Tom Holert – författare

Resonating at the heart of Neolithic Childhood. Art in a False Present, c. 1930 is the question whether art has present, past, and future functions. The modernist assertion of the autonomy of art was intended to render superfluous art’s social and religious functions. But what if the functionlessness of art comes under suspicion of being instrumentalized by bourgeois capitalism? This was an accusation that informed the anti-modernist critique of the avant-garde, and particularly of Surrealism. The objective throughout the crisis-ridden present of the 1920s to the 1940s was to reaffirm a once ubiquitous, but long-lost functionality—not only of art.The publication accompanying the exhibition examines the strategies deployed in this reaffirmation. These include the surrealist Primitivism of an “Ethnology of the White Man” together with the excavation of the deep time of humanity—into the “Neolithic Childhood” mapped out by the notoriously anti-modernist Carl Einstein (1885-1940) as a hallucinatory retro-utopia. The volume brings together essays by the curators and academics involved in the project, primary texts by Carl Einstein and a comprehensive documentation of the exhibition including lists of works, texts on as well as images of numerous exhibits and finally installation views. At the center of the volume, a glossary discusses Carl Einstein’s own theoretical vocabulary as well as further associated terms, such as Autonomy, Formalism, Function, Gesture, Hallucination, Art, Metamorphosis, Primitivisms, Totality.With contributions by: Irene Albers, Philipp Albers, Joyce S. Cheng, Rosa Eidelpes, Carl Einstein, Anselm Franke, Charles W. Haxthausen, Tom Holert, Sven Lütticken, Ulrike Müller, Jenny Nachtigall, David Quigley, Cornelius Reiber, Erhard Schüttpelz, Kerstin Stakemeier, Maria Stavrinaki, Elena Vogman, Zairong Xiang, Sebastian ZeidlerWith reproductions of artworks by:Jean (Hans) Arp, Willi Baumeister, Georges Braque, Brassaï, Claude Cahun, Lux T. Feininger, Max Ernst, Florence Henri, Barbara Hepworth, Hannah Höch, Heinrich Hoerle, Paul Klee, Germaine Krull, Helen Levitt, André Masson, Alexandra Povòrina, Gaston-Louis Roux, Kalifala Sidibé, Louis Soutter, Yves Tanguy, Toyen, Jindřich Štyrský, Raoul Ubac, Paule Vézelay and others.

The omnipresence of AI currently raises questions not only about the promise of truthfulness made by technical media, but also about their legal regulation. Generative models such as Midjourney, Stable Diffusion 3.5, Flux, and Lavida-O generate new visual worlds that make it urgent to redefine legal norms. In legal history, technical images like photography and film have always been actants in the negotiation of copyright, intellectual property rights, or the right to one's own image. When judges wear VR glasses and thus virtualize the courtroom, forensic image evidence is analyzed digitally, or future scenarios in climate lawsuits are imagined with the help of attribution models, operational images help constitute legal infrastructures. The new volume of Bildwelten des Wissens examines, at the intersection of Bildwissenschaft, media theory, and jurisprudence, the legal forms in which technical images are embedded and, conversely, how new image forms in digital environments are putting pressure on legal norms. Connects current debates about copyright, authorship, and intellectual property with the media history of photography, film, and AI artInterdisciplinary and international perspectives from visual and media studies, legal theory, and comic illustrationWith the first publication of an excerpt from Cornelia Vismann's Schrift Verfassung nach dem Computer (2006/2007)

An examination of contemporary art's recent emphasis on “research” and “knowledge production,” and its claims to provide a novel access to “knowledge.”

Questioning the role and function of contemporary art in economic and political systems that increasingly manage data and affect, Knowledge Beside Itself delves into the peculiar emphasis placed in recent years, curatorially and institutionally, on such notions as “research” and “knowledge production.” Contemporary art is viewed here as a strategic bet on the social distinctions and value extractions made possible by claiming a different, novel access to “knowledge.” Contemporary art's various liaisons with the humanities and the social and natural sciences, as well as its practitioners' frequent embeddedness within transdisciplinary research environments and educational settings, have created a sense of epistemo-aesthetic departure, which concurs with the growing relevance of art as conduit or catalyst of knowledge.

Discussing the practice of artists such as Christine Borland, Bureau d'études, Tony Chakar, Lina Dokuzović, Fernando García-Dory, Natascha Sadr Haghighian, Adelita Husni-Bey, Jakob Jakobsen, Claire Pentecost, and Pilvi Takala, writer and curator Tom Holert submits the gambit of conceptualizing contemporary art as an agent of epistemic politics to a genealogical analysis of its political-economic underpinnings—in times of cognitive capitalism, machine learning, and a renewed urgency of epistemological disobedience.

Ett nummer vars kärna är skrivandets praktik, och som därmed också vidrör andra aspekter av livet, så som livserfarenheter, etik, ensamhet, föräldraskap och politik. Hela tiden utifrån romanskrivandets längtan efter komplexa verkligheter. Anna-Marie Ljunberg, Steve Sem-Sandberg och Sara Stridsberg i unikt samtal arrangerat för detta nummer. Birgitta Trotzig och Agneta Pleijel i ett samtal från 1982. Intervju med Leslie Kaplan. Läs också om massans blick, och synen på massan, med exempel från dagens Egypten och mellankrigets maktkamp runt fotografiet.

A richly illustrated study of Marc Chaimowicz's groundbreaking 1972 post-Pop installation-performance piece Celebration? Realife.