Nambury S. Raju, James W. Pellegrino, Meryl W. Bertenthal, Karen J. Mitchell, and Lee R. Jones, Editors; Committee on the Evaluation of National and State Assessments of Educational Progress, National Research Council

Select Guide Rating

• 1 Front Matter; 2 1 Introduction; 3 2 Families of Items in the NAEP Mathematics Assessment; 4 3 Student Thinking and Related Assessment: Creating a Facet-Based Learning Environment; 5 4 An External Evaluation of the 1996 Grade 8 NAEP Science Framework; 6 5 Appraising the Dimensionality of the 1996 NAEP Science Assessment Data; 7 6 Subject-Matter Experts' Perceptions of the Relevance of the NAEP Long-Term Trend Items in Science and Mathematics; 8 7 Issues in Phasing Out Trend NAEP; 9 8 Issues in Combining State NAEP and Main NAEP; 10 9 Difficulties Associated with Secondary Analysis of NAEP Data; 11 10 Putting Surveys, Studies, and Datasets Together: Linking NCES Surveys to One Another and to Datasets from Other Sources; 12 11 Developing Classroom Process Data for the Improvement of Teaching

Nambury S. Raju, James W. Pellegrino, Meryl W. Bertenthal, Karen J. Mitchell, and Lee R. Jones, Editors; Committee on the Evaluation of National and State Assessments of Educational Progress, National Research Council

Select Guide Rating

• 1 Front Matter; 2 1 Introduction; 3 2 Families of Items in the NAEP Mathematics Assessment; 4 3 Student Thinking and Related Assessment: Creating a Facet-Based Learning Environment; 5 4 An External Evaluation of the 1996 Grade 8 NAEP Science Framework; 6 5 Appraising the Dimensionality of the 1996 NAEP Science Assessment Data; 7 6 Subject-Matter Experts' Perceptions of the Relevance of the NAEP Long-Term Trend Items in Science and Mathematics; 8 7 Issues in Phasing Out Trend NAEP; 9 8 Issues in Combining State NAEP and Main NAEP; 10 9 Difficulties Associated with Secondary Analysis of NAEP Data; 11 10 Putting Surveys, Studies, and Datasets Together: Linking NCES Surveys to One Another and to Datasets from Other Sources; 12 11 Developing Classroom Process Data for the Improvement of Teaching

Nambury S. Raju, James W. Pellegrino, Meryl W. Bertenthal, Karen J. Mitchell, and Lee R. Jones, Editors; Committee on the Evaluation of National and State Assessments of Educational Progress, National Research Council

Select Guide Rating

• 1 Front Matter; 2 1 Introduction; 3 2 Families of Items in the NAEP Mathematics Assessment; 4 3 Student Thinking and Related Assessment: Creating a Facet-Based Learning Environment; 5 4 An External Evaluation of the 1996 Grade 8 NAEP Science Framework; 6 5 Appraising the Dimensionality of the 1996 NAEP Science Assessment Data; 7 6 Subject-Matter Experts' Perceptions of the Relevance of the NAEP Long-Term Trend Items in Science and Mathematics; 8 7 Issues in Phasing Out Trend NAEP; 9 8 Issues in Combining State NAEP and Main NAEP; 10 9 Difficulties Associated with Secondary Analysis of NAEP Data; 11 10 Putting Surveys, Studies, and Datasets Together: Linking NCES Surveys to One Another and to Datasets from Other Sources; 12 11 Developing Classroom Process Data for the Improvement of Teaching