Reading Bergson’s philosophical texts is a challenge. Lacking clarity and uniformity in his discourse and deliberately avoiding definitions, Bergson nevertheless aims to persuade the reader to think about reality in a different way than he or she has done before. The French philosopher asks us to stop relying on concepts because they channel our thoughts and make us disregard reality per se, which is richer than the aggregation of notions. Accordingly, a Bergson reader learns that the analytical approach falsifies the object of inquiry because analysis allegedly dismantles and misrepresents its essentially dynamic nature. The only way one can access subject matter adequately is via intuition, according to Bergson. That said, the knowledge acquired in an intuitive grasp is incommunicable, because communicating a thought requires breaking it down into verbalized segments thus jeopardizing its unity and integrity. However, if philosophers want to overcome the limitations of a human approach to reasoning and understand what unperceived reality is, they must integrate the intuitive grasp into the philosophical discourse—somehow. Over a century passed since Bergson set this intellectual challenge, and commentators, critics, and followers have produced a substantial body of research clarifying, cataloging, attacking, and developing Bergson’s theory. Scholars’ interest in Bergson has had its highs and lows, but if the twenty-first century philosophy readers and commentators turn to Bergsonism with a renewed enthusiasm, I would not be surprised to find that Adam Lovasz’s Updating Bergson played a significant part in this.Unlike other scholars who engage with Bergson by working through his texts chronologically, Lovasz negotiates them in reverse order. Accordingly, beginning with Bergson’s later writings, he leaves Time and Free Will, the philosopher’s initial discussion of time and being, till the end. This original and simple move achieves a great deal. Bergson’s theory is not consistent throughout his books because his ideas developed over time and his arguments became modified accordingly. Therefore, until now, Bergson readers shared his intellectual journey following the same path of tentative discovery, rewarding and full of exciting revelations, but at times fatiguing and frustrating due to puzzling inconsistencies. By examining Bergson’s last book, The Creative Mind,in the first chapter, Lovasz offers the summary of Bergson’s philosophy saving new Bergson readers from having to make the same journey as their predecessors. With Bergson’s important ideas condensed and synopsized in this way, the readers will find following Bergson easier, as they will get a much clearer vision of the entire project, prefaced by its outcome. In his writing, Lovasz achieves the high level of control over Bergson’s entire pool of texts, effortlessly navigating between ideas that cut across various themes, successfully disengaging from Bergson’s vocabulary and thus avoiding the trap of the circularity of argumentation.Successfully resisting the gravitational pull of Bergson’s original conceptual framework but remaining faithful to the core idea of Bergson’s project allowed Lovasz to make a serious attempt at resolving Bergson’s epistemological contradiction. Whilst Bergson seems to have been unable to reconcile intuitive insight and communication (since the communication requires concepts, which are unable to convey intuitions), as Lovasz engages with the ideas of duration, image, and matter he deploys terse and punchy metaphors that immediately become more than metaphors but a methodological device effectively conveying Bergson-inspired vision of reality that lies beyond our habitual cognition. Undoubtedly, as the readers become acquainted with Lovasz’s clear and tightly argued discourse, they will be convinced that by ‘excavat[ing] … the radical potential of Bergsonism’ it may be eventually possible to ‘break[…] out of the cage of restricted, anthropomorphic thought’ and engage with ‘nonlinear dynamics of ontological consistency’—the effort that will be rewarded by acquiring the mental vision of ‘raw brute being,’ using Lovasz’s words. After all, this is the challenge that Bergson sets his reader and which Lovasz urges us to accept.
