's Name OnlyAbbreviationsIntroduction1. A Redaction-critical Study: Methodology and Terminology2. The Redactional Compositions Underlying the Amos-text3. The Coherence of the Redactional Compositions Underlying the Amos-text4. The Relationship of Amos 2.8 to Exodus 22.5-26 (26-27) and Deuteronomy 24.10-185. The Presence of Election Traditions in Amos 2.9-126. Semantic Change in the Terms 'Needy,' 'Poor' and 'Afflicted'7. Interpretations of the Reasons for Judgment in Amos 2.6-16 in the Redactional Compositions Underlying the Amos-text8. Summary and ConclusionsBibliography Index of ReferencesIndex of Authors

Revd Dr Graham Hamborg is a Continuing Ministerial Development Officer in the Anglican Diocese of Chelmsford, UK.

• PrefaceWorks Referred to by Author's Name OnlyAbbreviationsIntroduction1. A Redaction-critical Study: Methodology and Terminology2. The Redactional Compositions Underlying the Amos-text3. The Coherence of the Redactional Compositions Underlying the Amos-text4. The Relationship of Amos 2.8 to Exodus 22.5-26 (26-27) and Deuteronomy 24.10-185. The Presence of Election Traditions in Amos 2.9-126. Semantic Change in the Terms 'Needy,' 'Poor' and 'Afflicted'7. Interpretations of the Reasons for Judgment in Amos 2.6-16 in the Redactional Compositions Underlying the Amos-text8. Summary and ConclusionsBibliography Index of ReferencesIndex of Authors

Revd Dr Graham Hamborg is a Continuing Ministerial Development Officer in the Anglican Diocese of Chelmsford, UK.

• PrefaceWorks Referred to by Author's Name OnlyAbbreviationsIntroduction1. A Redaction-critical Study: Methodology and Terminology2. The Redactional Compositions Underlying the Amos-text3. The Coherence of the Redactional Compositions Underlying the Amos-text4. The Relationship of Amos 2.8 to Exodus 22.5-26 (26-27) and Deuteronomy 24.10-185. The Presence of Election Traditions in Amos 2.9-126. Semantic Change in the Terms 'Needy,' 'Poor' and 'Afflicted'7. Interpretations of the Reasons for Judgment in Amos 2.6-16 in the Redactional Compositions Underlying the Amos-text8. Summary and ConclusionsBibliography Index of ReferencesIndex of Authors