David Schneiderman is a professor in the Faculty of Law at the University of Toronto.

“Red, White and Kind of Blue? is crisp and unnerving. It suggests Parliament is so malleable, and many of its participants so weak, it dispensed with ancient checks and balances without a shot being fired.”- Holly Doan (Blacklocks Reporter, October 10, 2015) “By providing a provocative discussion of contemporary issues and analysis of constitutional reform, Red, White and Kind of Blue is a worthy read. As for its core argument, the book should succeed in spurring a useful debate about Canada’s constitutional culture as well.” - Emmett MacFarlane, The Literary Review of Canada, March 2016 ‘Highly recommended.’- G. A. McBeath (Choice Magazine vol 53:11:2016)

• IntroductionChapter One. “No Servile Copy”: Constitutional Differences That MatterChapter Two. President or Prime Minister? Prorogation 2008Chapter Three. The King’s Prerogative vs. Parliamentary Privilege: Prorogation 2009Chapter Four. A “More Salutary Check”? Electing the Canadian SenateChapter Five. Appointing Justices: Supreme Court Nominees and the PressConclusion

David Schneiderman is a professor in the Faculty of Law at the University of Toronto.

“Red, White and Kind of Blue? is crisp and unnerving. It suggests Parliament is so malleable, and many of its participants so weak, it dispensed with ancient checks and balances without a shot being fired.”- Holly Doan (Blacklocks Reporter, October 10, 2015) “By providing a provocative discussion of contemporary issues and analysis of constitutional reform, Red, White and Kind of Blue is a worthy read. As for its core argument, the book should succeed in spurring a useful debate about Canada’s constitutional culture as well.” - Emmett MacFarlane, The Literary Review of Canada, March 2016 ‘Highly recommended.’- G. A. McBeath (Choice Magazine vol 53:11:2016)

• IntroductionChapter One. “No Servile Copy”: Constitutional Differences That MatterChapter Two. President or Prime Minister? Prorogation 2008Chapter Three. The King’s Prerogative vs. Parliamentary Privilege: Prorogation 2009Chapter Four. A “More Salutary Check”? Electing the Canadian SenateChapter Five. Appointing Justices: Supreme Court Nominees and the PressConclusion

David Schneiderman is a professor in the Faculty of Law at the University of Toronto.

“Red, White and Kind of Blue? is crisp and unnerving. It suggests Parliament is so malleable, and many of its participants so weak, it dispensed with ancient checks and balances without a shot being fired.”- Holly Doan (Blacklocks Reporter, October 10, 2015) “By providing a provocative discussion of contemporary issues and analysis of constitutional reform, Red, White and Kind of Blue is a worthy read. As for its core argument, the book should succeed in spurring a useful debate about Canada’s constitutional culture as well.” - Emmett MacFarlane, The Literary Review of Canada, March 2016 ‘Highly recommended.’- G. A. McBeath (Choice Magazine vol 53:11:2016)

• IntroductionChapter One. “No Servile Copy”: Constitutional Differences That MatterChapter Two. President or Prime Minister? Prorogation 2008Chapter Three. The King’s Prerogative vs. Parliamentary Privilege: Prorogation 2009Chapter Four. A “More Salutary Check”? Electing the Canadian SenateChapter Five. Appointing Justices: Supreme Court Nominees and the PressConclusion