Jane Moriarty is Visiting Associate Professor at the University of Akron School of Law, Akron Ohio. She is author of Psychological and Scientific Evidence inCriminal Trials (Clark Boardman Callaghan, 1996), which is updated annually, and editor of Women and the Law (West Group, 1998). She has written a number of articles dealing with law, evidence, and expert witnesses.

• Vol. 1: The History of Mental Illness in Criminal Cases: the English Tradition 0-8153-4062-1: 350pp 'The Trial of Edward Arnold,' 16 State Trials 695 (1723) (English Reports). Robinson, Daniel N. Wild Beasts and Idle Humours: The Insanity Defense from Antiquity to the Present (Harvard University Press, 1996). 'Hadfield's Case,' 16 State Trials 1282 (1800) (English Reports). O'Reilly-Fleming, Thomas. 'From Beasts to Bedlam: Hadfield, the Regency Crisis, M'Naghten and the 'Mad' Business in Britain, 1788-1843,' Journal of Psychiatry & Law 20 (1992). 'Oxford's Case,' 4 State Trials (new series) 498 (1840) (English Reports). 'The Case of Daniel M'Naghten,' 4 State Trials (new series) 847 (1843) (reprinted in Sir Roger Ormrod, The McNaughton Case and Its Predecessors, Daniel McNaughton: His Trial and Aftermath, Donald J. West and Alexander Walk, Eds. (Gaskell Books, 1977). Moran, Richard. 'The House of Lords Debate,' in Knowing Right from Wrong: The Insanity Defense of Daniel McNaughtan (The Free Press, 1981). Sir Roger Ormrod, The McNaughton Case and Its Predecessors, Daniel McNaughton: His Trial and Aftermath, Donald J. West and Alexander Walk, Eds. (Gaskell Books, 1977). Vol. 2: The Insanity Defense: American Developments 0-8153-4063-X: 350 pp Davis v. United States, 160 U.S 469 (1895). Smith v, United States, 36 F.2d 548 (D.C. Cir. 1929). Leland v.Oregon, 343 U.S 790 (1952). Durham v. United States, 214 F.2d 862 (D.C. 1954). United States v. Brawner, 471 F.2d. 969 (D.C. 1972). 'American Psychiatric Association Statement on the Insanity Defense,' American Journal of Psychiatry 120 (1983). Perlin, Michael J. excerpt from The Jurisprudence of the Insanity Defense (Carolina Academic Press, 1994). 'The Insanity Defense Reform Act, 18,' United States Code 17 (2000). English, Jodie. 'The Light Between Twilight and Dusk: Federal Criminal Law and the Volitional Insanity Defense,' Hastings Law Journal 40 (1988). Nygaard, Richard Lowell. 'On Responsibility: Or, the Insanity of Mental Defenses and Punishment,' Villanova Law Review 41 (1996). Elliot, Carl. excerpt from The Rules of Insanity: Moral Responsibility and the Mentally Ill Offender (1996) Slobogin, Christopher. 'An End to Insanity: Recasting the Role of Mental Disability in Criminal Cases,' Virginia Law Review 86 (2000). Vol. 3: Competency to be Tried, Imprisoned and Executed 0-8153-4064-8: 350 pp Dusky V. United States, 362 U.S. 402 (1960). Pate v. Robinson, 383 U.S. 375 (1966). Drope v. Missouri, 420 U.S. 162 (1975). Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986). Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989). Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210 (1990). Riggins v. Nevada, 504 U.S. 127 (1992). Louisiana v. Perry, 610 S

Jane Moriarty is Visiting Associate Professor at the University of Akron School of Law, Akron Ohio. She is author of Psychological and Scientific Evidence inCriminal Trials (Clark Boardman Callaghan, 1996), which is updated annually, and editor of Women and the Law (West Group, 1998). She has written a number of articles dealing with law, evidence, and expert witnesses.

