Transitional Justice and the Criminal Responsibility of Judges

Claudia Cárdenas is Associate Professor in the Department of Criminal Sciences at the Faculty of Law of the Universidad de Chile.Jaime Couso is Professor in the Department of Criminal Law and Dean of the Faculty of Law at Universidad Diego Portales (Chile).Florian Jeßberger is Professor at Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin (Germany), where he holds the Chair in Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, International Criminal Law, and Modern Legal History.Milan Kuhli is Professor and Vice Dean for Academic Affairs of the Faculty of Law at Universität Hamburg (Germany), where he holds the Chair in Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure, including its International and Historical Context.

• Introduction Section A: Case Studies: Germany, Argentina, Chile 1. Settling Accounts for Nazi-era Judicial Injustice (NS-Justizunrecht) Before Allied and (West-) German Courts: Charting New Territories and Failed Opportunities 2. Malfeasance in Office as a Crime in the Context of Dictatorships: The Example of Judicial Perversion of Justice in the East German Waldheim Trials 3. Prosecuting State Criminality After German Unification – Judging the Judges 4. Dictatorship and Judicial Complicity: The Case of Argentina 5. Judicial Murder in Chile: Patterns, Cases, and Doctrines for Prosecuting Jurists 6. Self-Representations of the Chilean Judiciary Regarding their Responsibility in Relation to the Crimes of the Dictatorship Section B. Judicial Immunity and the Invalidation of Judicial Decisions 7. Judicial Immunity and its Limits: The Anglo-American Approach 8. Judicial Immunity: A South American Approach 9. Invalidation of Judicial Decisions in Cases of Farcical Prosecutions: A German Perspective 10. Invalidation of ‘Judicial’ Decisions in Cases of Sham or Show Trials: An International Criminal Law Perspective 11. Fraudulent Res Judicata and Impunity: A Chilean Perspective Section C | Intent, Mistake of Law and Other Issues of Imputation 12. Judicial Abuse and Mistake of Law: A Normative Approach Based on a Comparative Law Perspective 13. Defending the Indefensible: The Mistake of Law Defence Applied to the Case of Judges in Dictatorships and Rogue Regimes - A Comparative Approach 14. Judicial Murder, Torture, and Unlawful Detention: An Overview from the Italian Legal System 15. On the Relationship Between Judicial Perversion of Justice and Judges' Participation in Crimes Against Humanity Section D | Modes of Responsibility and Criminal Association 16. Superior Responsibility and Judicial Murder: When Judges Are Not “Superior” 17. Jurists’ Responsibility for Crimes of Dictatorships – An International Criminal Law Perspective 18. Judges’ Responsibility for Participation in a Criminal Association: A Comparative and Theoretical Analysis 19. Judges as Criminal Associates of Totalitarian Regimes: The Chilean Case Under the Framework of International Law. 20. A Judge’s Participation in a Criminal or Terrorist Organisation: From Nuremberg to Contemporary German Criminal Law Closing Remarks