Merleau-Ponty: An Ontology of the Imaginary

Annabelle Dufourcq is Professor of Philosophical Anthropology at Radboud University. She has published on the relation between the real and the imaginary in contemporary continental philosophy, with special interest in phenomenology. She is the author of  'La dimension imaginaire du réel dans la philosophie de Husserl' (Springer 2010) and 'The Imaginary of Animals' (Routledge 2021).Bryan Smyth is Instructional Assistant Professor at the University of Mississippi. His research deals primarily with phenomenology and critical social theory. He is the author of Merleau-Ponty’s Existential Phenomenology and the Realization of Philosophy (Bloomsbury, 2013), and he translated Merleau-Ponty’s The Sensible World and the World of Expression (Northwestern University Press, 2020).

• Introduction.- Section I The Husserlian legacy and the initial motivations of Merleau Ponty’s thought: crisis of rationality, oneiric world, and risk of madness.- Introduction: crisis and imaginary.- The modern crisis.- Husserl’s greatest discovery according to Merleau Ponty: the Heraclitean flow, between reason and unreason.- The problem of authenticity in Merleau Ponty: humanity and world dissolved by the imaginary?.- Section II Imagination, nothingness, and inauthenticity in Sartre.- Introduction.- Consciousness is nothingness.- Image, imagination, and imaginary in Sartre.- Existence and the world: a froth of nothingness at the surface of Being.- The theatrics of existence.- The overcoming of the dualism of Being and Nothingness is prefigured in Sartrean philosophy.- Section III The Merleau Pontian definition of the imaginary as a particular register of phenomena alongside the real .- Introduction: thematization of the imaginary and definition of a broadened reality.- Merleau Ponty’s invocations of the Sartrean definition of the imaginary are inseparable from his critique of the opposition between Being and Nothingness.- Merleau Ponty’s critique of the Sartrean conception of the imaginary.- The genuine and even enhanced presence of the real in the imaginary.- The proximity between the Merleau Pontian redefinition of the imaginary and Bachelard’s philosophy.- Section IV The conquest of authenticity.- Introduction: “authenticity” and poetic depth.- Imaginary love: a necessary and fruitful failure General definition of the imaginary as institution.- Institutions and creative acts of taking up in an “authentic” deep and poetic existence.- Authenticity, imaginary, and reality.- Section V The imaginary is the true Stiftung of Being.- The imaginary as introduction to ontology and then as fundamental ontological model.- An ungraspable Urstiftung: Being as dehiscence.- Depth loves masks: Being as a play of images.- Conclusion.