• Vol. 1: The History of Mental Illness in Criminal Cases: the English Tradition 0-8153-4062-1: 350pp 'The Trial of Edward Arnold,' 16 State Trials 695 (1723) (English Reports). Robinson, Daniel N. Wild Beasts and Idle Humours: The Insanity Defense from Antiquity to the Present (Harvard University Press, 1996). 'Hadfield's Case,' 16 State Trials 1282 (1800) (English Reports). O'Reilly-Fleming, Thomas. 'From Beasts to Bedlam: Hadfield, the Regency Crisis, M'Naghten and the 'Mad' Business in Britain, 1788-1843,' Journal of Psychiatry & Law 20 (1992). 'Oxford's Case,' 4 State Trials (new series) 498 (1840) (English Reports). 'The Case of Daniel M'Naghten,' 4 State Trials (new series) 847 (1843) (reprinted in Sir Roger Ormrod, The McNaughton Case and Its Predecessors, Daniel McNaughton: His Trial and Aftermath, Donald J. West and Alexander Walk, Eds. (Gaskell Books, 1977). Moran, Richard. 'The House of Lords Debate,' in Knowing Right from Wrong: The Insanity Defense of Daniel McNaughtan (The Free Press, 1981). Sir Roger Ormrod, The McNaughton Case and Its Predecessors, Daniel McNaughton: His Trial and Aftermath, Donald J. West and Alexander Walk, Eds. (Gaskell Books, 1977). Vol. 2: The Insanity Defense: American Developments 0-8153-4063-X: 350 pp Davis v. United States, 160 U.S 469 (1895). Smith v, United States, 36 F.2d 548 (D.C. Cir. 1929). Leland v.Oregon, 343 U.S 790 (1952). Durham v. United States, 214 F.2d 862 (D.C. 1954). United States v. Brawner, 471 F.2d. 969 (D.C. 1972). 'American Psychiatric Association Statement on the Insanity Defense,' American Journal of Psychiatry 120 (1983). Perlin, Michael J. excerpt from The Jurisprudence of the Insanity Defense (Carolina Academic Press, 1994). 'The Insanity Defense Reform Act, 18,' United States Code 17 (2000). English, Jodie. 'The Light Between Twilight and Dusk: Federal Criminal Law and the Volitional Insanity Defense,' Hastings Law Journal 40 (1988). Nygaard, Richard Lowell. 'On Responsibility: Or, the Insanity of Mental Defenses and Punishment,' Villanova Law Review 41 (1996). Elliot, Carl. excerpt from The Rules of Insanity: Moral Responsibility and the Mentally Ill Offender (1996) Slobogin, Christopher. 'An End to Insanity: Recasting the Role of Mental Disability in Criminal Cases,' Virginia Law Review 86 (2000). Vol. 3: Competency to be Tried, Imprisoned and Executed 0-8153-4064-8: 350 pp Dusky V. United States, 362 U.S. 402 (1960). Pate v. Robinson, 383 U.S. 375 (1966). Drope v. Missouri, 420 U.S. 162 (1975). Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986). Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989). Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210 (1990). Riggins v. Nevada, 504 U.S. 127 (1992). Louisiana v. Perry, 610 S

Jane Moriarty is Visiting Associate Professor at the University of Akron School of Law, Akron Ohio. She is author of Psychological and Scientific Evidence inCriminal Trials (Clark Boardman Callaghan, 1996), which is updated annually, and editor of Women and the Law (West Group, 1998). She has written a number of articles dealing with law, evidence, and expert witnesses.

• Vol. 1: The History of Mental Illness in Criminal Cases: the English Tradition 0-8153-4062-1: 350pp 'The Trial of Edward Arnold,' 16 State Trials 695 (1723) (English Reports). Robinson, Daniel N. Wild Beasts and Idle Humours: The Insanity Defense from Antiquity to the Present (Harvard University Press, 1996). 'Hadfield's Case,' 16 State Trials 1282 (1800) (English Reports). O'Reilly-Fleming, Thomas. 'From Beasts to Bedlam: Hadfield, the Regency Crisis, M'Naghten and the 'Mad' Business in Britain, 1788-1843,' Journal of Psychiatry & Law 20 (1992). 'Oxford's Case,' 4 State Trials (new series) 498 (1840) (English Reports). 'The Case of Daniel M'Naghten,' 4 State Trials (new series) 847 (1843) (reprinted in Sir Roger Ormrod, The McNaughton Case and Its Predecessors, Daniel McNaughton: His Trial and Aftermath, Donald J. West and Alexander Walk, Eds. (Gaskell Books, 1977). Moran, Richard. 'The House of Lords Debate,' in Knowing Right from Wrong: The Insanity Defense of Daniel McNaughtan (The Free Press, 1981). Sir Roger Ormrod, The McNaughton Case and Its Predecessors, Daniel McNaughton: His Trial and Aftermath, Donald J. West and Alexander Walk, Eds. (Gaskell Books, 1977). Vol. 2: The Insanity Defense: American Developments 0-8153-4063-X: 350 pp Davis v. United States, 160 U.S 469 (1895). Smith v, United States, 36 F.2d 548 (D.C. Cir. 1929). Leland v.Oregon, 343 U.S 790 (1952). Durham v. United States, 214 F.2d 862 (D.C. 1954). United States v. Brawner, 471 F.2d. 969 (D.C. 1972). 'American Psychiatric Association Statement on the Insanity Defense,' American Journal of Psychiatry 120 (1983). Perlin, Michael J. excerpt from The Jurisprudence of the Insanity Defense (Carolina Academic Press, 1994). 'The Insanity Defense Reform Act, 18,' United States Code 17 (2000). English, Jodie. 'The Light Between Twilight and Dusk: Federal Criminal Law and the Volitional Insanity Defense,' Hastings Law Journal 40 (1988). Nygaard, Richard Lowell. 'On Responsibility: Or, the Insanity of Mental Defenses and Punishment,' Villanova Law Review 41 (1996). Elliot, Carl. excerpt from The Rules of Insanity: Moral Responsibility and the Mentally Ill Offender (1996) Slobogin, Christopher. 'An End to Insanity: Recasting the Role of Mental Disability in Criminal Cases,' Virginia Law Review 86 (2000). Vol. 3: Competency to be Tried, Imprisoned and Executed 0-8153-4064-8: 350 pp Dusky V. United States, 362 U.S. 402 (1960). Pate v. Robinson, 383 U.S. 375 (1966). Drope v. Missouri, 420 U.S. 162 (1975). Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986). Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989). Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210 (1990). Riggins v. Nevada, 504 U.S. 127 (1992). Louisiana v. Perry, 610 S