Jane Moriarty is Visiting Associate Professor at the University of Akron School of Law, Akron Ohio. She is author of Psychological and Scientific Evidence inCriminal Trials (Clark Boardman Callaghan, 1996), which is updated annually, and editor of Women and the Law (West Group, 1998). She has written a number of articles dealing with law, evidence, and expert witnesses.

• Dusky v. United States , 362 U.S. 402 (1960). Pate v. Robinson , 383 U.S. 375 (1966). Drope v. Missouri , 420 U.S. 162 (1975). Ford v. Wainwright , 477 U.S. 399 (1986). Penry v. Lynaugh , 492 U.S. 302 (1989). Washington v. Harper , 494 U.S. 210 (1990). Riggins v. Nevada , 504 U.S. 127 (1992). Louisiana v. Perry , 610 So.2d 746 (1992). Foucha v. Louisiana , 504 U.S. 71 (1992). Cooper v. Oklahoma , 517 U.S. 348 (1996). Arrigo, Bruce A. and Christopher R. Williams. Law, Ideology, and Critical Inquiry: The Case of Treatment Refusal for Incompetent Prisoners Awaiting Execution, New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement 25 (1999).

Jane Moriarty is Visiting Associate Professor at the University of Akron School of Law, Akron Ohio. She is author of Psychological and Scientific Evidence inCriminal Trials (Clark Boardman Callaghan, 1996), which is updated annually, and editor of Women and the Law (West Group, 1998). She has written a number of articles dealing with law, evidence, and expert witnesses.

• Dusky v. United States , 362 U.S. 402 (1960). Pate v. Robinson , 383 U.S. 375 (1966). Drope v. Missouri , 420 U.S. 162 (1975). Ford v. Wainwright , 477 U.S. 399 (1986). Penry v. Lynaugh , 492 U.S. 302 (1989). Washington v. Harper , 494 U.S. 210 (1990). Riggins v. Nevada , 504 U.S. 127 (1992). Louisiana v. Perry , 610 So.2d 746 (1992). Foucha v. Louisiana , 504 U.S. 71 (1992). Cooper v. Oklahoma , 517 U.S. 348 (1996). Arrigo, Bruce A. and Christopher R. Williams. Law, Ideology, and Critical Inquiry: The Case of Treatment Refusal for Incompetent Prisoners Awaiting Execution, New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement 25 (1999).

Jane Moriarty is Visiting Associate Professor at the University of Akron School of Law, Akron Ohio. She is author of Psychological and Scientific Evidence inCriminal Trials (Clark Boardman Callaghan, 1996), which is updated annually, and editor of Women and the Law (West Group, 1998). She has written a number of articles dealing with law, evidence, and expert witnesses.

• Dusky v. United States , 362 U.S. 402 (1960). Pate v. Robinson , 383 U.S. 375 (1966). Drope v. Missouri , 420 U.S. 162 (1975). Ford v. Wainwright , 477 U.S. 399 (1986). Penry v. Lynaugh , 492 U.S. 302 (1989). Washington v. Harper , 494 U.S. 210 (1990). Riggins v. Nevada , 504 U.S. 127 (1992). Louisiana v. Perry , 610 So.2d 746 (1992). Foucha v. Louisiana , 504 U.S. 71 (1992). Cooper v. Oklahoma , 517 U.S. 348 (1996). Arrigo, Bruce A. and Christopher R. Williams. Law, Ideology, and Critical Inquiry: The Case of Treatment Refusal for Incompetent Prisoners Awaiting Execution, New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement 25 (1999).