Pontus Odmalm is Senior Lecturer in Politics at the University of Edinburgh.Eve Hepburn is Senior Lecturer in Politics and International Relations at the University of Edinburgh.

Select Guide Rating

• The European Mainstream and the Populist Radical RightAcknowledgments Mainstream Parties, the Populist Radical Right, and the (Alleged) Lack of a Restrictive and Assimilationist Alternative Pontus Odmalm and Eve Hepburn 2. The European Mainstream and the Populist Radical Right (PRR): The British Case Rebecca Partos 3. Conflict and Co-operation between the Danish Mainstream as a Condition for Adaptation to the Populist Radical Right Flemming Juul Christiansen 4. Immigration, Integration and the Finns Party: Issue-ownership by Coincidence or by Stealth? Mikko Kuisma and Mikael Nygård 5. The French Mainstream and the Front National’s Electoral Fortunes João Carvalho 6. Accommodating the Dutch Populist Radical Right in a Multi-Party System: Success or Failure?Marijn van Klingeren, Andrej Zaslove and Bertjan Verbeek7. Sweden: From Deviant Case to PRR Hotbed? Anders Widfeldt 8. Concluding Remarks Pontus OdmalmTables and Figures Chapter 1Figure 1. Aggregate Manifesto Positions on the Immigration 'Issue' (2002 - 2015) Table 1. Results for the Populist Radical Right, 1956 – 2015 (%); national/federal level electionsTable 2. Case Parties and Votes (2002 – 2015)Table 3. Breakdown of Positions on the Immigration ‘Issue’, 2002 – 2015.Table 4. Was an aggregate R/A-choice offered by one or more mainstream parties? (2002 – 2015)Table 5. Subcategories of the immigration ‘issue’ where an R/A-choice was offered by one or more mainstream parties (2002 – 2015)Table 6. Changes to PRR vote share (2002 – 2015)Chapter 3 Table 1. Election results (seats gained, 2007-2015)Table 2. Manifesto and Coalition Agreement Positions (2007)Table 3: Manifesto and Coalition Agreement Positions (2011)Table 4: Manifesto and Coalition Agreement Positions (2011)Chapter 6 Figure 1. Left-right placements by party positions on immigration ‘issue’ (2006– 2012)Chapter 7Figure 1. Proportion of Swedish population with foreign origin, 2000-2015Figure 2. Public attitudes to immigration in 15 European countries, 2014.Figure 3. Saliency of immigration issue in Sweden, 1987-2014. Table 1. Issue ownership of immigration, Sweden 2014. Percentages of voters indicating each parliamentary party as having the best policies on immigration/refugees. Table 2. Parliamentary election results for New Democracy and Sweden Democrats, 1988-2014Table 3. Voters’ placements of Social Democrat and Moderate parties on a left-right scale, 1979-2014. Table 4a. Immigration positioningTable 4b. Summary positions

Pontus Odmalm is Senior Lecturer in Politics at the University of Edinburgh.Eve Hepburn is Senior Lecturer in Politics and International Relations at the University of Edinburgh.

