Inbunden, Engelska, 2017
Evaluating Media Bias
917 kr
Beställningsvara. Skickas inom 10-15 vardagar. Fri frakt över 249 kr.
Beskrivning
Produktinformation
- Utgivningsdatum: 2017-07-13
- Mått: 154 x 238 x 14 mm
- Vikt: 349 g
- Format: Inbunden
- Språk: Engelska
- Antal sidor: 158
- Förlag: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
- ISBN: 9781442265653
Utforska kategorier
Mer om författaren
Adam Schiffer is associate professor of political science at TCU. He studies American politics and teaches courses on political communication, public opinion, and research methods. He has published on topics such as the role of social media in the 2012 presidential election, the ability of blogs to set the mainstream press' agenda, partisan bias in newspaper election coverage, and ideological self-identification.
Recensioner i media
Schiffer's timely volume on the real problems with news media debunks common allegations of political bias, in particular liberal bias. The author explains in his introduction that ‘[the media] sometimes inflict serious injury on informed citizenship through a litany of routines, biases, and shortcomings that leave news consumers ill-equipped to navigate contemporary politics.’ For example, he discusses the media’s focus on the competition and personalities of campaigns and elections rather than comprehensive coverage of the complex matters of policy. He also notes how news stories are depicted as isolated events instead of patterns that emerge over time, which would allow for more reflection and critical thinking. Schiffer also blames the media for its inattention to the verification of facts. And he reminds us that news media is interested in covering the sensational over more substantial themes and topics that cannot be converted into sound bites. The most compelling chapters in the book are those that explain how Donald Trump was able to use ‘every known quirk and pattern of the mainstream media’ to his advantage after he first declared himself a presidential nominee on June 16, 2015: novelty, conflict, negativity, sex/vulgarity, personalization, obsession with celebrity, simplicity, and horse-race coverage.Summing Up: Recommended. Lower-division undergraduates through faculty.
Betyg & recensioner
0 recensioner
Inga recensioner tillgängliga.