Revd Dr Graham Hamborg is a Continuing Ministerial Development Officer in the Anglican Diocese of Chelmsford. This study is a revision of his doctoral thesis, for which he was awarded a PhD by the University of Nottingham in 2009.

• Preface; Acknowledgements; Abbreviations; Notes on Presentation; Introduction; Chapter 1: A Redaction-critical Study: Methodology and Terminology; Chapter 2: The Redactional Compositions Underlying the Amos-text; Chapter 3: The Coherence of the Redactional Compositions; Underlying the Amos-text; Chapter 4: The Relationship of Amos 2.8 to Exodus 22.5-26 (26-27) and; Deuteronomy 24.10-18; Chapter 5: The Presence of Election Traditions in Amos 2.9-12; Chapter 6: Semantic Change in the Terms; Chapter 7: Interpretations of the Reasons for Judgment in Amos 2.6-16 in the Redactional Compositions Underlying the Amos-text; Chapter 8: Summary and Conclusions; Bibliography.

Revd Dr Graham Hamborg is a Continuing Ministerial Development Officer in the Anglican Diocese of Chelmsford. This study is a revision of his doctoral thesis, for which he was awarded a PhD by the University of Nottingham in 2009.

• Preface; Acknowledgements; Abbreviations; Notes on Presentation; Introduction; Chapter 1: A Redaction-critical Study: Methodology and Terminology; Chapter 2: The Redactional Compositions Underlying the Amos-text; Chapter 3: The Coherence of the Redactional Compositions; Underlying the Amos-text; Chapter 4: The Relationship of Amos 2.8 to Exodus 22.5-26 (26-27) and; Deuteronomy 24.10-18; Chapter 5: The Presence of Election Traditions in Amos 2.9-12; Chapter 6: Semantic Change in the Terms; Chapter 7: Interpretations of the Reasons for Judgment in Amos 2.6-16 in the Redactional Compositions Underlying the Amos-text; Chapter 8: Summary and Conclusions; Bibliography.

Revd Dr Graham Hamborg is a Continuing Ministerial Development Officer in the Anglican Diocese of Chelmsford. This study is a revision of his doctoral thesis, for which he was awarded a PhD by the University of Nottingham in 2009.

• Preface; Acknowledgements; Abbreviations; Notes on Presentation; Introduction; Chapter 1: A Redaction-critical Study: Methodology and Terminology; Chapter 2: The Redactional Compositions Underlying the Amos-text; Chapter 3: The Coherence of the Redactional Compositions; Underlying the Amos-text; Chapter 4: The Relationship of Amos 2.8 to Exodus 22.5-26 (26-27) and; Deuteronomy 24.10-18; Chapter 5: The Presence of Election Traditions in Amos 2.9-12; Chapter 6: Semantic Change in the Terms; Chapter 7: Interpretations of the Reasons for Judgment in Amos 2.6-16 in the Redactional Compositions Underlying the Amos-text; Chapter 8: Summary and Conclusions; Bibliography.