Select Guide Rating

• The European Mainstream and the Populist Radical RightAcknowledgments Mainstream Parties, the Populist Radical Right, and the (Alleged) Lack of a Restrictive and Assimilationist Alternative Pontus Odmalm and Eve Hepburn 2. The European Mainstream and the Populist Radical Right (PRR): The British Case Rebecca Partos 3. Conflict and Co-operation between the Danish Mainstream as a Condition for Adaptation to the Populist Radical Right Flemming Juul Christiansen 4. Immigration, Integration and the Finns Party: Issue-ownership by Coincidence or by Stealth? Mikko Kuisma and Mikael Nygård 5. The French Mainstream and the Front National’s Electoral Fortunes João Carvalho 6. Accommodating the Dutch Populist Radical Right in a Multi-Party System: Success or Failure?Marijn van Klingeren, Andrej Zaslove and Bertjan Verbeek7. Sweden: From Deviant Case to PRR Hotbed? Anders Widfeldt 8. Concluding Remarks Pontus OdmalmTables and Figures Chapter 1Figure 1. Aggregate Manifesto Positions on the Immigration 'Issue' (2002 - 2015) Table 1. Results for the Populist Radical Right, 1956 – 2015 (%); national/federal level electionsTable 2. Case Parties and Votes (2002 – 2015)Table 3. Breakdown of Positions on the Immigration ‘Issue’, 2002 – 2015.Table 4. Was an aggregate R/A-choice offered by one or more mainstream parties? (2002 – 2015)Table 5. Subcategories of the immigration ‘issue’ where an R/A-choice was offered by one or more mainstream parties (2002 – 2015)Table 6. Changes to PRR vote share (2002 – 2015)Chapter 3 Table 1. Election results (seats gained, 2007-2015)Table 2. Manifesto and Coalition Agreement Positions (2007)Table 3: Manifesto and Coalition Agreement Positions (2011)Table 4: Manifesto and Coalition Agreement Positions (2011)Chapter 6 Figure 1. Left-right placements by party positions on immigration ‘issue’ (2006– 2012)Chapter 7Figure 1. Proportion of Swedish population with foreign origin, 2000-2015Figure 2. Public attitudes to immigration in 15 European countries, 2014.Figure 3. Saliency of immigration issue in Sweden, 1987-2014. Table 1. Issue ownership of immigration, Sweden 2014. Percentages of voters indicating each parliamentary party as having the best policies on immigration/refugees. Table 2. Parliamentary election results for New Democracy and Sweden Democrats, 1988-2014Table 3. Voters’ placements of Social Democrat and Moderate parties on a left-right scale, 1979-2014. Table 4a. Immigration positioningTable 4b. Summary positions

Pontus Odmalm is Senior Lecturer in Politics at the University of Edinburgh.Eve Hepburn is Senior Lecturer in Politics and International Relations at the University of Edinburgh.

Select Guide Rating

• The European Mainstream and the Populist Radical RightAcknowledgments Mainstream Parties, the Populist Radical Right, and the (Alleged) Lack of a Restrictive and Assimilationist Alternative Pontus Odmalm and Eve Hepburn 2. The European Mainstream and the Populist Radical Right (PRR): The British Case Rebecca Partos 3. Conflict and Co-operation between the Danish Mainstream as a Condition for Adaptation to the Populist Radical Right Flemming Juul Christiansen 4. Immigration, Integration and the Finns Party: Issue-ownership by Coincidence or by Stealth? Mikko Kuisma and Mikael Nygård 5. The French Mainstream and the Front National’s Electoral Fortunes João Carvalho 6. Accommodating the Dutch Populist Radical Right in a Multi-Party System: Success or Failure?Marijn van Klingeren, Andrej Zaslove and Bertjan Verbeek7. Sweden: From Deviant Case to PRR Hotbed? Anders Widfeldt 8. Concluding Remarks Pontus OdmalmTables and Figures Chapter 1Figure 1. Aggregate Manifesto Positions on the Immigration 'Issue' (2002 - 2015) Table 1. Results for the Populist Radical Right, 1956 – 2015 (%); national/federal level electionsTable 2. Case Parties and Votes (2002 – 2015)Table 3. Breakdown of Positions on the Immigration ‘Issue’, 2002 – 2015.Table 4. Was an aggregate R/A-choice offered by one or more mainstream parties? (2002 – 2015)Table 5. Subcategories of the immigration ‘issue’ where an R/A-choice was offered by one or more mainstream parties (2002 – 2015)Table 6. Changes to PRR vote share (2002 – 2015)Chapter 3 Table 1. Election results (seats gained, 2007-2015)Table 2. Manifesto and Coalition Agreement Positions (2007)Table 3: Manifesto and Coalition Agreement Positions (2011)Table 4: Manifesto and Coalition Agreement Positions (2011)Chapter 6 Figure 1. Left-right placements by party positions on immigration ‘issue’ (2006– 2012)Chapter 7Figure 1. Proportion of Swedish population with foreign origin, 2000-2015Figure 2. Public attitudes to immigration in 15 European countries, 2014.Figure 3. Saliency of immigration issue in Sweden, 1987-2014. Table 1. Issue ownership of immigration, Sweden 2014. Percentages of voters indicating each parliamentary party as having the best policies on immigration/refugees. Table 2. Parliamentary election results for New Democracy and Sweden Democrats, 1988-2014Table 3. Voters’ placements of Social Democrat and Moderate parties on a left-right scale, 1979-2014. Table 4a. Immigration positioningTable 4b. Summary positions