David L. Sloss is the John A. and Elizabeth H. Sutro Professor of Law at Santa Clara University.

'Professor Sloss's proposal for a new constitutional revolution is most intriguing in its suggestion that we can get the best of the worlds of constitutionalism and democracy by using expansive exercises of national power and international human rights law (override-able by subsequent national legislation) to protect individual rights from legislative and executive abuses.' Mark Tushnet, William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law Emeritus, Harvard Law School

• Foreword: Nine principles for judicial review; Introduction: The problem of democratic decay; 1. A political process theory for the twenty-first century; 2. Four revolutions in constitutional law; 3. Elections; 4. Election-related misinformation; 5. Individual rights under international law; 6. Weak review, strong rights; 7. Federalism; 8. A roadmap for revolutionary change; Appendix.

David L. Sloss is the John A. and Elizabeth H. Sutro Professor of Law at Santa Clara University.

'Professor Sloss's proposal for a new constitutional revolution is most intriguing in its suggestion that we can get the best of the worlds of constitutionalism and democracy by using expansive exercises of national power and international human rights law (override-able by subsequent national legislation) to protect individual rights from legislative and executive abuses.' Mark Tushnet, William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law Emeritus, Harvard Law School

• Foreword: Nine principles for judicial review; Introduction: The problem of democratic decay; 1. A political process theory for the twenty-first century; 2. Four revolutions in constitutional law; 3. Elections; 4. Election-related misinformation; 5. Individual rights under international law; 6. Weak review, strong rights; 7. Federalism; 8. A roadmap for revolutionary change; Appendix.

David L. Sloss is the John A. and Elizabeth H. Sutro Professor of Law at Santa Clara University.

'Professor Sloss's proposal for a new constitutional revolution is most intriguing in its suggestion that we can get the best of the worlds of constitutionalism and democracy by using expansive exercises of national power and international human rights law (override-able by subsequent national legislation) to protect individual rights from legislative and executive abuses.' Mark Tushnet, William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law Emeritus, Harvard Law School

• Foreword: Nine principles for judicial review; Introduction: The problem of democratic decay; 1. A political process theory for the twenty-first century; 2. Four revolutions in constitutional law; 3. Elections; 4. Election-related misinformation; 5. Individual rights under international law; 6. Weak review, strong rights; 7. Federalism; 8. A roadmap for revolutionary change; Appendix.