Environmental Risks and the Media explores the ways in which environmental risks, threats and hazards are represented, transformed and contested by the media. At a time when popular conceptions of the environment as a stable, natural world with which humanity interferes are being increasingly contested, the medias methods of encouraging audiences to think about environmental risks - from the BSE or ''mad cow'' crisis to global climate change - are becoming more and more controversial.
Examining large-scale disasters, as well as ''everyday'' hazards, the contributors consider the tensions between entertainment and information in media coverage of the environment. How do the media frame ''expert'', ''counter-expert'' and ''lay public'' definitions of environmental risk? What role do environmental pressure groups like Greenpeace or ''eco-warriors'' and ''green guerrillas'' play in shaping what gets covered and how? Does the media emphasis on spectacular events at the expense of issue-sensitive reporting exacerbate the public tendency to overestimate sudden and violent risks and underestimate chronic long-term ones?

Environmental Risks and the Media explores the ways in which environmental risks, threats and hazards are represented, transformed and contested by the media. At a time when popular conceptions of the environment as a stable, natural world with which humanity interferes are being increasingly contested, the medias methods of encouraging audiences to think about environmental risks - from the BSE or ''mad cow'' crisis to global climate change - are becoming more and more controversial.
Examining large-scale disasters, as well as ''everyday'' hazards, the contributors consider the tensions between entertainment and information in media coverage of the environment. How do the media frame ''expert'', ''counter-expert'' and ''lay public'' definitions of environmental risk? What role do environmental pressure groups like Greenpeace or ''eco-warriors'' and ''green guerrillas'' play in shaping what gets covered and how? Does the media emphasis on spectacular events at the expense of issue-sensitive reporting exacerbate the public tendency to overestimate sudden and violent risks and underestimate chronic long-term ones?