Alberto G. Urquidez is currently a CFD Postdoctoral Fellow in Philosophy at Bowdoin College, USA. .

“Urquidez carefully works through a massive body of literature and thought, and offers a compelling critique of the overlapping discursive spheres that will appeal to critics on various levels.” (George N. Fourlas, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol. 24, 2021)“(Re-) Defining Racism is a very smart and well-written book that I think Alberto Urquidez should be extremely proud to have written. The book covers an impressive amount of literature, both in philosophy of language … and philosophy of race.” (José Jorge Mendoza, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol. 24, 2021)“Alberto G. Urquidez’s (Re-) Defining Racism, is a masterful work in conceptual explication … . Urquidez has contributed a great deal to the academic philosophical tradition of Philosophy of Race and others will doubtless take up extensive discussion ofmany aspects of this seminal work.” (Naomi Zack, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol. 24, 2021)

• Ch.1. Introduction: Summary of the Argument.- Ch.2. Introduction: Toward a Conventionalist Framework.- Ch. 3. Re-defining “Definition”: An Argument for Conventionalism.- Ch. 4. Re-defining “Meaning”: Defending Semantic Internalism Over Externalism.- Ch. 5. Re-defining “Disagreement”: Rationality Without Final Solutions.- Ch. 6. Re-defining “Philosophical Analysis”: Not Descriptive Analysis, Or Conservatism, But Pragmatic Revisionism.- Ch. 7. Adequacy Conditions for a Prescriptive Theory of Racism: Toward an Oppression-Centered Account.- Ch. 8. Racial Oppression and Grammatical Pluralism: A Critique of Jorge Garcia on Racist belief.- Ch. 9. Concluding Note.

Alberto G. Urquidez is currently a CFD Postdoctoral Fellow in Philosophy at Bowdoin College, USA. .

“Urquidez carefully works through a massive body of literature and thought, and offers a compelling critique of the overlapping discursive spheres that will appeal to critics on various levels.” (George N. Fourlas, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol. 24, 2021)“(Re-) Defining Racism is a very smart and well-written book that I think Alberto Urquidez should be extremely proud to have written. The book covers an impressive amount of literature, both in philosophy of language … and philosophy of race.” (José Jorge Mendoza, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol. 24, 2021)“Alberto G. Urquidez’s (Re-) Defining Racism, is a masterful work in conceptual explication … . Urquidez has contributed a great deal to the academic philosophical tradition of Philosophy of Race and others will doubtless take up extensive discussion ofmany aspects of this seminal work.” (Naomi Zack, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol. 24, 2021)

• Ch.1. Introduction: Summary of the Argument.- Ch.2. Introduction: Toward a Conventionalist Framework.- Ch. 3. Re-defining “Definition”: An Argument for Conventionalism.- Ch. 4. Re-defining “Meaning”: Defending Semantic Internalism Over Externalism.- Ch. 5. Re-defining “Disagreement”: Rationality Without Final Solutions.- Ch. 6. Re-defining “Philosophical Analysis”: Not Descriptive Analysis, Or Conservatism, But Pragmatic Revisionism.- Ch. 7. Adequacy Conditions for a Prescriptive Theory of Racism: Toward an Oppression-Centered Account.- Ch. 8. Racial Oppression and Grammatical Pluralism: A Critique of Jorge Garcia on Racist belief.- Ch. 9. Concluding Note.

Alberto G. Urquidez is currently a CFD Postdoctoral Fellow in Philosophy at Bowdoin College, USA. .

“Urquidez carefully works through a massive body of literature and thought, and offers a compelling critique of the overlapping discursive spheres that will appeal to critics on various levels.” (George N. Fourlas, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol. 24, 2021)“(Re-) Defining Racism is a very smart and well-written book that I think Alberto Urquidez should be extremely proud to have written. The book covers an impressive amount of literature, both in philosophy of language … and philosophy of race.” (José Jorge Mendoza, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol. 24, 2021)“Alberto G. Urquidez’s (Re-) Defining Racism, is a masterful work in conceptual explication … . Urquidez has contributed a great deal to the academic philosophical tradition of Philosophy of Race and others will doubtless take up extensive discussion ofmany aspects of this seminal work.” (Naomi Zack, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol. 24, 2021)

• Ch.1. Introduction: Summary of the Argument.- Ch.2. Introduction: Toward a Conventionalist Framework.- Ch. 3. Re-defining “Definition”: An Argument for Conventionalism.- Ch. 4. Re-defining “Meaning”: Defending Semantic Internalism Over Externalism.- Ch. 5. Re-defining “Disagreement”: Rationality Without Final Solutions.- Ch. 6. Re-defining “Philosophical Analysis”: Not Descriptive Analysis, Or Conservatism, But Pragmatic Revisionism.- Ch. 7. Adequacy Conditions for a Prescriptive Theory of Racism: Toward an Oppression-Centered Account.- Ch. 8. Racial Oppression and Grammatical Pluralism: A Critique of Jorge Garcia on Racist belief.- Ch. 9. Concluding Note.