Richard J. Golsan is a University Distinguished Professor of French at Texas A&M University. Sarah M. Misemer is an associate professor in the Department of Hispanic Studies at Texas A & M University. She is also the associate director of the Melbern G. Glasscock Center for Humanities Research.

"This is a collection well worth reading..."- Ned Curthoys, The University of Western Australia (Arendt Studies, vol. 2, 2018) "As a reflection of current trends in a variety of disciplines, this essay collection serves as an apt contribution to a debate that, given the multifaceted nature of Arendt’s oeuvre and the pervasiveness of mass violence, is not likely to end any time soon."- Jürgen Matthäus, Washington, D.C. (American Historical Review, April 2019)

• Introduction1 Judging the Past: The Eichmann TrialHenry Rousso2 Eichmann in Jerusalem: Conscience, Normality, and the "Rule of Narrative"Dana Villa3 Banality, AgainDaniel Conway4 Eichmann on the Stand: Self-Recognition and the Problem of TruthValerie Hartouni5. Arendt’s Conservatism and the Eichmann JudgementRussell A. Berman6 Eichmann’s Victims, Holocaust Historiography, and Victim TestimonyCarolyn J. Dean7. Truth and Judgement in Arendt’s WritingLeora Bilsky8. Arendt, German Law and the Crime of AtrocityLawrence Douglas9. Whose Trial? Adolf Eichmann’s or Hannah Arendt’s? The Eichmann Controversy RevisitedSeyla BenhabibContributorsIndex

Richard J. Golsan is a University Distinguished Professor of French at Texas A&M University. Sarah M. Misemer is an associate professor in the Department of Hispanic Studies at Texas A & M University. She is also the associate director of the Melbern G. Glasscock Center for Humanities Research.

"This is a collection well worth reading..."- Ned Curthoys, The University of Western Australia (Arendt Studies, vol. 2, 2018) "As a reflection of current trends in a variety of disciplines, this essay collection serves as an apt contribution to a debate that, given the multifaceted nature of Arendt’s oeuvre and the pervasiveness of mass violence, is not likely to end any time soon."- Jürgen Matthäus, Washington, D.C. (American Historical Review, April 2019)

• Introduction1 Judging the Past: The Eichmann TrialHenry Rousso2 Eichmann in Jerusalem: Conscience, Normality, and the "Rule of Narrative"Dana Villa3 Banality, AgainDaniel Conway4 Eichmann on the Stand: Self-Recognition and the Problem of TruthValerie Hartouni5. Arendt’s Conservatism and the Eichmann JudgementRussell A. Berman6 Eichmann’s Victims, Holocaust Historiography, and Victim TestimonyCarolyn J. Dean7. Truth and Judgement in Arendt’s WritingLeora Bilsky8. Arendt, German Law and the Crime of AtrocityLawrence Douglas9. Whose Trial? Adolf Eichmann’s or Hannah Arendt’s? The Eichmann Controversy RevisitedSeyla BenhabibContributorsIndex

Richard J. Golsan is a University Distinguished Professor of French at Texas A&M University. Sarah M. Misemer is an associate professor in the Department of Hispanic Studies at Texas A & M University. She is also the associate director of the Melbern G. Glasscock Center for Humanities Research.

"This is a collection well worth reading..."- Ned Curthoys, The University of Western Australia (Arendt Studies, vol. 2, 2018) "As a reflection of current trends in a variety of disciplines, this essay collection serves as an apt contribution to a debate that, given the multifaceted nature of Arendt’s oeuvre and the pervasiveness of mass violence, is not likely to end any time soon."- Jürgen Matthäus, Washington, D.C. (American Historical Review, April 2019)

• Introduction1 Judging the Past: The Eichmann TrialHenry Rousso2 Eichmann in Jerusalem: Conscience, Normality, and the "Rule of Narrative"Dana Villa3 Banality, AgainDaniel Conway4 Eichmann on the Stand: Self-Recognition and the Problem of TruthValerie Hartouni5. Arendt’s Conservatism and the Eichmann JudgementRussell A. Berman6 Eichmann’s Victims, Holocaust Historiography, and Victim TestimonyCarolyn J. Dean7. Truth and Judgement in Arendt’s WritingLeora Bilsky8. Arendt, German Law and the Crime of AtrocityLawrence Douglas9. Whose Trial? Adolf Eichmann’s or Hannah Arendt’s? The Eichmann Controversy RevisitedSeyla BenhabibContributorsIndex